Subscribe to RSS
![](/products/assets/desktop/img/oa-logo.png)
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1770963
A New Clinical Classification for Gynecomastia Management and Predictive Outcome
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/10.1055-s-00042863/202304/lookinside/thumbnails/10-1055-s-0043-1770963_2251755-1.jpg)
Abstract
Aim and objectives The aim of this study is to propose a new clinical classification for gynecomastia management based on our experience.
Introduction We believe that the prevalent gynecomastia classifications need to be more detailed. Several key aspects that we noticed have either been incompletely represented or not mentioned at all, leaving them unclassified.
Materials and Methods This study was conducted at the authors' center over 24 months from May 2020 to May 2022, and included 1,571 patients who were classified and treated as per our new classifications and small iterations were done to strengthen the classification.
Results We were able to better classify our patients and previously unclassified situations. Skin sagging or a potential for skin sagging and puffy nipples were managed better. This classification allowed recommendation of each step of the procedure, resulting in high patient satisfaction, as all problem areas were sorted and outcome that was explained to them preoperatively was clearly visible postoperatively.
Conclusion The new clinical classification for gynecomastia is a simple, clinical, straightforward, comprehensive, grading system, the use of which has helped the authors and the team in achieving precise and predictable results while ensuring patient satisfaction.
Publication History
Article published online:
28 July 2023
© 2023. Association of Plastic Surgeons of India. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
-
References
- 1 Ratnam BV. A new classification and treatment protocol for gynecomastia. Aesthet Surg J 2009; 29 (01) 26-31
- 2 Raheem AA, Zaghloul AS. The impact and management of gynaecomastia in Klinefelter syndrome. Front Reprod Health 2021; 3: 629673
- 3 Narula HS, Carlson HE. Gynaecomastia: pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2014; 10 (11) 684-698
- 4 Cigna E, Tarallo M, Fino P, De Santo L, Scuderi N. Surgical correction of gynecomastia in thin patients. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2011; 35 (04) 439-445
- 5 Arya R, Rathi AK, Singh K. et al. Gynecomastia: a review of literature. MAMC J Med Sci 2016; 2: 69-75
- 6 Simon BE, Hoffman S, Kahn S. Classification and surgical correction of gynecomastia. Plast Reconstr Surg 1973; 51 (01) 48-52
- 7 Rohrich RJ, Ha RY, Kenkel JM, Adams Jr WP. Classification and management of gynecomastia: defining the role of ultrasound-assisted liposuction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003; 111 (02) 909-923 , discussion 924–925
- 8 Niewoehner CB, Schorer AE. Gynaecomastia and breast cancer in men. BMJ 2008; 336 (7646): 709-713
- 9 Barros AC, Sampaio MdeC. Gynecomastia: physiopathology, evaluation and treatment. Sao Paulo Med J 2012; 130 (03) 187-197
- 10 Gusenoff JA, Coon D, Rubin JP. Pseudogynecomastia after massive weight loss: detectability of technique, patient satisfaction, and classification. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 122 (05) 1301-1311
- 11 de Luis DA, Aller R, Cuellar LA, Terroba C, Romero E. Anabolizantes esteroideos y ginecomastia. Revision de la literatura. An Med Interna 2001; Sep; 18 (09) 489-491