Subscribe to RSS
![](/products/assets/desktop/img/oa-logo.png)
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1793818
Students Have Changed; Medical Teachers Should Change Too
Funding None.![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/10.1055-s-00042863/2024S01/lookinside/thumbnails/10-1055-s-0044-1793818_2472969-1.jpg)
Today's students have not just changed incrementally from those of the past, nor simply changed their slang, clothes, body adornments, or styles, as has happened between generations previously. A really big discontinuity has taken place. One might even call it a “singularity” – an event which changes things so fundamentally that there is absolutely no going back. This so-called “singularity” is the arrival and rapid dissemination of digital technology in the last decades of the 20th century.
–Marc Prensky
Apart from being an academic teacher par excellence, a medical college faculty member must take on multifaceted roles including scheduling the annual timetable and serving as syllabus coordinator, clinician, undergraduate/postgraduate internal and external examiner, mentor, facilitator, researcher with good publication, postgraduate dissertation guide, and conference delegate/speaker.[1] Each new generation of students will bring changes to teaching and learning. Medical teachers continually find themselves adapting to the instructional style to account for their interests, struggles, and goals. But one thing that will not change is the trend toward a more digital world. As the educational landscape continues to evolve, teachers are faced with the task of understanding and adapting to the unique characteristics of the Generation Z (Gen Z) students they teach today. Gen Z students possess distinct traits shaped by their experiences with technology, globalization, artificial intelligence, and social media. As teachers, understanding these traits is crucial for fostering an inclusive, engaging, and effective learning environment.
Publication History
Article published online:
20 November 2024
© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
-
References
- 1 Ghonge S, Patil S, Srivastava K, Borgaonkar C. “Medical teacher”: a cool job?—an insight into faculty stress and changing scenarios of medical colleges. Ind Psychiatry J 2023; 32 (Suppl. 01) S283-S284
- 2 Nisar S, Alshanberi AM, Mousa AH. et al. Trend of social media use by undergraduate medical students; a comparison between medical students and educators. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2022; 81: 104420
- 3 Guze PA. Using technology to meet the challenges of medical education. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc 2015; 126: 260-270
- 4 Prensky M. Digital natives, digital immigrants. On Horizon 2001; 9 (Suppl. 05) 1-6
- 5 Mondal H, Mondal S, Swain SM. Preference in PowerPoint presentation among first-year medical students: a nationwide online cross-sectional survey. J Nature Sci Med 2024; 7 (02) 134-139
- 6 Bhattacharya S. Journal as a tool of distance education. Indian J Surg 2020; 82: 759-761
- 7 https://www.youtube.com/c/GKHandSurgery
- 8 Panchbudhe S, Shaikh S, Swami H. et al. Efficacy of Google Form-based MCQ tests for formative assessment in medical biochemistry education. J Educ Health Promot 2024; 13: 92
- 9 Bhattacharya K, Bhattacharya N. Clinical depression among surgeons: is it turning malignant?. J Med Evid 2023; 4: 65-67
- 10 Sharma D, Kumar S. What makes a surgical teacher great?. Indian J Surg 2020; 82: 999-1004