Patient-Controlled Sedation for Colonoscopy: a Randomized Trial Comparing Patient-Controlled Administration of Propofol and Alfentanil with Physician-Administered Midazolam and Pethidine

Background and Study Aims: Patient-controlled sedation (PCS) using propofol and alfentanil provides effective sedation for colonoscopy, with the advantage of a shorter recovery time in comparison with diazepam and pethidine. However, most endoscopy units in the United Kingdom are currently using midazolam (a shorter-acting benzodiazepine) as a sedative agent. This study compares the efficacy of sedation and recovery times between PCS and a combination of midazolam and pethidine.
Patients and Methods: Sixty-seven patients undergoing colonoscopy were randomly assigned prospectively to receive sedation with either PCS, using propofol and alfentanil, or a bolus of midazolam and pethidine. Sedation and pain scores were recorded during the procedure by one specialist nurse. Patients' recollection of pain was recorded after the procedure. Recovery was assessed using number connection tests. The impact on subsequent activities and the level of amnesia, as well as overall satisfaction, were established by telephone call after 24 h.
Results: The sedation method had no impact on the success, difficulty, or duration of the colonoscopy. PCS could be set up by the specialist nurse without affecting the time between cases. Patients in the PCS group recovered significantly faster (median 5 min vs 35 min; P < 0.0001) and left the department more quickly (median 40 min vs 75 min; P < 0.0001). Patients in the PCS group had significantly higher pain scores and significantly more recall than those in the midazolam and pethidine group. All patients were satisfied with the sedation they received.
Conclusions: PCS provides an acceptable alternative to sedation with midazolam and pethidine with the advantage of significantly faster recovery times, which are of relevance in the outpatient setting.

References

• 1 Keeffe E B, O'Connor K W. 1989 ASGE survey of endoscopic sedation and monitoring practices.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1990;  36 S13-18
• 2 Froehlich F, Thorens J, Schwizer W. et al . Sedation and analgesia for colonoscopy: patient tolerance, pain, and cardiorespiratory parameters.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1997;  45 1-9
• 3 MacKenzie N, Grant I S. Propofol for intravenous sedation.  Anaesthesia. 1987;  42 3-6
• 4 Osborne G A, Rudkin G E, Jarvis D A. et al . Intra-operative patient-controlled sedation and patient attitude to control.  Anaesthesia. 1994;  49 287-292
• 5 Carlsson U, Grattidge P. Sedation for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a comparative study of propofol and midazolam.  Endoscopy. 1995;  27 240-243
• 6 Heiman D R, Tolliver B A, Weis F R. et al . Patient-controlled anesthesia for colonoscopy using propofol: results of a pilot study.  South Med J. 1998;  91 560-564
• 7 Roseveare C, Seavell C, Patel P. et al . Patient-controlled sedation and analgesia, using propofol and alfentanil, during colonoscopy: a prospective randomized controlled trial.  Endoscopy. 1998;  30 768-773
• 8 Rudkin G E, Osborne G A, Finn B P. et al . Intra-operative patient-controlled sedation: comparison of patient-controlled propofol with patient-controlled midazolam.  Anaesthesia. 1992;  47 376-381
• 9 Cook L B, Lockwood G G, Moore C M. et al . True patient-controlled sedation.  Anaesthesia. 1993;  48 1039-1044
• 10 Pac-Soo C K, Deacock S, Lockwood G. et al . Patient-controlled sedation for cataract surgery using peribulbar block.  Br J Anaesth. 1996;  77 370-374
• 11 Morley H R, Karagiannis A, Schultz D J. et al . Sedation for vitreoretinal surgery: a comparison of anaesthetist-administered midazolam and patient-controlled sedation with propofol.  Anaesth Intensive Care. 2000;  28 37-42
• 12 Girdler N M, Rynn D, Lyne J P. et al . A prospective randomised controlled study of patient-controlled propofol sedation in phobic dental patients.  Anaesthesia. 2000;  55 327-333
• 13 Roseveare C, Seavell C, Patel P. et al . Patient-controlled sedation with propofol and alfentanil during colonoscopy: a pilot study.  Endoscopy. 1998;  30 482-483
• 14 Ng J, Kong C, Nyam D. Patient-controlled sedation with propofol for colonoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  54 8-13
• 15 Thorpe S J, Balakrishnan V R, Cook L B. The safety of patient-controlled sedation.  Anaesthesia. 1997;  52 1144-1150
• 16 Murdoch J A, Grant S A, Kenny G N. Safety of patient-maintained propofol sedation using a target-controlled system in healthy volunteers.  Br J Anaesth. 2000;  85 299-301
• 17 Bell G D, Charlton J E. Colonoscopy: is sedation necessary and is there any role for intravenous propofol?.  Endoscopy. 2000;  32 264-267
• 18 Graber R G. