Int J Angiol 2022; 31(03): 198-202
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1750328
Invited Article

The Pulmonary Embolism Response Team: Rationale, Operation, and Outcomes

1   Department of Medicine, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan
2   Department of Cardiology, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, Michigan
,
Skarlet Patiño-Velasquez
1   Department of Medicine, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan
,
Carlos Oviedo
1   Department of Medicine, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

The pulmonary embolism response team (PERT) is an institutionally based multidisciplinary team that is able to rapidly assess and provide treatment for patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE). Intrinsic to the team's structure is a formal mechanism to execute a full range of medical, endovascular, and surgical therapies. In addition, the PERT provides appropriate multidisciplinary follow-up of patients. In the 10 years since the PERT was first introduced, it has gained acceptance in many centers in the United States and around the world. These PERTs have joined together to form an international association, called the PERT Consortium. The mission of this consortium is to advance the diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes of patients with PE. There is considerable evidence that the PERT model improves delivery and standardization of care of PE patients, particularly those patients with massive and submassive PE. However, it is not yet clear whether PERTs improve clinical outcomes. A large prospective database is currently being compiled by the PERT Consortium. Analysis of this database will likely further delineate the role of PERTs in the management of intermediate-to-high risk PE patients and, importantly, help determine in which PE patients PERT may improve clinical outcomes.



Publication History

Article published online:
25 August 2022

© 2022. International College of Angiology. This article is published by Thieme.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Di Nisio M, van Es N, Büller HR. Deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Lancet 2016; 388 (10063): 3060-3073
  • 2 CDC. Data and statistics on venous thromboembolism. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Published February 12, 2020. Accessed April 14, 2022 at: https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/dvt/data.html
  • 3 Office of the Surgeon General (US), National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (US). The surgeon general's Call to Action to Prevent Deep Vein Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism. Published online 2008. Accessed April 14, 2022 at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK44178/
  • 4 Tsao CW, Aday AW, Almarzooq ZI. et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2022 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2022; 145 (08) e153-e639
  • 5 Tapson VF, Weinberg AS. Treatment, prognosis, and follow-up of acute pulmonary embolism in adults. Mandel J, Hockberger RS, eds. UpToDate; 2022. Accessed April 16, 2022 at: https://www.uptodate.com/contents/treatment-prognosis-and-follow-up-of-acute-pulmonary-embolism-in-adults/print?search=pulmonary+embolism&source=search_result&selectedTitle=2~150&usage_type=default&display_rank=2
  • 6 Rivera-Lebron B, McDaniel M, Ahrar K. et al; PERT Consortium. Diagnosis, treatment and follow up of acute pulmonary embolism: consensus practice from the PERT consortium. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 2019; 25: 1076029619853037
  • 7 Olin JW. RESPONSE: do pulmonary embolism response teams result in improved outcomes in patients with pulmonary embolism?. J Am Coll Cardiol 2021; 77 (13) 1695-1696
  • 8 Konstantinides SV, Meyer G. The 2019 ESC guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism. Eur Heart J 2019; 40 (42) 3453-3455
  • 9 Jaff MR, McMurtry MS, Archer SL. et al; American Heart Association Council on Cardiopulmonary, Critical Care, Perioperative and Resuscitation, American Heart Association Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease, American Heart Association Council on Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis and Vascular Biology. Management of massive and submassive pulmonary embolism, iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis, and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2011; 123 (16) 1788-1830
  • 10 Kearon C, Akl EA, Ornelas J. et al. Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease: CHEST guideline and expert panel report. Chest 2016; 149 (02) 315-352
  • 11 El Saghir NS, Keating NL, Carlson RW, Khoury KE, Fallowfield L. Tumor boards: optimizing the structure and improving efficiency of multidisciplinary management of patients with cancer worldwide. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2014; 34: e461-e466
  • 12 Holmes Jr DR, Rich JB, Zoghbi WA, Mack MJ. The heart team of cardiovascular care. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 61 (09) 903-907
  • 13 Jones DA, DeVita MA, Bellomo R. Rapid-response teams. N Engl J Med 2011; 365 (02) 139-146
  • 14 What is PERT and How Can it Help Triage the PE Patient? Mass General Advances in Motion. Published August 17, 2017 Accessed April 14, 2022 at: https://advances.massgeneral.org/cardiovascular/video.aspx?id=1002
  • 15 The PERT Consortium® – the pulmonary embolism response team consortium – developing effective solutions to a devastating illness. Accessed April 15, 2022 at: https://pertconsortium.org/
  • 16 Barnes G, Giri J, Courtney DM. et al; National PERT™ Consortium Research Committee. Nuts and bolts of running a pulmonary embolism response team: results from an organizational survey of the National PERT™ Consortium members. Hosp Pract (1995) 2017; 45 (03) 76-80
  • 17 Rosovsky R, Zhao K, Sista A, Rivera-Lebron B, Kabrhel C. Pulmonary embolism response teams: purpose, evidence for efficacy, and future research directions. Res Pract Thromb Haemost 2019; 3 (03) 315-330
  • 18 Saif K, Kevane B, Ní Áinle F, Rosovsky RP. The role of the PERT team in 2021. Thrombosis Update 2022;6:100092. Accessed April 15, 2022 at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666572721000614
  • 19 Brailovsky Y, Lakhter V. Pulmonary embolism response team: additional call burden or a valuable learning opportunity?. J Am Coll Cardiol 2021; 77 (13) 1691-1696
  • 20 Bilazarian S. “Pulmonary-Embolism Response Team: not just for the big boys.” Medscape; 2015. Accessed April 15, 2022 at: https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/846071
  • 21 Chaudhury P, Gadre SK, Schneider E. et al. Impact of multidisciplinary pulmonary embolism response team availability on management and outcomes. Am J Cardiol 2019; 124 (09) 1465-1469
  • 22 Rosovsky R, Chang Y, Rosenfield K. et al. Changes in treatment and outcomes after creation of a pulmonary embolism response team (PERT), a 10-year analysis. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2019; 47 (01) 31-40
  • 23 Carroll BJ, Beyer SE, Mehegan T. et al. Changes in care for acute pulmonary embolism through a multidisciplinary pulmonary embolism response team. Am J Med 2020; 133 (11) 1313-1321.e6
  • 24 Lookstein RA, Secemsky RA, Giri J. Pert Consortium. Paper presented at: 6th Annual Scientific Symposium; Virtual Global Online; October 23–24, 2020