Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1754364
Imaging Artifacts on Synthesized Mammogram: What a Radiologist should Know!
Abstract
Synthesized mammogram is a new technique that involves reconstruction of a two-dimensional (2D) image from the tomosynthesis images rather than separate acquisition of a standard 2D mammogram. The advent of a synthesized mammogram (s2D) has helped in reducing radiation exposure. The technique of back projection used in reconstruction makes the appearance of these images different from a standard 2D mammogram. Because this is a relatively new technique, it is associated with a learning curve. Hence, it is important for the new radiologists and technicians to be aware of certain common artifacts encountered while using s2D images, which may hinder interpretation. In this pictorial review, we would like to highlight the common artifacts encountered while reading synthesized mammographic images.
Authors' Contributions
Shrea Gulati and Roshni Anand: writing the manuscript; Ekta Dhamija: concept design and critical editing of the manuscript.
Publication History
Article published online:
30 August 2022
© 2022. Indian Radiological Association. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
-
References
- 1 Rangarajan K, Hari S, Thulkar S, Sharma S, Srivastava A, Parshad R. Characterization of lesions in dense breasts: does tomosynthesis help?. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2016; 26 (02) 210-215
- 2 Dhamija E, Gulati M, Deo SVS, Gogia A, Hari S. Digital breast tomosynthesis: an overview. Indian J Surg Oncol 2021; 12 (02) 315-329
- 3 Health C for D and R. Digital Accreditation. FDA. Published online November 3, 2018. Accessed February 14, 2022. Available at: https://www.fda.gov/radiation-emitting-products/facility-certification-and-inspection-mqsa/digital-accreditation
- 4 Skaane P, Bandos AI, Eben EB. et al. Two-view digital breast tomosynthesis screening with synthetically reconstructed projection images: comparison with digital breast tomosynthesis with full-field digital mammographic images. Radiology 2014; 271 (03) 655-663
- 5 Zuckerman SP, Maidment ADA, Weinstein SP, McDonald ES, Conant EF. Imaging with synthesized 2D mammography: differences, advantages, and pitfalls compared with digital mammography. Am J Roentgenol 2017; 209 (01) 222-229
- 6 Mumin NA, Rahmat K, Fadzli F. et al. Diagnostic efficacy of synthesized 2D digital breast tomosynthesis in multi-ethnic Malaysian population. Sci Rep 2019; 9 (01) 1459
- 7 Durand MA. Synthesized mammography: clinical evidence, appearance, and implementation. Diagnostics (Basel) 2018; 8 (02) 22
- 8 Geiser WR, Einstein SA, Yang WT. Artifacts in digital breast tomosynthesis. Am J Roentgenol 2018; 211 (04) 926-932
- 9 Tirada N, Li G, Dreizin D. et al. Digital breast tomosynthesis: physics, artifacts, and quality control considerations. Radiographics 2019; 39 (02) 413-426
- 10 Abdurahman S, Jerebko A, Mertelmeier T, Lasser T, Navab N. Out-of-plane artifact reduction in tomosynthesis based on regression modeling and outlier detection. In: Maidment ADA, Bakic PR, Gavenonis S. eds. Breast Imaging. IWDM 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2012: 729-736
- 11 Lai YC, Ray KM, Mainprize JG, Kelil T, Joe BN. Digital breast tomosynthesis: technique and common srtifacts. J Breast Imaging 2020; 2 (06) 615-628
- 12 Herschorn SD. An implementation guide to C–ViewTM software that minimizes dose and recalls while maximizing physician confidence. Available at: https://www.hologic.com/sites/default/files/2017/Products/Image%20Analytics/PDFs/WP-00121%20_Rev001_CViewImplementation_FINAL.pdf
- 13 Freer PE, Winkler N. Synthesized digital mammography imaging. Radiol Clin North Am 2017; 55 (03) 503-512