Predictive Factors of Tolerance in Office Hysteroscopy – a 3-Year Analysis from a Tertiary Center

Abstract

Objective Pain is the primary limitation to performing hysteroscopy. We aimed to evaluate the predictive factors of low tolerance to office hysteroscopic procedures.

Methods Retrospective cohort study of the patients who underwent office hysteroscopy from January 2018 to December 2020 at a tertiary care center. Pain tolerance to office-based hysteroscopy was subjectively assessed by the operator as terrible, poor, moderate, good, or excellent. Categorical variables were compared with the use of the Chi-squared test; an independent-samples t-test was conducted to compare continuous variables. Logistic regression was performed to determine the main factors associated with low procedure tolerance.

Results A total of 1,418 office hysteroscopies were performed. The mean age of the patients was 53 ± 13.8 years; 50.8% of women were menopausal, 17.8% were nulliparous, and 68.7% had a previous vaginal delivery. A total of 42.6% of women were submitted to an operative hysteroscopy. Tolerance was categorized as terrible or poor in 14.9% of hysteroscopies and moderate, good, or excellent in 85.1%. A terrible or poor tolerance was more frequently reported in menopausal women (18.1% vs. 11.7% in premenopausal women, p = 0.001) and women with no previous vaginal delivery (18.8% vs. 12.9% in women with at least one vaginal birth, p = 0.007). Low tolerance led more often to scheduling a second hysteroscopic procedure under anesthesia (56.4% vs. 17.5% in reasonable-to-excellent tolerance, p < 0.0005).

Conclusion Office hysteroscopy was a well-tolerated procedure in our experience, but menopause and lack of previous vaginal delivery were associated with low tolerance. These patients are more likely to benefit from pain relief measures during office hysteroscopy.

Keywords

office hysteroscopy - tolerance - pain - risk factor - outpatient

Contributions

All authors contributed with the project and data interpretation, the writing of the article, the critical review of the intellectual content, and with the final approval of the version to be published.

Publication History

Received: 27 July 2022

Accepted: 20 September 2022

Article published online:
06 March 2023

• References

• 1 Salazar CA, Isaacson KB. Office operative hysteroscopy: an update. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2018; 25 (02) 199-208
• 2 Yang J, Vollenhoven B. Pain control in outpatient hysteroscopy. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2002; 57 (10) 693-702
• 3 de Carvalho Schettini JA, Ramos de Amorim MM, Ribeiro Costa AA, Albuquerque Neto LC. Pain evaluation in outpatients undergoing diagnostic anesthesia-free hysteroscopy in a teaching hospital: a cohort study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2007; 14 (06) 729-735
• 4 Cicinelli E. Hysteroscopy without anesthesia: review of recent literature. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2010; 17 (06) 703-708
• 5 Riemma G, Schiattarella A, Colacurci N, Vitale SG, Cianci S, Cianci A, De Franciscis P. Pharmacological and non-pharmacological pain relief for office hysteroscopy: an up-to-date review. Climacteric 2020; 23 (04) 376-383
• 6 Ghamry NK, Samy A, Abdelhakim AM, Elgebaly A, Ibrahim S, Ahmed AA. et al. Evaluation and ranking of different interventions for pain relief during outpatient hysteroscopy: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2020; 46 (06) 807-827
• 7 Vitale SG, Caruso S, Ciebiera M, Török P, Tesarik J, Vilos GA. et al. Management of anxiety and pain perception in women undergoing office hysteroscopy: a systematic review. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2020; 301 (04) 885-894
• 8 Samy A, Nabil H, Abdelhakim AM, Mahy ME, Abdel-Latif AA, Metwally AA. Pain management during diagnostic office hysteroscopy in postmenopausal women: a randomized study. Climacteric 2020; 23 (04) 397-403
• 9 Török P, Major T. Evaluating the level of pain during office hysteroscopy according to menopausal status, parity, and size of instrument. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2013; 287 (05) 985-988
• 10 Cicinelli E, Rossi AC, Marinaccio M, Matteo M, Saliani N, Tinelli R. Predictive factors for pain experienced at office fluid minihysteroscopy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2007; 14 (04) 485-488
• 11 Ahmad G, O'Flynn H, Attarbashi S, Duffy JM, Watson A. Pain relief for outpatient hysteroscopy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; (11) CD007710
• 12 Giorda G, Scarabelli C, Franceschi S, Campagnutta E. Feasibility and pain control in outpatient hysteroscopy in postmenopausal women: a randomized trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2000; 79 (07) 593-597
• 13 Bettocchi S, Bramante S, Bifulco G, Spinelli M, Ceci O, Fascilla FD, Sardo ADS. et al. Challenging the cervix: strategies to overcome the anatomic impediments to hysteroscopy: analysis of 31,052 office hysteroscopies. Fertil Steril 2016; 105 (05) e16-e17
• 14 Ahmad G, Saluja S, O'Flynn H, Sorrentino A, Leach D, Watson A. Pain relief for outpatient hysteroscopy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; (10) CD007710
• 15 De Iaco P, Marabini A, Stefanetti M, Del Vecchio C, Bovicelli L. Acceptability and pain of outpatient hysteroscopy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2000; 7 (01) 71-75
• 16 Sordia-Hernández LH, Rosales-Tristan E, Vazquez-Mendez J, Merino M, Iglesias JL, Garza-Leal JG, Morales A. Effectiveness of misoprostol for office hysteroscopy without anesthesia in infertile patients. Fertil Steril 2011; 95 (02) 759-761
• 17 Issat T, Beta J, Nowicka MA, Maciejewski T, Jakimiuk AJ. A randomized, single blind, placebo-controlled trial for the pain reduction during the outpatient hysteroscopy after ketoprofen or intravaginal misoprostol. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2014; 21 (05) 921-927
• 18 New EP, Sarkar P, Mikhail E, Plosker S, Imudia AN. Use of low dose vaginal misoprostol in office hysteroscopy: a pre-post interventional study. J Obstet Gynaecol 2021; 41 (06) 972-976