Download PDF
Rofo 2016; 188(12): 1123-1133
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-111075
Review
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Management of Intracranial Incidental Findings on Brain MRI

Management intrakranieller Zufallsbefunde in der MRT-Bildgebung
S. Langner
1   Institute for Diagnostic Radiology and Neuroradiology, Universitymedicine Greifswald, Germany
,
R. Buelow
1   Institute for Diagnostic Radiology and Neuroradiology, Universitymedicine Greifswald, Germany
,
S. Fleck
2   Department of Neurosurgery, Universitymedicine Greifswald, Germany
,
A. Angermaier
3   Department of Neurology, Universitymedicine Greifswald, Germany
,
M. Kirsch
1   Institute for Diagnostic Radiology and Neuroradiology, Universitymedicine Greifswald, Germany
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

07 February 2016

30 May 2016

Publication Date:
19 July 2016 (online)

Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

The wider use of MRI for imaging of the head in both research and clinical practice has led to an increasing number of intracranial incidental findings. Most of these findings have no immediate medical consequences. Nevertheless, knowledge of common intracranial incidental findings and their clinical relevance is necessary to adequately discuss the findings with the patient. Based on the author´s experiences from a large population-based study, the most common incidental MR findings in the brain will be presented, discussing their clinical relevance and giving recommendations for management according to the current literature and guidelines.

Key points:

• Intracranial incidental findings are common.

• The majority of these findings have no immediate medical consequences.

• Knowledge of common incidental findings is necessary for appropriate management.

Citation Format:

• Langner S, Buelow R, Fleck S et al. Management of Intracranial Incidental Findings on Brain MRI. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2016; 188: 1123 – 1133

Zusammenfassung

Durch eine Zunahme von MR-Untersuchungen des Kopfes, sowohl im Rahmen von Studien als auch in der klinischen Routine, kommt es zu einer steigenden Anzahl intrakranieller Zufallsbefunde. Die Mehrzahl dieser Befunde hat keine unmittelbare medizinische Konsequenz. Dennoch sind Kenntnisse über häufige intrakranielle Zufallsbefunde und ihre klinische Relevanz notwendig, um den Befund adäquat mit dem Patienten diskutieren zu können. Basierend auf den eigenen Erfahrungen aus einer populationsbasierten MR-Studie sowie fMRT-Studien werden die häufigsten intrakraniellen Zufallsbefunde in der MRT dargestellt und ihre klinische Relevanz bzw. Empfehlungen zum Management entsprechend der aktuellen Literatur und Leitlinien aufgezeigt.

Key words

incidental finding - brain - MRI

Deutscher Artikel/German Article

 

