Download PDF
Facial Plast Surg 2000; 16(4): 315-324
DOI: 10.1055/s-2000-15547
Copyright © 2000 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. Tel.: +1(212) 584-4662

Facial Nerve Grading Systems

Gerard H. Chee1 2 , Julian M. Nedzelski2
  • 1Department of Otolaryngology, National University Hospital, Singapore
  • 2Department of Otolaryngology, Sunnybrook & Women's Health Science Centre, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
31 December 2000 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Clinicians require a reliable and sensitive facial grading system to determine the status of facial nerve function postinjury as well as to evaluate the efficacy of treatment outcomes. The method of assessment should be easy to administer, reproducible, clinically relevant, and require little time and expense. The grading system should be sufficiently sensitive to detect changes over time or following treatment. The lack of a universally accepted grading system frequently does not allow meaningful comparison when assessing the effectiveness of treatment protocols for facial nerve injury. The aim of this article is to review most of the previously published facial grading systems. It is our contention that a grading system developed and currently used within our institution appropriately addresses the needs as well as many of the deficiencies of most other grading systems.

KEYWORD

Facial grading system - HB-FGS - BF-LMI - Nottingham - DEFS - S-FGS

REFERENCES

  • 1 House J W. Facial nerve grading systems.  Laryngoscope . 1983;  93 1056-1069
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Botman J WM, Jongkees L BW. The results of intratemporal treatment of facial palsy.  Pract Otorhinolaryngol . 1955;  17 80-100
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 May M. Facial paralysis, peripheral type: a proposed method of reporting (emphasis on diagnosis and prognosis, as well as electrical and chorda tympani nerve testing).  Laryngoscope . 1970;  80(3) 331-390
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Peitersen E. Spontaneous course of Bell's palsy. In: Fisch U, eds. Facial Nerve Surgery, Proceedings: Third International Symposium on Facial Nerve Surgery, Zurich, 1976 Birmingham, AL: Aesculapuis Publishing Co. 1977: 337-343
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 5 Yanagihara N. Grading of facial palsy. In: Fisch U, eds. Facial Nerve Surgery, Proceedings: Third International Symposium on Facial Nerve Surgery, Zurich, 1976 Birmingham, AL: Aesculapuis Publishing Co. 1977: 533-535
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 6 Adour K K, Swanson Jr J P. Facial paralysis in 403 consecutive patients: emphasis on treatment response in patients with Bell's palsy.  Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol . 1971;  75(6) 1284-1301
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Janssen F P. Ouvre de Postoperatieve Facialis-Verlamming. Thesis, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, 1963
  • 8 Stennert E. Facial nerve paralysis scoring system. In: Fisch U, eds. Facial Nerve Surgery, Proceedings: Third International Symposium on Facial Nerve Surgery, Zurich, 1976 Birmingham, AL: Aesculapuis Publishing Co. 1977: 543-547
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 9 House J W, Brackmann D E. Facial nerve grading system.  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg . 1985;  93 146-147
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 10 Brackmann D E, Barrs D M. Assessing recovery of facial function following acoustic neuroma surgery.  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg . 1984;  92(1) 88-93
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Evans R A, Harries M L, Baguley D M, Moffat D A. Reliability of the House and Brackmann grading system for facial palsy.  J Laryngol Otol . 1989;  103(11) 1056
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Rickenmann J, Jaquenod C, Cerenko D, Fisch U. Comparative value of facial nerve grading systems.  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg . 1997;  117(4) 322-325
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Carmines E G, Zeller R A. Reliability and valid assessment. In: Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in Social Sciences Beverly Hills and London: Sage 1979: 07-017
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 14 Landis J R, Koch G G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.  Biometrics . 1977;  33 159-174
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Ahrens A, Skarada D, Wallace M. Rapid simultaneous comparison system for subjective grading scales for facial paralysis.  Am J Otol . 1999;  20 667-671
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Ross B G, Fradet G, Nedzelski J M. Development of a sensitive clinical facial grading system.  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg . 1996;  114(3) 380-386
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Burres S A, Fisch U. The comparison of facial grading systems.  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg . 1986;  112 755-758
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Croxon G, May M, Mester S J. Grading facial nerve function: House-Brackmann versus Burres-Fisch methods.  Am J Otol . 1990;  11(4) 240-246
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Murty G E, Diver J P, Kelly P J. The Nottingham system: objective assessment of facial nerve function in the clinic.  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg . 1994;  110(2) 156-161
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Burres S A. The Standards of normal.  Laryngoscope . 1985;  95 708-714
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Sargent E W, Omar A F, Randall S C. Measurement of facial movement with computer software.  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg . 1998;  124 313-318
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Fisch U, Dobie R A, Gmur A, Felix H. Intracranial facial nerve anastomosis.  Am J Otol . 1987;  8(1) 23-29
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Fisch U. Surgery for Bell's palsy.  Arch Otolaryngol . 1981;  107 1-11
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 24 Ross B G, Nedzelski J M. Reliability and validity of the Sunnybrook facial grading system: new horizons in facial nerve research and facial expression. Proceedings of the VIIIth International Symposium on the Facial Nerve, Matsuyama, Ehime, Japan, April 13-8, 1997: 563-567
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 25 Kayhan F T, Zurakowski D, Rauch S D. Toronto facial grading system: interobserver reliability.  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg . 2000;  122(2) 212-215
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 El-Nagger M, Rice B, Oswal V. Life-size photograph transparencies: a method for the photographic detection and documentation of recovery from facial paralysis.  J Laryngol Otol . 1995;  109 748-750
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Smith I M, Murray J AM, Cull R E, Slattery J. A comparison of clinical and photographic methods of observation.  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg . 1991;  117 906-909
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Yuen K, Inokuchi I, Maeta M. Evaluation of facial palsy by moire topography index.  Otolaryngology Head Neck Surg . 1997;  117(5) 567-572
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Neely J G, Cheung J Y, Wood M. Computerised quantitative dynamic analysis of facial motion in the paralysed and synkinetic face.  Am J Otol . 1992;  13(2) 97-107
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar