Latex-Infused Porcine Abdominal Model: A Novel Microsurgery Simulator for Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Dissection

Abstract

Background Perforator dissection and flap elevation are routinely performed for microsurgical reconstruction; however, there is a steep learning curve to mastering these technical skills. Though live porcine models have been utilized as a microsurgical training model, there are significant drawbacks that limit their use, including cost, limited ability for repetition, and obstacles associated with animal care. Here we describe the creation of a novel perforator dissection model using latex augmented non-living porcine abdominal walls. We provide anatomic measurements that demonstrate valuable similarities and differences to human anatomy to maximize microsurgical trainee practice.

Methods Six latex-infused porcine abdomens were dissected based on the deep cranial epigastric artery (DCEA). Dissection was centered over the abdominal wall mid-segment between the second and fourth nipple line. Dissection steps included exposure of lateral and medial row perforators, incision of anterior rectus sheath with perforator dissection, and dissection of DCEA pedicle. DCEA pedicle and perforator measurements were compared with deep inferior epigastric artery (DIEA) data in the literature.

Results An average of seven perforators were consistently identified within each flap. Assembly of the model was performed quickly and allowed for two training sessions per specimen. Porcine abdominal walls demonstrate similar DCEA pedicle (2.6 ± 0.21 mm) and perforator (1.0 ± 0.18 mm) size compared with a human's DIEA (2.7 ± 0.27 mm, 1.1 ± 0.85 mm).

Conclusion The latex-infused porcine abdominal model is a novel, realistic simulation for perforator dissection practice for microsurgical trainees. Impact on resident comfort and confidence within a microsurgical training course is forthcoming.

Keywords

resident education - microsurgery - surgical simulation

Authors' Contributions

Conceptualization: E.C.S., W.Z., A.M.D., S.O.P.

Formal analysis: E.C.S.

Investigation: E.C.S., W.Z., J.M.F., P.J.N., S.E.

Methodology: E.C.S., W.Z., A.M.D., S.O.P.

Supervision: A.M.D., S.O.P.

Writing (original draft): E.C.S.

Writing (review and editing): E.C.S., W.Z., P.J.N., S.E., J.M.F., A.M.D., S.O.P.

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 21. September 2022

Angenommen: 21. Februar 2023

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
06. April 2023

• References

• 1 Guerra AB, Lyons GD, Dupin CL, Metzinger SE. Advantages of perforator flaps in reconstruction of complex defects of the head and neck. Ear Nose Throat J 2005; 84 (07) 441-447
• 2 Butler PD, Wu LC. Abdominal perforator vs. muscle sparing flaps for breast reconstruction. Gland Surg 2015; 4 (03) 212-221
• 3 Saldanha IJ, Broyles JM, Adam GP. et al. Autologous reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2022; 10 (03) e4181
• 4 Plastic Surgery Statistics | American Society of Plastic Surgeons. Accessed August 22, 2022 at: https://www.plasticsurgery.org/news/plastic-surgery-statistics
• 5 Busic V, Das-Gupta R, Mesic H, Begic A. The deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for breast reconstruction, the learning curve explored. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2006; 59 (06) 580-584
• 6 Ireton JE, Lakhiani C, Saint-Cyr M. Vascular anatomy of the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 134 (05) 810e-821e
• 7 Fresh Cadaver Flap Dissection Course | Duke Department of Surgery. Accessed August 14, 2022 at: https://surgery.duke.edu/education-and-training/continuing-medical-education/courses/plastic-surgery/fresh-cadaver-flap-dissection-course
• 8 Loh CYY, Wang AYL, Tiong VTY. et al. Animal models in plastic and reconstructive surgery simulation-a review. J Surg Res 2018; 221: 232-245
• 9 Zeng W, Gunderson KA, Sanchez RJ. et al. The blue-blood porcine chest wall: a novel microsurgery training simulator for internal mammary vessel dissection and anastomosis. J Reconstr Microsurg 2021; 37 (04) 353-356
• 10 Zeng W, Shulzhenko NO, Feldman CC, Dingle AM, Poore SO. “Blue-blood”- infused chicken thigh training model for microsurgery and supermicrosurgery. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2018; 6 (04) e1695
• 11 Nistor A, Jiga LP, Miclaus GD, Hoinoiu B, Matusz P, Ionac ME. Experimental swine models for perforator flap dissection in reconstructive microsurgery. PLoS One 2022; 17 (04) e0266873
• 12 Heitmann C, Felmerer G, Durmus C, Matejic B, Ingianni G. Anatomical features of perforator blood vessels in the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap. Br J Plast Surg 2000; 53 (03) 205-208
• 13 Erić M, Ravnik D, Žic R. et al. Deep inferior epigastric perforator flap: an anatomical study of the perforators and local vascular differences. Microsurgery 2012; 32 (01) 43-49
• 14 Colohan S, Maia M, Langevin CJ. et al. The short- and ultrashort-pedicle deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 129 (02) 331-340
• 15 Lam DL, Mitsumori LM, Neligan PC, Warren BH, Shuman WP, Dubinsky TJ. Pre-operative CT angiography and three-dimensional image post processing for deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstructive surgery. Br J Radiol 2012; 85 (1020): e1293-e1297
• 16 Kim YC, Jo T, Hur J, Han HH, Kim EK, Eom JS. Intramuscular deep inferior epigastric vessels are insulated by perimysial fibroadipose tissue network. J Reconstr Microsurg 2022; 38 (08) 664-670
• 17 Roggio T, Pignatti M, Cajozzo M. et al. Porcine model for deep superior epigastric artery perforator flap harvesting: anatomy and technique. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2018; 6 (02) e1659
• 18 Curzer HJ, Perry G, Wallace MC, Perry D. The three Rs of animal research: what they mean for the institutional animal care and use committee and why. Sci Eng Ethics 2016; 22 (02) 549-565
• 19 Stefanidis D, Yonce TC, Green JM, Coker AP. Cadavers versus pigs: which are better for procedural training of surgery residents outside the OR?. Surgery 2013; 154 (01) 34-37
• 20 Manna F, Guarneri GF, Re Camilot MDE, Parodi PC. An easy and cheap way of staining the arterial supply of the face: a preclinical study of visualization of facial vascular territories in human cadavers. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2010; 38 (03) 211-213
• 21 Alvernia JE, Pradilla G, Mertens P, Lanzino G, Tamargo RJ. Latex injection of cadaver heads: technical note. Neurosurgery 2010; 67 (2, Suppl Operative): 362-367
• 22 Doomernik DE, Kruse RR, Reijnen MMPJ, Kozicz TL, Kooloos JGM. A comparative study of vascular injection fluids in fresh-frozen and embalmed human cadaver forearms. J Anat 2016; 229 (04) 582-590
• 23 Bergeron L, Tang M, Morris SF. A review of vascular injection techniques for the study of perforator flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 117 (06) 2050-2057
• 24 Chouari TAM, Lindsay K, Bradshaw E. et al. An enhanced fresh cadaveric model for reconstructive microsurgery training. Eur J Plast Surg 2018; 41 (04) 439-446
• 25 Bravo MG, Granoff MD, Johnson AR, Lee BT. Development of a new large-animal model for composite face and whole-eye transplantation: a novel application for anatomical mapping using indocyanine green and liquid latex. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020; 145 (01) 67e-75e