Download PDF
CC BY 4.0 · Eur J Dent
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1785531
Original Article

The Effect of Different Chemical Surface Treatments on the Bond Strength of Resin-Matrix Ceramic Repaired with Resin Composite

Satit Prabriputaloong
1   Division of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Thammasat University, Pathum Thani, Thailand
,
Nantawan Krajangta
1   Division of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Thammasat University, Pathum Thani, Thailand
,
Awiruth Klaisiri 
1   Division of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Thammasat University, Pathum Thani, Thailand
› Author Affiliations Funding This study was supported by the Thammasat University Research Fund of Thammasat University, Thailand, Contract No. TUFT 0064/2566.
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective This study investigates the effect of different chemical surface treatment protocols with different functional monomers of universal adhesives on the shear bond strength between resin-matrix ceramic and resin composite.

Materials and Methods Eighty resin-matrix ceramics (Shofu block HC) were built and designed into eight groups of ten specimens and surface treated with HC primer (HC) and/or three universal adhesives (single bond universal [SBU], Scotchbond universal plus [SBP], and Tetric N-bond universal [TNU]) assigning follows; group 1, nonsurface treated; group 2, HC; group 3, SBU; group 4, HC + SBU; group 5, SBP; group 6, HC + SBP; group 7, TNU; group 8, HC + TNU. A template was put on the specimen center, and then pushed packable resin composite. Mechanical testing machinery was used to examine the samples' shear bond strength (SBS) values. To examine failure patterns, the debonded specimen surfaces were examined by a stereomicroscope.

Statistical Analysis The one-way analysis of variance method was used to evaluate the data, and the Tukey's test was used to determine the significant level (p < 0.05).

Results The highest SBS was obtained in group 6 (39.25 ± 1.65 MPa). Group 1 (4.15 ± 0.54 MPa) had the lowest SBS. Group 6 exhibited the highest percentage of cohesive failure patterns (70%). High SBS values were frequently correlated with the surface treatment groups and the cohesive failure patterns.

Conclusion The application of HC primer prior to the universal adhesive is an alternative protocol for enhancing the repair bond strength between resin-matrix ceramic and resin composite interfaces. Moreover, the application of HC primer prior to the SBP is the best strategy for resin-matrix ceramic and resin composite repairs.

