Synlett 2003(12): 1883-1885  
DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-41474
LETTER
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Bis(oxazolinyl)phenylrhodium(III) Aqua Complex: Efficiency in Enantioselective Addition of Methallyltributyltin to Aldehydes under Aerobic Conditions

Yukihiro Motoyama*, Hisao Nishiyama
School of Materials Science, Toyohashi University of Technology, Tempaku-cho, Toyohashi, Aichi 441-8580, Japan
Fax: +81(92)5837819; e-Mail: motoyama@cm.kyushu-u.ac.jp;
Further Information

Publication History

Received 27 July 2003
Publication Date:
19 September 2003 (online)

Abstract

A simple and general protocol is described for the enantio­selective addition of methallyltributyltin to aldehydes catalyz­ed by chiral (Phebox)RhCl2(H2O) complexes 1 [Phebox = 2,6-bis(oxazolinyl)phenyl]. The reaction can be performed even unde­r aerobic conditions to afford the corresponding optically activ­e homoallyl­ic alcohols in good yields with high enantio­selectivities (90-99% ee).

4

In the presence of MS 4 Å, this catalytic reaction was slightly accelerated but the enantioselectivity was not changed, see ref. [3b]

6

General Procedure for the Catalytic Enantioselective Addition of Methallyltributyltin 3 to Aldehydes Catalyzed by i -Pr-1. To a suspension of MS 4A (125 mg) in CH2Cl2 (1 mL) were added (i-Pr-Phebox)RhCl2(H2O) complex i-Pr-1 (6.1 mg, 0.0125 mmol, 5 mol%), aldehyde (0.25 mmol) and methallyltributyltin (0.375 mmol, 1.5 equiv) at 25 °C. After stirring the reaction mixture for 12 h at that temperature, the reaction mixture was concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was dissolved 5 mL of Et2O, and this solution was treated with a mixture of 1 N HCl (5 mL) and solid KF (ca. 0.5 g) at r.t. for 30 min. The resultant precipitate was filtered off, the filtrate was dried over MgSO4 and concentrated under reduced pressure. Purification by silica gel chromatography (hexane-Et2O = 3:1, then EtOAc as eluent for recovering i-Pr-1) gave homoallylic alcohol, the enantioselectivity was determined by chiral HPLC analysis. 5a: Daicel CHIRALCEL OD-H, UV Detector 254 nm, hexane-i-PrOH = 20:1, flow rate 0.5 mL/min. t R = 13.1 min (S), 14.6 min (R); 5b: Daicel CHIRALCEL OJ, UV Detector 254 nm, hexane-i-PrOH = 30:1, flow rate 0.5 mL/min. t R = 16.9 min (S), 19.1 min (R); 5c: Daicel CHIRALCEL OD-H, UV Detector 230 nm, hexane-i-PrOH = 30:1, flow rate 0.5 mL/min. t R = 20.9 min (R), 22.9 min (S); 5d: Daicel CHIRALCEL OD-H, UV Detector 230 nm, hexane-i-PrOH = 40:1, flow rate 0.5 mL/min. t R = 18.1 min (S), 19.1 min (R); 5e: Daicel CHIRALCEL OD-H, UV Detector 254 nm, hexane-i-PrOH = 20:1, flow rate 0.5 mL/min. t R = 13.5 min (S), 19.2 min (R); 5f: Daicel CHIRALCEL OD-H, UV Detector 254 nm, hexane-i-PrOH = 20:1, flow rate 1.0 mL/min. t R = 10.9 min (R), 20.8 min (S); 5g: The %ee was determined after converting to the benzoate ester. Daicel CHIRALPAK AD, UV Detector 254 nm, hexane-i-PrOH = 200:1, flow rate 0.5 mL/min. t R = 9.4 min (R), 11.2 min (S).

7

5a: [α]D 23 -48.7 (c 0.63, Et2O); lit. [8a] [α]D 20 -19.70° (c 9.90, Et2O) for 40% ee (S); 5b: [α]D 22 -44.5 (c 0.77, benzene); lit. [8b] [α]D 21 -40.4° (c 3.15, benzene) for 88% ee (S); 5c: [α]D 23 -67.9 (c 0.99, CHCl3); 5d: [α]D 21 -49.2° (c 0.61, CHCl3); 5e: [α]D 22 +15.8° (c 0.85, CHCl3); lit. [8b] [α]D 23 +16.6 (c 2.66, CHCl3) for 67% ee (R); 5f: [α]D 22 -19.4 (c 0.26, benzene); lit. [8c] [α]D +19.0 (c 1.44, benzene) for 84% ee (R); 5g: [α]D 20 -3.30 (c 0.79, benzene); lit. [8c] [α]D +4.04 (c 1.93, benzene) for 77% ee (R).