  • References

  • 1 Hegenscheid K, Seipel R, Schmidt CO et al. Potentially relevant incidental findings on research whole-body MRI in the general adult population: frequencies and management. European radiology 2013; 23: 816-826
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Bamberg F, Kauczor HU, Weckbach S et al. Whole-Body MR Imaging in the German National Cohort: Rationale, Design, and Technical Background. Radiology 2015; 277: 206-220
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Vernooij MW, Ikram MA, Tanghe HL et al. Incidental findings on brain MRI in the general population. The New England journal of medicine 2007; 357: 1821-1828
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Illes J, Kirschen MP, Edwards E et al. Ethics. Incidental findings in brain imaging research. Science (New York, NY) 2006; 311: 783-784
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Orme NM, Fletcher JG, Siddiki HA et al. Incidental findings in imaging research: evaluating incidence, benefit, and burden. Archives of internal medicine 2010; 170: 1525-1532
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Sandeman EM, Hernandez Mdel C, Morris Z et al. Incidental findings on brain MR imaging in older community-dwelling subjects are common but serious medical consequences are rare: a cohort study. PloS one 2013; 8: e71467
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Schmidt CO, Hegenscheid K, Erdmann P et al. Psychosocial consequences and severity of disclosed incidental findings from whole-body MRI in a general population study. European radiology 2013; 23: 1343-1351
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Fiehler J. Unruptured brain aneurysms: when to screen and when to treat?. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2012; 184: 97-104
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Caranci F, Tedeschi E, Leone G et al. Errors in neuroradiology. La Radiologia medica 2015; 120: 795-801
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Bunnik EM, Vernooij MW. Incidental findings in population imaging revisited. European journal of epidemiology 2016; 31: 1-4
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Tubbs RS, Krishnamurthy S, Verma K et al. Cavum velum interpositum, cavum septum pellucidum, and cavum vergae: a review. Child's nervous system: ChNS: official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery 2011; 27: 1927-1930
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Trzesniak C, Oliveira IR, Kempton MJ et al. Are cavum septum pellucidum abnormalities more common in schizophrenia spectrum disorders? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Schizophrenia research 2011; 125: 1-12
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Kiroglu Y, Karabulut N, Oncel C et al. Cerebral lateral ventricular asymmetry on CT: how much asymmetry is representing pathology?. Surgical and radiologic anatomy 2008; 30: 249-255
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Tarnaris A, Kitchen ND, Watkins LD. Noninvasive biomarkers in normal pressure hydrocephalus: evidence for the role of neuroimaging. Journal of neurosurgery 2009; 110: 837-851
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Eidlitz-Markus T, Zeharia A, Cohen YH et al. Characteristics and management of arachnoid cyst in the pediatric headache clinic setting. Headache 2014; 54: 1583-1590
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Berhouma M, Ni H, Delabar V et al. Update on the management of pineal cysts: Case series and a review of the literature. Neuro-Chirurgie 2015; 61: 201-207
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Gur RE, Kaltman D, Melhem ER et al. Incidental findings in youths volunteering for brain MRI research. American journal of neuroradiology 2013; 34: 2021-2025
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Langner S, Kirsch M. Radiological Diagnosis and Differential Diagnosis of Headache. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2015; 187: 879-891
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Potter GM, Doubal FN, Jackson CA et al. Enlarged perivascular spaces and cerebral small vessel disease. International journal of stroke: official journal of the International Stroke Society 2015; 10: 376-381
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Cakir B, Karakas HM, Unlu E et al. Asymptomatic choroid plexus cysts in the lateral ventricles: an incidental finding on diffusion-weighted MRI. Neuroradiology 2002; 44: 830-833
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Peraud A, Illner A, Rutka JT. Intraventricular congenital lesions and colloid cysts. Neurosurgery clinics of North America 2003; 14: 607-619
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Ducruet AF, Grobelny BT, Zacharia BE et al. The surgical management of chronic subdural hematoma. Neurosurgical review 2012; 35: 155-169 ; discussion 169
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Poels MM, Ikram MA, van der Lugt A et al. Incidence of cerebral microbleeds in the general population: the Rotterdam Scan Study. Stroke: a journal of cerebral circulation 2011; 42: 656-661
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Schrag M, Greer DM. Clinical associations of cerebral microbleeds on magnetic resonance neuroimaging. Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases: the official journal of National Stroke Association 2014; 23: 2489-2497
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Mok V, Kim JS. Prevention and Management of Cerebral Small Vessel Disease. Journal of stroke 2015; 17: 111-122
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Debette S, Markus HS. The clinical importance of white matter hyperintensities on brain magnetic resonance imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ (Clinical research ed) 2010; 341: c3666
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Pantoni L, Fierini F, Poggesi A. Impact of cerebral white matter changes on functionality in older adults: An overview of the LADIS Study results and future directions. Geriatrics & gerontology international 2015; 15: 10-16
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Dufouil C, Chalmers J, Coskun O et al. Effects of blood pressure lowering on cerebral white matter hyperintensities in patients with stroke: the PROGRESS (Perindopril Protection Against Recurrent Stroke Study) Magnetic Resonance Imaging Substudy. Circulation 2005; 112: 1644-1650
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Okuda DT, Mowry EM, Beheshtian A et al. Incidental MRI anomalies suggestive of multiple sclerosis: the radiologically isolated syndrome. Neurology 2009; 72: 800-805
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Forslin Y, Granberg T, Jumah AA et al. Incidence of Radiologically Isolated Syndrome: A Population-Based Study. American journal of neuroradiology 2016;
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Okuda DT, Siva A, Kantarci O et al. Radiologically isolated syndrome: 5-year risk for an initial clinical event. PloS one 2014; 9: e90509
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Granberg T, Martola J, Kristoffersen-Wiberg M et al. Radiologically isolated syndrome--incidental magnetic resonance imaging findings suggestive of multiple sclerosis, a systematic review. Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) 2013; 19: 271-280
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Holmstedt CA, Turan TN, Chimowitz MI. Atherosclerotic intracranial arterial stenosis: risk factors, diagnosis, and treatment. The Lancet Neurology 2013; 12: 1106-1114
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Zaidat OO, Castonguay AC, Nguyen TN et al. Impact of SAMMPRIS on the future of intracranial atherosclerotic disease management: polling results from the ICAD symposium at the International Stroke Conference. Journal of neurointerventional surgery 2014; 6: 225-230
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Ryu WS, Park SS, Kim YS et al. Long-term natural history of intracranial arterial stenosis: an MRA follow-up study. Cerebrovascular diseases (Basel, Switzerland) 2014; 38: 290-296
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 36 Saini M, Suministrado MS, Hilal S et al. Prevalence and Risk Factors of Acute Incidental Infarcts. Stroke: a journal of cerebral circulation 2015; 46: 2722-2727
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 37 Saini M, Ikram K, Hilal S et al. Silent stroke: not listened to rather than silent. Stroke: a journal of cerebral circulation 2012; 43: 3102-3104
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 38 Sailer AM, Wagemans BA, Nelemans PJ et al. Diagnosing intracranial aneurysms with MR angiography: systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke: a journal of cerebral circulation 2014; 45: 119-126
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 39 Chalouhi N, Dumont AS, Randazzo C et al. Management of incidentally discovered intracranial vascular abnormalities. Neurosurgical focus 2011; 31: E1
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 40 Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurologie. AWMF-Leitlinie Unrupturierte intrakranielle Aneurysmen. www.awmf.org/uploads/tx_szleitlinien/030-030l_S1_Unruptierte_intrakranielle_Aneurysmen_2012_verlaengert.pdf
    PubMed
  • 41 Greving JP, Wermer MJ, Brown Jr RD et al. Development of the PHASES score for prediction of risk of rupture of intracranial aneurysms: a pooled analysis of six prospective cohort studies. The Lancet Neurology 2014; 13: 59-66
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 42 Josephson CB, Leach JP, Duncan R et al. Seizure risk from cavernous or arteriovenous malformations: prospective population-based study. Neurology 2011; 76: 1548-1554
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 43 Ruiz DS, Yilmaz H, Gailloud P. Cerebral developmental venous anomalies: current concepts. Annals of neurology 2009; 66: 271-283
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 44 Gross BA, Puri AS, Popp AJ et al. Cerebral capillary telangiectasias: a meta-analysis and review of the literature. Neurosurgical review 2013; 36: 187-193 ; discussion 194
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 45 Barreau X, Marnat G, Gariel F et al. Intracranial arteriovenous malformations. Diagnostic and interventional imaging 2014; 95: 1175-1186
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 46 Spetzler RF, Ponce FA. A 3-tier classification of cerebral arteriovenous malformations. Clinical article. Journal of neurosurgery 2011; 114: 842-849
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 47 Mohr JP, Parides MK, Stapf C et al. Medical management with or without interventional therapy for unruptured brain arteriovenous malformations (ARUBA): a multicentre, non-blinded, randomised trial. Lancet (London, England) 2014; 383: 614-621
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 48 Chamoun R, Krisht KM, Couldwell WT. Incidental meningiomas. Neurosurgical focus 2011; 31: E19
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 49 Shah AH, Madhavan K, Sastry A et al. Managing intracranial incidental findings suggestive of low-grade glioma: learning from experience. World neurosurgery 2013; 80: e75-e77
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 50 Freda PU, Beckers AM, Katznelson L et al. Pituitary incidentaloma: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline. The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism 2011; 96: 894-904
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar