Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2024; 37(04): 181-188
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1779497
Original Research

Evaluation of Canine Shoulder Arthroscopy for Anatomical and Safety Considerations

Emily J. Kennedy
1   Department of Clinical Sciences, Auburn University College of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn, Alabama, United States
,
1   Department of Clinical Sciences, Auburn University College of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn, Alabama, United States
,
Ray Wilhite
2   Department of Anatomy, Physiology, and Pharmacology, Auburn University College of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn, Alabama, United States
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Introduction Arthroscopy is a well-established diagnostic modality for various orthopaedic conditions in veterinary medicine. The aim of this study was to describe the relationship of canine shoulder arthroscopy portals to major muscular, ligamentous, and neurovascular structures for anatomical and safety considerations.

Materials and Methods Arthroscopic exploration of 20 adult canine cadaver shoulders was performed. Each shoulder region was dissected layer by layer to the level of the joint. Musculotendinous, ligamentous, and cartilaginous lesions were documented. The distance was measured from each portal to neurovascular structures encountered.

Results Muscular lesions included the deltoideus, cleidobrachialis, omotransversarius, supraspinatus, infraspinatus, and teres minor muscles. The neurovascular structures identified were the omobrachial vein, the caudal circumflex humeral artery, axillobrachial vein, and branches of the axillary nerve. Lesions to the lateral glenohumeral ligament were noted from the caudal instrument portal and the middle arthroscope portal. Iatrogenic articular cartilage injuries were identified on the caudal humeral head and the glenoid.

Conclusion This study supports the safety of lateral shoulder arthroscopy in dogs. Most local neurovascular structures are unaffected with traditional scope portal positions. Musculotendinous lesions are unavoidable due to the extensive muscling surrounding the shoulder but are unlikely to cause severe complications postoperatively.

Note

Content from this study was presented as an abstract at the Veterinary Orthopedic Society Annual Conference; March 11–18, 2023; Big Sky, Montana.


Authors' Contribution

K.M.C. contributed to the conception, study design, acquisition of data, data analysis and interpretation. E.J.K. and R.W. contributed to study design, acquisition of data, data analysis and interpretation. All authors drafted, revised, and approved the submitted manuscript and are publicly responsible for the relevant content.




Publication History

Received: 23 August 2023

Accepted: 09 January 2024

Article published online:
09 February 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Siemering GH. Arthroscopy of dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1978; 172 (05) 575-577
  • 2 Bleedorn JA, Dykema JL, Hardie RJ. Minimally invasive surgery in veterinary practice: a 2010 survey of diplomates and residents of the American College of Veterinary Surgeons. Vet Surg 2013; 42 (06) 635-642
  • 3 Beale B, Hulse D, Schulz K, Whitney W. eds. Arthroscopically assisted surgery of the shoulder joint. In: Small Animal Arthroscopy. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 2003: 23-49
  • 4 McCarthy TC. ed. Shoulder joint. In: Veterinary Arthroscopy for the Small Animal Practitioner. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell; 2021: 36-107
  • 5 Vandevelde B, Van Ryssen B, Saunders JH, Kramer M, Van Bree H. Comparison of the ultrasonographic appearance of osteochondrosislesions in the canine shoulder with radiography, arthrography, and arthroscopy. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2006; 47 (02) 174-184
  • 6 Olivieri M, Ciliberto E, Hulse DA, Vezzoni A, Ingravalle F, Peirone B. Arthroscopic treatment of osteochondritis dissecans of the shoulder in 126 dogs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2007; 20 (01) 65-69
  • 7 Stokes R, Dycus D. The shoulder joint and common abnormalities. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2021; 51 (02) 323-341
  • 8 Deneuche AJ, Viguier E. Reduction and stabilisation of a supraglenoid tuberosity avulsion under arthroscopic guidance in a dog. J Small Anim Pract 2002; 43 (07) 308-311
  • 9 Hoelzler MG, Millis DL, Francis DA, Weigel JP. Results of arthroscopic versus open arthrotomy for surgical management of cranial cruciate ligament deficiency in dogs. Vet Surg 2004; 33 (02) 146-153
  • 10 Plesman R, Gilbert P, Campbell J. Detection of meniscal tears by arthroscopy and arthrotomy in dogs with cranial cruciate ligament rupture: a retrospective, cohort study. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2013; 26 (01) 42-46
  • 11 Pozzi A, Hildreth III BE, Rajala-Schultz PJ. Comparison of arthroscopy and arthrotomy for diagnosis of medial meniscal pathology: an ex vivo study. Vet Surg 2008; 37 (08) 749-755
  • 12 Ritzo ME, Ritzo BA, Siddens AD, Summerlott S, Cook JL. Incidence and type of meniscal injury and associated long-term clinical outcomes in dogs treated surgically for cranial cruciate ligament disease. Vet Surg 2014; 43 (08) 952-958
  • 13 Rogatko CP, Warnock JJ, Bobe G, Verpaalen VD. Comparison of iatrogenic articular cartilage injury in canine stifle arthroscopy versus medial parapatellar mini-arthrotomy in a cadaveric model. Vet Surg 2018; 47 (S1): O6-O14
  • 14 Thieman KM, Tomlinson JL, Fox DB, Cook C, Cook JL. Effect of meniscal release on rate of subsequent meniscal tears and owner-assessed outcome in dogs with cruciate disease treated with tibial plateau leveling osteotomy. Vet Surg 2006; 35 (08) 705-710
  • 15 Meyer-Lendenberg A, Langhann A, Fehr M, Nolte I. Arthrotomy versus arthroscopy in the treatment of the fragmented medial coronoid process of the ulna (FCP) in 421 dogs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2003; 16: 204-210
  • 16 Goring RL, Price C. Athroscopical examination of the canine scapulohumeral joint. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1987; 23 (05) 551-555
  • 17 Van Ryssen B, van Bree H, Vyt P. Arthroscopy of the shoulder joint in the dog. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1993; 29 (02) 101-105
  • 18 Holsworth IG, Schulz KS, Ingel K. Cadaveric evaluation of canine arthroscopic bicipital tenotomy. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2002; 15: 215-222
  • 19 Jardel N, Crevier-Denoix N, Moissonnier P, Viateau V. Anatomical and safety considerations in establishing portals used for canine elbow arthroscopy. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2010; 23 (02) 75-80
  • 20 Cook JL, Cook CR. Bilateral shoulder and elbow arthroscopy in dogs with forelimb lameness: diagnostic findings and treatment outcomes. Vet Surg 2009; 38 (02) 224-232
  • 21 Evans HE, De Lahunta A. Miller's Anatomy of the Dog. 4th ed.. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 2013: 466-467
  • 22 Cortés III I, Warnock JJ, Ranganathan B, Bobe G. Iatrogenic cartilage injury associated with the use of stainless-steel cannulas and silicone-guarded cannulas for canine stifle arthroscopy. Vet Surg 2019; 48 (08) 1456-1465
  • 23 Aoki K, Sek JY, de Paula Freitas F, Bates M, Beaufrere H. Effects of shoulder distraction on canine shoulder arthroscopy. Vet Surg 2021; 50 (02) 375-382