Keywords

adhesive agent - bond strength - surface treatment - universal adhesive


Publication History

Article published online:
14 May 2024

© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Gracis S, Thompson VP, Ferencz JL, Silva NR, Bonfante EA. A new classification system for all-ceramic and ceramic-like restorative materials. Int J Prosthodont 2015; 28 (03) 227-235
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Ferracane JL. Hygroscopic and hydrolytic effects in dental polymer networks. Dent Mater 2006; 22 (03) 211-222
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Paolone G, Mandurino M, De Palma F. et al. Color stability of polymer-based composite CAD/CAM blocks: a systematic review. Polymers (Basel) 2023; 15 (02) 464
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Quek SHQ, Yap AUJ, Rosa V, Tan KBC, Teoh KH. Effect of staining beverages on color and translucency of CAD/CAM composites. J Esthet Restor Dent 2018; 30 (02) E9-E17
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Blackburn C, Rask H, Awada A. Mechanical properties of resin-ceramic CAD-CAM materials after accelerated aging. J Prosthet Dent 2018; 119 (06) 954-958
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Ramos NdeC, Campos TM, Paz IS. et al. Microstructure characterization and SCG of newly engineered dental ceramics. Dent Mater 2016; 32 (07) 870-878
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Kanat B, Cömlekoğlu ME, Cömlekoğlu MD, Culha O, Ozcan M, Güngör MA. Microshear bond strength and finite element analysis of resin composite adhesion to press-on-metal ceramic for repair actions after various conditioning methods. J Adhes Dent 2014; 16 (01) 63-70
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Queiroz JR, Souza RO, Nogueira Junior Jr L, Ozcan M, Bottino MA. Influence of acid-etching and ceramic primers on the repair of a glass ceramic. Gen Dent 2012; 60 (02) e79-e85
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Hagino R, Mine A, Kawaguchi-Uemura A. et al. Adhesion procedures for CAD/CAM indirect resin composite block: a new resin primer versus a conventional silanizing agent. J Prosthodont Res 2020; 64 (03) 319-325
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Limsiriwong W, Klaisiri A, Krajangta N. Effect of anti-COVID-19 mouthwashes on shear bond strength of resin-matrix ceramics repaired with resin composite using universal adhesive: an in vitro study. J Funct Biomater 2023; 14 (03) 158
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Klaisiri A, Krajangta N, Phumpatrakom P, Sriamporn T, Thamrongananskul N. The effect of curing mode in universal adhesive on zirconia and resin cement shear bond strength. J Int Dent Med Res 2021; 14 (03) 896-900
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 12 Klaisiri A, Krajangta N, Thamrongananskul N. The durability of zirconia/resin composite shear bond strength using different functional monomer of universal adhesives. Eur J Dent 2022; 16 (04) 756-760
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Klaisiri A, Maneenacarith A, Jirathawornkul N, Suthamprajak P, Sriamporn T, Thamrongananskul N. The effect of multiple applications of phosphate-containing primer on shear bond strength between zirconia and resin composite. Polymers (Basel) 2022; 14 (19) 4174
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Klaisiri A, Suebnukarn S, Krajangta N, Rakmanee T, Sriamporn T, Thamrongananskul N. The effect of morpholine on composite-to-composite repair strength contaminated with saliva. Polymers (Basel) 2022; 14 (21) 4718
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Fouquet V, Lachard F, Abdel-Gawad S, Dursun E, Attal JP, François P. Shear bond strength of a direct resin composite to CAD-CAM composite blocks: relative contribution of micromechanical and chemical block surface treatment. Materials (Basel) 2022; 15 (14) 5018
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Takahashi N, Yabuki C, Kurokawa H. et al. Influence of surface treatment on bonding of resin luting cement to CAD/CAM composite blocks. Dent Mater J 2020; 39 (05) 834-843
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Abdou A, Takagaki T, Alghamdi A, Tichy A, Nikaido T, Tagami J. Bonding performance of dispersed filler resin composite CAD/CAM blocks with different surface treatment protocols. Dent Mater J 2021; 40 (01) 209-219
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 El Gamal A, Medioni E, Rocca JP, Fornaini C, Muhammad OH, Brulat-Bouchard N. Shear bond, wettability and AFM evaluations on CO2 laser-irradiated CAD/CAM ceramic surfaces. Lasers Med Sci 2017; 32 (04) 779-785
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Yang B, Wolfart S, Scharnberg M, Ludwig K, Adelung R, Kern M. Influence of contamination on zirconia ceramic bonding. J Dent Res 2007; 86 (08) 749-753
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Sresthadatta P, Sriamporn T, Klaisiri A, Thamrongananskul N. Effect of surface treatments on shear bond strength of resin cement to hybrid ceramic materials. J Int Dent Med Res 2021; 14 (01) 125-135
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 21 Spitznagel FA, Horvath SD, Guess PC, Blatz MB. Resin bond to indirect composite and new ceramic/polymer materials: a review of the literature. J Esthet Restor Dent 2014; 26 (06) 382-393
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Reymus M, Roos M, Eichberger M, Edelhoff D, Hickel R, Stawarczyk B. Bonding to new CAD/CAM resin composites: influence of air abrasion and conditioning agents as pretreatment strategy. Clin Oral Investig 2019; 23 (02) 529-538
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Barutcigil K, Barutcigil Ç, Kul E, Özarslan MM, Buyukkaplan US. Effect of different surface treatments on bond strength of resin cement to a CAD/CAM restorative material. J Prosthodont 2019; 28 (01) 71-78
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Yao C, Yu J, Wang Y, Tang C, Huang C. Acidic pH weakens the bonding effectiveness of silane contained in universal adhesives. Dent Mater 2018; 34 (05) 809-818
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Yao C, Ahmed MH, De Grave L. et al. Optimizing glass-ceramic bonding incorporating new silane technology in an experimental universal adhesive formulation. Dent Mater 2021; 37 (05) 894-904
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Leelaponglit S, Maneenacarith A, Wutikhun T, Klaisiri A. The various silane agents in universal adhesives on repair strength of resin composite to resin composite. J Compos Sci 2023; 7 (01) 7
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Jayasheel A, Niranjan N, Pamidi H, Suryakanth MB. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of universal dental adhesives -an in vitro study. J Clin Exp Dent 2017; 9 (07) e892-e896
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Klaisiri A, Phumpatrakom P, Thamrongananskul N. Chemical surface modification methods of resin composite repaired with resin-modified glass-ionomer cement. Eur J Dent 2023; 17 (03) 804-808
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Barbosa DB, Monteiro DR, Barão VA, Pero AC, Compagnoni MA. Effect of monomer treatment and polymerisation methods on the bond strength of resin teeth to denture base material. Gerodontology 2009; 26 (03) 225-231
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Klaisiri A, Maneenacarith A, Krajangta N. et al. Surface modification methods of self-cured acrylic resin repaired with resin composite using a universal adhesive. J Compos Sci 2023; 7 (09) 360
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Guzman A, Moore BK. Influence of surface treatment on bond strength between a heat-activated and a light-activated resin composite. Int J Prosthodont 1995; 8 (02) 179-186
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Gopikrishna V, Abarajithan M, Krithikadatta J, Kandaswamy D. Shear bond strength evaluation of resin composite bonded to GIC using three different adhesives. Oper Dent 2009; 34 (04) 467-471
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Francois P, Vennat E, Le Goff S, Ruscassier N, Attal JP, Dursun E. Shear bond strength and interface analysis between a resin composite and a recent high-viscous glass ionomer cement bonded with various adhesive systems. Clin Oral Investig 2019; 23 (06) 2599-2608
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Alshali RZ, Bukhary DM, AlQahtani MA, Alenazi NO, Alzahrani AH, Alobaid HA. Repair of temporary fixed dental prostheses using a flowable resin composite: effect of material, bonding, and aging. Saudi Dent J 2021; 33 (07) 495-502
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar