Shock Absorption Capacities of Mouthguards in Different Types and Thicknesses

Although sports mouthguards provide protection against trauma, dentoalveolar injuries can still occur with the mouthguards in place. This study examined the effect of mouthguard protection in an in vitro model. A simulated maxilla, out of a polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) arch, containing replaceable resin teeth, was used to assess the performance of different mouthguard designs. “Boil and bite” and custom-fitted mouthguards (ethylene vinyl acetate [EVA]) laminated with hard (polyvinyl chloride [PVC]) or soft labial intermediate EVA layers were fabricated according to manufacturers' instructions. A steel ram was dropped onto the mouthguards at the maxillary incisor region. Changes in voltage, which were induced by a strain gauge at the back of the upper left incisor, were measured with an amplified voltmeter. Data were analysed by ANOVA at a significance level of 0.05. “Boil and bite” and mouthguards layered with silicone or with small hard PVC inserts of 1.5 mm thickness demonstrated less absorption and differed significantly from the other mouthguard systems (p < 0.05). Bilaminated mouthguards with hard PVC inserts of 0.8 mm, 1.5 mm or 2 mm thickness showed no significant differences to those with 1.5 mm thick (EVA) inserts. The absorption rates amounted to 33 % compared with the unprotected tooth.

Key words:

Mouthguard, mouthguard thicknesses, absorption capacities.

References

• 1 ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials) .Standard practice for care and use of mouthguards. Philadelphia; ASTM 1986 F 697/80
• 2 Chapman P J. Attitudes to mouthguards and prevalence of orofacial injuries in four teams competing at the second Rugby World Cup.  Br J Sports Med. 1993;  27 197-199
• 3 De Wet F A. The prevention of orofacial sports injuries in the adolescent.  Int Dent J. 1981;  31 313-319
• 4 De Young A K, Robinson E, Godwin W C. Comparing comfort and wearability cutsom-made vs. self adapted mouthguards.  J Am Dent Assoc. 1994;  125 1112-1118
• 5 Fabra-Campos H, Dalmases F, Buendia M, Cibrian R. Dynamic resistance of teeth: Technical considerations and applications of an experimental device.  Endod Dent Traumatol. 1991;  7 10-14
• 6 Flanders R A, Bhat M. The incidence of orofacial injuries in sports, a pilot study in Illinois.  J Am Dent Assoc. 1995;  126 491-496
• 7 Fock N. Efficiency of mouthguards in anaesthesia. Cologne; Med Diss 1994
• 8 Jennings D C. Injuries sustained by users and non-users of gum shield in local rugby union.  Br J Sports Med. 1990;  24 159-165
• 9 Johnston T, Messer L B. An in vitro study of the efficacy of mouthguard protection for dentoalveolar injuries in decidous and mixed conditions.  Endod Dent Traumatol. 1996;  12 277-285
• 10 Kerr I L. Mouth guards for the prevention of injuries in contact sports.  Sports Med. 1986;  3 415-427
• 11 Lancaster D M, Ranalli D N. Comparative evaluation of college football officials' attitudes toward NCAA mouthguard regulations and player compliance.  Pediatr Dent. 1993;  15 398-402
• 12 Miller M, Truhe T F. Mouthguard use should be encouraged for many sports.  Dentistry. 1991;  11 21-22
• 13 Oikarinen K S. Causes and types of traumatic tooth injuries treated in a public dental health clinic.  Endod Dent Traumatol. 1987;  3 172-177
• 14 Park J B, Shaull K L, Overton B, Donly K. Improving mouth guards.  J Prosthet Dent. 1994;  72 373-380
• 15 Porter M, O'Brien M. The “Buy-Max” Mouthguard: Oral, Peri-Oral and Cerebral Protection for Contact Sports.  J Ir Dental Assoc. 1993;  40 98-101
• 16 Ranalli D N. Prevention of craniofacial injuries in football.  Dent Clin North Am. 1991;  35 627-645
• 17 Ranalli D N, Lancaster D M. Attitudes of college football officials regarding NCAA mouthguard regulations and player compliance.  J Public Health Dent. 1993;  53 96-100
• 18 Ranalli D N, Lancaster D M. Attitudes of college football officials regarding NCAA mouthguard regulations and player compliance.  J Public Health Dent. 1993;  53 139-142
• 19 Rodd H D, Chesham D J. Sports-related oral injury and mouthguard use among Sheffield school children.  Community Dent Health. 1997;  14 25-30
• 20 Sane J, Ylipaavalniemi P. Dental trauma in contact team sports.  Endod Dent Traumatol. 1988;  4 164-169
• 21 Schwanzer A S. Comparing experimental study of different mouthguard applications at a multiband equipped with a jaw model. Tübingen; Med Diss 1997
• 22 Watermeyer G J, Thomas C J, Jooste C H. The protective potential of mouthguards.  J Dent Assoc S Afr. 1985;  40 173-177
• 23 Westerman B, Stringfellow P M, Ecclestone J A. An improved mouthguard material.  Aust Dent J. 1997;  42 189-191
• 24 Westerman B, Stringfellow P M, Ecclestone J A. Forces transmitted through EVA mouthguard materials of different types and thickness.  Aust Dent J. 1995;  40 389-391
• 25 Woodsmansey K F. Athletic mouthguards prevent orofacial injuries.  Am Coll Health. 1997;  45 179-182