CC BY 4.0 · European Journal of General Dentistry 2024; 13(01): 041-050
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1777862
Original Article

Biomechanical Analysis of Mandibular Premolar Restored with Different Custom Post Core

1   Department of Prosthodontics with Dental Implantology, Faculty of Dentistry with Dental Clinical Center, University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
,
2   Department of Restorative Dentistry with Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry with Dental Clinical Center, University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
,
3   Department of Production Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Tuzla, Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina
,
3   Department of Production Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Tuzla, Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina
,
1   Department of Prosthodontics with Dental Implantology, Faculty of Dentistry with Dental Clinical Center, University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
,
1   Department of Prosthodontics with Dental Implantology, Faculty of Dentistry with Dental Clinical Center, University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
,
1   Department of Prosthodontics with Dental Implantology, Faculty of Dentistry with Dental Clinical Center, University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
,
4   Department of Radiological Technology, Faculty of Health Studies, University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
,
5   Department of Preventive Dentistry and Pedodontics, Faculty of Dentistry with Dental Clinical Center, University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
› Author Affiliations

Funding Information No funding was received for this article.

Abstract

Objective This study investigated biomechanical behavior of custom post core made of six different materials on the tooth with and without the ferrule under different occlusal load.

Materials and Methods Three-dimensional models of mandibular first premolar, with and without ferrule, reconstructed from micro-computed tomography image are restored with different custom post core and zirconia crowns. By using the finite element analysis, von Mises stress shown in MPa was measured under simulated axial and oblique load of 200 [N]. To compare the stress distribution, six different custom post core materials were chosen: zirconia, Ni-Cr alloy, gold alloy, glass fiber-polyether ether ketone, polyether ether ketone, and carbon fiber-polyether ether ketone.

Results Custom post cores with a higher modulus of elasticity showed higher measured stress in the posts, but less stress in dentin. Measured stress in custom post core under oblique loading was approximately three times higher compared with axial loading. Stress in custom post core and in dentin under both types of loads was slightly higher in teeth without ferrule effect.

Conclusion The use of custom cast post cores made of different alloys is recommended in restoration of endodontically treated teeth, with extensive loss of tooth structure especially in teeth without ferrule effect.

Authors' Contributions

All authors have equally contributed to the concept and design of the study, analysis, and interpretation of the data, literature search, and writing the manuscript. All authors have revised the manuscript critically for important intellectual content, and all authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.




Publication History

Article published online:
21 February 2024

© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Mannocci F, Bitter K, Sauro S, Ferrari P, Austin R, Bhuva B. Present status and future directions: the restoration of root filled teeth. Int Endod J 2022; 55 (Suppl 4, Suppl (Suppl. 04) 1059-1084
  • 2 Ferrari M, Pontoriero DIK, Ferrari Cagidiaco E, Carboncini F. Restorative difficulty evaluation system of endodontically treated teeth. J Esthet Restor Dent 2022; 34 (01) 65-80
  • 3 Morgano SM, Brackett SE. Foundation restorations in fixed prosthodontics: current knowledge and future needs. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 82 (06) 643-657
  • 4 Ćatović A, Seifert D, Poljak-Guberina R, Kvasnička B. Influence of biomechanical factors on restoration of devitalized teeth. Acta Stomatol Croat 2000; 34 (01) 67-72
  • 5 Zhou L, Wang Q. Comparison of fracture resistance between cast posts and fiber posts: a meta-analysis of literature. J Endod 2013; 39 (01) 11-15
  • 6 Bergman B, Lundquist P, Sjögren U, Sundquist G. Restorative and endodontic results after treatment with cast posts and cores. J Prosthet Dent 1989; 61 (01) 10-15
  • 7 Shamseddine L, Chaaban F. Impact of a core ferrule design on fracture resistance of teeth restored with cast post and core. Adv Med 2016; 2016: 5073459
  • 8 Cohen S, Hargreaves KM. Pathways of the Pulp. 12th ed. Mosby New York, NY: Elsevier USA; 2020
  • 9 Assiri AYK, Saafi J, Al-Moaleem MM, Mehta V. Ferrule effect and its importance in restorative dentistry: a literature review. J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol 2022; 29 (04) e69-e82
  • 10 Meng Q, Ma Q, Wang T, Chen Y. An in vitro study evaluating the effect of ferrule design on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated mandibular premolars after simulated crown lengthening or forced eruption methods. BMC Oral Health 2018; 18 (01) 83
  • 11 Jafari S, Alihemmati M, Ghomi AJ, Shayegh SS, Kargar K. Stress distribution of esthetic posts in the restored maxillary central incisor: three-dimensional finite-element analysis. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2021; 18: 10
  • 12 Sorensen JA, Engelman MJ. Ferrule design and fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1990; 63 (05) 529-536
  • 13 Jotkowitz A, Samet N. Rethinking ferrule–a new approach to an old dilemma. Br Dent J 2010; 209 (01) 25-33
  • 14 Juloski J, Radovic I, Goracci C, Vulicevic ZR, Ferrari M. Ferrule effect: a literature review. J Endod 2012; 38 (01) 11-19
  • 15 Lee KS, Shin JH, Kim JE. et al. Biomechanical evaluation of a tooth restored with high performance polymer PEKK post-core system: a 3D finite element analysis. BioMed Res Int 2017; 2017: 1373127 Erratum in: Biomed Res Int. 2017; 2017:7196847. PMID: 28386547; PMCID: PMC5366183
  • 16 Lanza A, Aversa R, Rengo S, Apicella D, Apicella A. 3D FEA of cemented steel, glass and carbon posts in a maxillary incisor. Dent Mater 2005; 21 (08) 709-715
  • 17 Dejak B, Młotkowski A. Finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of cast posts compared to glass fiber-reinforced composite resin posts in anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 2011; 105 (02) 115-126
  • 18 Raedel M, Fiedler C, Jacoby S, Boening KW. Survival of teeth treated with cast post and cores: a retrospective analysis over an observation period of up to 19.5 years. J Prosthet Dent 2015; 114 (01) 40-45
  • 19 Valderhaug J, Jokstad A, Ambjørnsen E, Norheim PW. Assessment of the periapical and clinical status of crowned teeth over 25 years. J Dent 1997; 25 (02) 97-105
  • 20 Shetty PP, Meshramkar R, Patil KN, Nadiger RK. A finite element analysis for a comparative evaluation of stress with two commonly used esthetic posts. Eur J Dent 2013; 7 (04) 419-422
  • 21 Khadar S, Sapkale K, Patil PG, Abrar S, Ramugade M, Huda F. Fracture Resistance and stress distribution pattern of different posts-core systems in immature teeth: an in vitro study and 3D finite element analysis. Int J Dent 2022; 2022: 2610812
  • 22 Pegoretti A, Fambri L, Zappini G, Bianchetti M. Finite element analysis of a glass fibre reinforced composite endodontic post. Biomaterials 2002; 23 (13) 2667-2682
  • 23 Schwitalla AD, Abou-Emara M, Spintig T, Lackmann J, Müller WD. Finite element analysis of the biomechanical effects of PEEK dental implants on the peri-implant bone. J Biomech 2015; 48 (01) 1-7
  • 24 Tiwari A, Sethuraman R, Patel V. Computer-aided design computer-aided manufacturing fabricated polyetheretherketone post and core restoration. Int J Oral Care Res 2018; 5 (01) S101-S105
  • 25 Jain V, Vijay Kumar R, Prakash P, Shankar VU. Role of PEEK biomaterial in prosthodontics: a literature review. IP Ann Prosthodont Restor Dent 2019; 5 (03) 63-67
  • 26 Zoidis P, Bakiri E, Papathanasiou I, Zappi A. Modified PEEK as an alternative crown framework material for weak abutment teeth: a case report. Gen Dent 2017; 65 (05) 37-40
  • 27 Zhao T, Jiang Z, Ge Y. et al. Mechanical properties, biosafety, and shearing bonding strength of glass fiber-reinforced PEEK composites used as post-core materials. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2023; 145: 106047
  • 28 Papathanasiou I, Kamposiora P, Papavasiliou G, Ferrari M. The use of PEEK in digital prosthodontics: a narrative review. BMC Oral Health 2020; 20 (01) 217
  • 29 Qin L, Yao S, Zhao J. et al. Review on development and dental applications of polyetheretherketone-based biomaterials and restorations. Materials (Basel) 2021; 14 (02) 408
  • 30 Nahar R, Mishra SK, Chowdhary R. Evaluation of stress distribution in an endodontically treated tooth restored with four different post systems and two different crowns- a finite element analysis. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res 2020; 10 (04) 719-726
  • 31 Abdulsamee N. PEEK biomaterial use for chairside CAD/CAM dental restorations: bridging the gap to future. J Dent Sci 2021; 6 (02) 000297
  • 32 Jakupović S, Anić I, Ajanović M. et al. Biomechanics of cervical tooth region and noncarious cervical lesions of different morphology; three-dimensional finite element analysis. Eur J Dent 2016; 10 (03) 413-418
  • 33 Jakupovic S, Cerjakovic E, Topcic A, Ajanovic M, Prcic AK, Vuković A. Analysis of the abfraction lesions formation mechanism by the finite element method. Acta Inform Med 2014; 22 (04) 241-245
  • 34 Alwadai MHD. Restorative materials for non-carious cervical lesions: a review. Int J Clin Dent Sci. 2018; 7: 1-5
  • 35 Jakupović S, Šehić A, Julardžija F. et al. The influence of different occlusal loading on six restorative materials for restoration of abfraction lesions-finite element analysis. Eur J Dent 2022; 16 (04) 886-894
  • 36 Karimi A, Razaghi R, Biglari H, Rahmati SM, Sandbothe A, Hasani M. Finite element modeling of the periodontal ligament under a realistic kinetic loading of the jaw system. Saudi Dent J 2020; 32 (07) 349-356
  • 37 Rees JS. The effect of variation in occlusal loading on the development of abfraction lesions: a finite element study. J Oral Rehabil 2002; 29 (02) 188-193
  • 38 Adanir N, Belli S. Stress analysis of a maxillary central incisor restored with different posts. Eur J Dent 2007; 1 (02) 67-71
  • 39 Li LL, Wang ZY, Bai ZC. et al. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of weakened roots restored with different cements in combination with titanium alloy posts. Chin Med J (Engl) 2006; 119 (04) 305-311
  • 40 Nishioka G, Prochnow C, Firmino A. et al. Fatigue strength of several dental ceramics indicated for CAD-CAM monolithic restorations. Braz Oral Res 2018; 32: e53
  • 41 VITA YZ ® HT (internet). Vita-zahnfabrik (cited 2023 February 09.). Accessed November 29, 2023 at: https://www.vita-zahnfabrik.com/en/VITA-YZ-HT-25900,27568.html
  • 42 Garhnayak L, Parkash H, Sehgal DK, Jain V, Garhnayak M. A comparative study of the stress distribution in different endodontic post-retained teeth with and without ferrule design-a finite element analysis. ISRN Dent 2011; 2011: 102329
  • 43 Sakaguchi RL, Powers JM. Craig's Restorative Dental Materials. New York, NY: Elsevier Health Sciences, 2012
  • 44 Ahmić Vuković A, Jakupović S, Zukić S, Bajsman A, Gavranović Glamoč A, Šečić S. Occlusal stress distribution on the mandibular first premolar - FEM analysis. Acta Med Acad 2019; 48 (03) 255-261
  • 45 Cheng CW, Chen WP, Chien YT, Teng YT, Lu PY, Huang SH, Lin PY, Chiang YC. Biomechanical behavior of cavity design on teeth restored using ceramic inlays: an approach based on three-dimensional finite element analysis and ultrahigh-speed camera. Acta Biomater 2019; 89: 382-390
  • 46 Kumar P, Rao RN. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of stress distribution in a tooth restored with metal and fiber posts of varying diameters: an in-vitro study. J Conserv Dent 2015; 18 (02) 100-104
  • 47 Nokar S, Bahrami M, Mostafavi AS. Comparative evaluation of the effect of different post and core materials on stress distribution in radicular dentin by three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Dent (Tehran) 2018; 15 (02) 69-78
  • 48 Agarwal SK, Mittal R, Singhal R, Hasan S, Chaukiyal K. Stress evaluation of maxillary central incisor restored with different post materials: a finite element analysis. J Clin Adv Dent 2020; 4: 22-27
  • 49 Silva NR, Castro CG, Santos-Filho PC. et al. Influence of different post design and composition on stress distribution in maxillary central incisor: finite element analysis. Indian J Dent Res 2009; 20 (02) 153-158
  • 50 Veríssimo C, Simamoto Júnior PC, Soares CJ, Noritomi PY, Santos-Filho PC. Effect of the crown, post, and remaining coronal dentin on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary central incisors. J Prosthet Dent 2014; 111 (03) 234-246
  • 51 de Andrade GS, Tribst JP, Dal Piva AO. et al. A study on stress distribution to cement layer and root dentin for post and cores made of CAD/CAM materials with different elasticity modulus in the absence of ferrule. J Clin Exp Dent 2019; 11 (01) e1-e8
  • 52 Durmuş G, Oyar P. Effects of post core materials on stress distribution in the restoration of mandibular second premolars: a finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2014; 112 (03) 547-554
  • 53 Eskitaşcioğlu G, Belli S, Kalkan M. Evaluation of two post core systems using two different methods (fracture strength test and a finite elemental stress analysis). J Endod 2002; 28 (09) 629-633
  • 54 Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A, Sahafi A. Finite element analysis of stresses in endodontically treated, dowel-restored teeth. J Prosthet Dent 2005; 94 (04) 321-329
  • 55 Kivanç BH, Alaçam T, Ulusoy OI, Genç O, Görgül G. Fracture resistance of thin-walled roots restored with different post systems. Int Endod J 2009; 42 (11) 997-1003
  • 56 Öztürk C, Polat S, Tunçdemir M, Gönüldaş F, Şeker E. Evaluation of the fracture resistance of root filled thin walled teeth restored with different post systems. Biomed J 2019; 42 (01) 53-58
  • 57 Badami V, Ketineni H, Pb S, Akarapu S, Mittapalli SP, Khan A. Comparative evaluation of different post materials on stress distribution in endodontically treated teeth using the finite element analysis method: a systematic review. Cureus 2022; 14 (09) e29753
  • 58 Sarkis-Onofre R, Fergusson D, Cenci MS, Moher D, Pereira-Cenci T. Performance of post-retained single crowns: a systematic review of related risk factors. J Endod 2017; 43 (02) 175-183
  • 59 Al-Qarni FD. Customized post and cores fabricated with CAD/CAM technology: a literature review. Int J Gen Med 2022; 15: 4771-4779
  • 60 Dejak B, Młotkowski A. The influence of ferrule effect and length of cast and FRC posts on the stresses in anterior teeth. Dent Mater 2013; 29 (09) e227-e237
  • 61 Dérand P, Dérand T. Bond strength of luting cements to zirconium oxide ceramics. Int J Prosthodont 2000; 13 (02) 131-135
  • 62 Kang LL, Chuang SF, Li CL, Lin JC, Lai TW, Wang CC. Enhancing resin cement adhesion to zirconia by oxygen plasma-aided silicatization. Materials (Basel) 2022; 15 (16) 5568
  • 63 Foxton RM, Cavalcanti AN, Nakajima M. et al. Durability of resin cement bond to aluminium oxide and zirconia ceramics after air abrasion and laser treatment. J Prosthodont 2011; 20 (02) 84-92 x.
  • 64 Heikkinen TT, Lassila LVJ, Matinlinna JP, Vallittu PK. Effect of operating air pressure on tribochemical silica-coating. Acta Odontol Scand 2007; 65 (04) 241-248
  • 65 Usumez A, Hamdemirci N, Koroglu BY, Simsek I, Parlar O, Sari T. Bond strength of resin cement to zirconia ceramic with different surface treatments. Lasers Med Sci 2013; 28 (01) 259-266
  • 66 Hallmann L, Ulmer P, Wille S. et al. Effect of surface treatments on the properties and morphological change of dental zirconia. J Prosthet Dent 2016; 115 (03) 341-349
  • 67 Comino-Garayoa R, Peláez J, Tobar C, Rodríguez V, Suárez MJ. Adhesion to zirconia: a systematic review of surface pretreatments and resin cements. Materials (Basel) 2021; 14 (11) 2751
  • 68 Komar D, Bago I, Negovetić Vranić D, Kranjčić J, Brkić B, Carek A. Influence of different surface pretreatments of zirconium dioxide reinforced lithium disilicate ceramics on the shear bond strength of self-adhesive resin cement. Acta Stomatol Croat 2021; 55 (03) 264-279
  • 69 Yamaguchi H, Ino S, Hamano N, Okada S, Teranaka T. Examination of bond strength and mechanical properties of Y-TZP zirconia ceramics with different surface modifications. Dent Mater J 2012; 31 (03) 472-480
  • 70 Lohbauer U, Zipperle M, Rischka K, Petschelt A, Müller FA. Hydroxylation of dental zirconia surfaces: characterization and bonding potential. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2008; 87 (02) 461-467
  • 71 Tango RN, Todorović A, Stamenković D, Karasan DN, Sailer I, Paravina RD. Effect of staining and aging on translucency parameter of CAD-CAM materials. Acta Stomatol Croat 2021; 55 (01) 2-9
  • 72 Chen Z, Li Y, Deng X, Wang X. A novel computer-aided method to fabricate a custom one-piece glass fiber dowel-and-core based on digitized impression and crown preparation data. J Prosthodont 2014; 23 (04) 276-283
  • 73 Hendi AR, Moharrami M, Siadat H, Hajmiragha H, Alikhasi M. The effect of conventional, half-digital, and full-digital fabrication techniques on the retention and apical gap of post and core restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2019; 121 (02) 364.e1-364.e6