Comparing Open Surgery with Endoscopic Releasing in the Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study is to retrospectively assess the complications and result of cases that underwent open surgery or endoscopic releasing for carpel tunnel syndrome.

Method: A total of 50 cases of carpel tunnel syndrome, 30 of whom underwent endoscopic release using the biportal extrabursal technique described by Chow, and the other 20 that underwent open surgery were included in the study. Average age of the cases was 41 (24 - 62), 44 of them were females and 6 males.

Results: Follow-up examinations of the patients at the first and third month after operation revealed no limitation of activity in 40 (80 %) cases, minimal limitation in 4 (8 %), moderate limitation in 5 (10 %) and significant limitation in 1 (2 %). Among the group that underwent endoscopic release, as a major complication, the median nerve was almost totally cut in a patient undergoing endoscopic release. During the same operation setting perifascicular neurorrhaphy was done. Fourth and fifth digital nerve lesions occurred in three cases. Among the group that underwent open surgery fourth and fifth digital nerve injury occurred in one case, and in another case severe inflammation requiring reoperation occurred.

Conclusion: Before intervention, cases of carpal tunnel syndrome should be examined well as regards which technique to use. Experience of the surgeon with the technique to be used should also be taken into consideration. Endoscopic carpal tunnel releasing, though a relatively easier procedure, leads to neurovascular injuries more frequently than open surgery; thus open surgery appears to be safer.

Key words

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome - Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Releasing - Open Surgery

References

• 1 Pfefffer G B, Gelberman R H, Boyes J H, Rydevik B. The history of carpal tunnel syndrome.  J Hand Surg. 1988;  13B 28-34
• 2 Lindsay K W, Bone I, Callander R. Neurology and Neurosurgery Illustrated. Hong Kong: C Livingstone 1991: 433
• 3 Green D P. Diagnostic and therapeutic value of carpal tunnel enjection.  J Hand Surg. 1984;  9 850-854
• 4 Woud M R. Hydrocortisone injections for carpal tunnel syndrome.  Hand. 1980;  12 62-64
• 5 Skoff H D, Sklar R. Endoscopic median nerve decompression: early experience.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994;  94 691-694
• 6 Brown R A, Gelberman R H, Seiler III J G. et al . Carpal tunnel release: a prospective, randomized assessment of open and endoscopic methods.  J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 1993;  75 1265-1275
• 7 Agee J M, McCarroll H R, Tortosa R D, Berry D A, Szabo R M, Peimer C A. Endoscopic release of the carpal tunnel: A randomized prospective multicenter study.  J Hand Surg [Am]. 1992;  17 987-995
• 8 Hallock G G, Lutz D A. Prospective comparison of minimal incision “open” and two-portal endoscopic carpal tunnel release.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995;  96 941-947
• 9 Jacobsen M B, Rahme H A. A prospective, randomized study with an independent observer comparing open carpal tunnel release.  J Hand Surg [Br]. 1996;  21 202-204
• 10 Okutsu I, Ninomiya S, Hamanaka I, Kuroshima N, Inanami H. Measurement of pressure in the carpal tunnel before and after endoscopic management of carpal tunnel syndrome.  J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 1989;  71 679-683
• 11 Ablove R H, Peimer C A, Diaso E, Oliverio R, Kuhn J P. Morphologic changes following endoscopic and two portal subcutaneous carpal tunnel release.  J Hand Surg [Am]. 1994;  19 821-826
• 12 McDonald R I, Lichtman D M, Hanlon J J, Wilson J N. Complications of surgical release for carpal tunnel syndrome.  J Hand Surg. 1978;  3 70-76
• 13 Plancher K D, Idler R S, Lourie G M, Strickland J W. Recalcitrant carpal tunnel: the hypothenar fat pad flap.  Hand Clinics. 1996;  12 337-349
• 14 Palmer D H, Paulson J C, Lane-Larsen C L, Peuleen V K, Olson J D. Endoscopic carpal tunnel release: A comparison of two techniques with open release.  Arthroscopy. 1993;  9 498-508
• 15 Hudson A, Berry H, Mayfield F. Chronic injuries of peripheral nerves by entrapment. In: Youmans JR (Ed). Neurological Surgery, ed 2. Philadelphia: WB Saunders 1982 Vol 4: 2430-2474
• 16 Boeckstyns M EH, Sorensen A I. Does endoscopic carpal tunnel release have a higher rate of complications than open carpal tunnel release?.  J Hand Surg [Br]. 1999;  244 9-15
• 17 Resnick C T, Miller B W. Endoscopic carpal tunnel release using the subligamentous two-portal technique.  Contemp Orthop. 1991;  22 269-277
• 18 Dheansa B S, Belcher J CR. Median nerve contusion during endoscopic carpal tunnel release.  J Hand Surg [Br]. 1998;  23 110-111
• 19 Arner M, Hagberg L, Rosen B. Sensory disturbance after two-portal endoscopic carpal tunnel release. A preliminary report.  J Hand Surg [Am]. 1994;  19 548-551
• 20 Palmer A K, Toivonon D A. Complications of endoscopic and open carpal tunnel release.  Proc Am Soc Surg Hand. 1995;  50 62
• 21 Lee W PA, Strickland J W. Safe carpal tunnel release via a limited palmar incision.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;  2 418-426
• 22 Evans D. Endoscopic carpal tunnel release. The hand doctor's dilemma.  J Hand Surg [Br]. 1994;  19 3-4
• 23 Varitimidis S E, Herndon J H, Sotereanos D G. Failed endoscopic carpal tunnel release.  J Hand Surg [Br]. 1999;  24 465-467
• 24 Özkan I, Güngör Ş, Tugrul Ş, Ekşioglu F. Long term results in endoscopic release of the carpal tunnel.  Arthroplasty Arthroscopic Surgery. 1995;  11 28-29