Download PDF
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2018; 235(02): 196-201
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-119299
Übersicht
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Buckelchirurgie: Old Fashion oder Cutting Edge?

Buckling Surgery: Old Fashioned or Cutting Edge?
N. Feltgen
Klinik für Augenheilkunde, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen
,
H. Hoerauf
Klinik für Augenheilkunde, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

eingereicht 22 September 2016

akzeptiert 09 October 2016

Publication Date:
13 January 2017 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Eindellende Operationen waren über Jahrzehnte die einzige Behandlungsmöglichkeit bei der Versorgung der Ablatio retinae. In den vergangenen Jahren werden sie aber immer mehr von der Vitrektomie verdrängt, obwohl auch die zahlreichen vergleichenden klinischen Studien keine Evidenz für diesen Trend erkennen lassen. In diesem Beitrag sollen die relevanten Daten vorgestellt und die Indikationen für eine eindellende Operation dargestellt werden.

Abstract

For many decades, scleral buckling surgery was the only reasonable surgical procedure in eyes with primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. In recent years, primary vitrectomy has apparently become the treatment of choice, although evidence from comparative clinical trials is missing. In this article, data from clinical trials and indications for buckling surgery are presented.

Schlüsselwörter

eindellende Operation - Vitrektomie - Netzhautablösung - Plombe - Cerclage - Ablatio retinae

Key words

buckling surgery - retinal detachment - vitrectomy - sponge - encircling band
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Polkinghorne PJ. One hundred years of retinal detachment surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 2016; 100: 1309-1311
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Rosengreen B. Über die Behandlung der Netzhautablösung mittels Diathermie und Luftinjektion in den Glaskörper. Acta Ophthal 1938; 16: 3-42
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Custodis E. Beobachtungen bei der diathermischen Behandlung der Netzhautablösung und ein Hinweis zur Therapie der Amotio retinae. Berichte DOG 1951; 57: 227
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Lincoff H, Baras I, McLean J. Modifications to the Custodis procedure for retinal detachment. Arch Ophthalmol 1965; 73: 160-163
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Schepens CL. Symposium: present status of retinal detachment surgery. Scleral buckling with circling element. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol 1964; 68: 959-979
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Poulsen CD, Peto T, Grauslund J. et al. Epidemiologic characteristics of retinal detachment surgery at a specialized unit in Denmark. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 2016; 94: 548-555
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Hajari JN, Christensen U, Kiilgaard JF. et al. Reoperation for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment as quality indicator for disease management: a register study. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 2015; 93: 505-511
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Cho GE, Kim SW, Kang SW. et al. Changing trends in surgery for retinal detachment in Korea. Korean J Ophthalmol 2014; 28: 451-459
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Jackson TL, Donachie PH, Sallam A. et al. United Kingdom National Ophthalmology Database study of vitreoretinal surgery: report 3, retinal detachment. Ophthalmology 2014; 121: 643-648
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Mitry D, Awan MA, Borooah S. et al. Surgical outcome and risk stratification for primary retinal detachment repair: results from the Scottish Retinal Detachment study. Br J Ophthalmol 2012; 96: 730-734
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Thelen U, Amler S, Osada N. et al. Outcome of surgery after macula-off retinal detachment – results from MUSTARD, one of the largest databases on buckling surgery in Europe. Results from a large German case series. Acta Ophthalmol 2012; 90: 481-486
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Haritoglou C, Brandlhuber U, Kampik A. et al. Anatomic success of scleral buckling for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment–a retrospective study of 524 cases. Ophthalmologica 2010; 224: 312-318
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Schwartz SG, Kuhl DP, McPherson AR. et al. Twenty-year follow-up for scleral buckling. Arch Ophthalmol 2002; 120: 325-329
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Feltgen N, Weiss C, Wolf S. et al. Scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment study (SPR Study): recruitment list evaluation. Study report no. 2. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2007; 245: 803-809
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Wong CW, Yeo IY, Loh BK. et al. Scleral buckling versus vitrectomy in the management of macula-off primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a comparison of visual outcomes. Retina 2015; 35: 2552-2557
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Heimann H, Hellmich M, Bornfeld N. et al. Scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (SPR Study): design issues and implications. SPR Study report no. 1. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2001; 239: 567-574
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Heimann H, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Bornfeld N. et al. Scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a prospective randomized multicenter clinical study. Ophthalmology 2007; 114: 2142-2154
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Soni C, Hainsworth DP, Almony A. Surgical management of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ophthalmology 2013; 120: 1440-1447
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Lv Z, Li Y, Wu Y, Qu Y. Surgical complications of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a meta-analysis. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0116493
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Koutsandrea C, Kanakis M, Papaconstantinou D. et al. Scleral buckling versus vitrectomy for retinal detachment repair: comparison of visual fields and nerve fiber layer thickness. Ophthalmologica 2016; 235: 10-17
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Oshima Y, Yamanishi S, Sawa M. et al. Two-year follow-up study comparing primary vitrectomy with scleral buckling for macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2000; 44: 538-549
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Miki D, Hida T, Hotta K. et al. Comparison of scleral buckling and vitrectomy for retinal detachment resulting from flap tears in superior quadrants. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2001; 45: 187-191
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Roider J, Hoerauf H, Hager A. et al. [Conventional ablation surgery or primary vitrectomy in complicated retinal holes]. Ophthalmologe 2001; 98: 887-891
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Le Rouic JF, Behar-Cohen F, Azan F. et al. [Vitrectomy without scleral buckle versus ab-externo approach for pseudophakic retinal detachment: comparative retrospective study]. J Fr Ophtalmol 2002; 25: 240-245
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Tewari HK, Kedar S, Kumar A. et al. Comparison of scleral buckling with combined scleral buckling and pars plana vitrectomy in the management of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with unseen retinal breaks. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2003; 31: 403-407
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Afrashi F, Erakgun T, Akkin C. et al. Conventional buckling surgery or primary vitrectomy with silicone oil tamponade in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with multiple breaks. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2004; 242: 295-300
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Ahmadieh H, Moradian S, Faghihi H. et al. Anatomic and visual outcomes of scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in pseudophakic and aphakic retinal detachment: six-month follow-up results of a single operation–report no. 1. Ophthalmology 2005; 112: 1421-1429
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Brazitikos PD, Androudi S, Christen WG. et al. Primary pars plana vitrectomy versus scleral buckle surgery for the treatment of pseudophakic retinal detachment: a randomized clinical trial. Retina 2005; 25: 957-964
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Sharma YR, Karunanithi S, Azad RV. et al. Functional and anatomic outcome of scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in pseudophakic retinal detachment. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2005; 83: 293-297
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Azad RV, Chanana B, Sharma YR. et al. Primary vitrectomy versus conventional retinal detachment surgery in phakic rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2007; 85: 540-545
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Koriyama M, Nishimura T, Matsubara T. et al. Prospective study comparing the effectiveness of scleral buckling to vitreous surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2007; 51: 360-367
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Kobashi H, Takano M, Yanagita T. et al. Scleral buckling and pars plana vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: an analysis of 542 eyes. Curr Eye Res 2014; 39: 204-211
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Moradian S, Ahmadieh H, Faghihi H. et al. Comparison of four surgical techniques for management of pseudophakic and aphakic retinal detachment: a multicenter clinical trial. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2016; 254: 1743-1751
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Noori J, Bilonick RA, Eller AW. Scleral buckle surgery for primary retinal detachment without posterior vitreous detachment. Retina 2016; 36: 2066-2071
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Elhousseini Z, Lee E, Williamson TH. Incidence of lens touch during pars plana vitrectomy and outcomes from subsequent cataract surgery. Retina 2016; 36: 825-829
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 36 Rosen PH, Wong HC, McLeod D. Indentation microsurgery: internal searching for retinal breaks. Eye (Lond) 1989; 3: 277-281
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 37 Narayanan R, Tyagi M, Hussein A. et al. Scleral buckling with wide-angled endoillumination as a surgical educational tool. Retina 2016; 36: 830-833
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 38 Gogia V, Venkatesh P, Gupta S. et al. Endoilluminator-assisted scleral buckling: our results. Indian J Ophthalmol 2014; 62: 893-894
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 39 Poole TA, Sudarsky RD. Suprachoroidal implantation for the treatment of retinal detachment. Ophthalmology 1986; 93: 1408-1412
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 40 El Rayes EN, Mikhail M, El Cheweiky H. et al. Suprachoroidal buckling for the management of rhegmatogenous retinal detachments secondary to peripheral retinal breaks. Retina 2016; [Epub ahead of print]
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 41 El Rayes EN, Elborgy E. Suprachoroidal buckling: technique and indications. J Ophthalmic Vis Res 2013; 8: 393-399
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 42 Szurman P, Boden K, Januschowski K. Suprachoroidal hydrogel buckling as a surgical treatment of retinal detachment: biocompatibility and first experiences. Retina 2016; 36: 1786-1790
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 43 Lincoff HA, Kreissig I, Hahn YS. A temporary balloon buckle for the treatment of small retinal detachments. Ophthalmology 1979; 86: 586-596
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 44 Kreissig I. [10 yearsʼ experience with balloon procedures: skepticism at the beginning, further development of the method, practical references for the balloon technician]. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 1989; 194: 145-151
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 45 Framme C, Roider J, Hoerauf H. et al. Komplikationen nach externer Netzhautchirurgie bei Pseudophakieablatio – Sind eindellende Operationsverfahren noch aktuell?. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 2000; 216: 25-32
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar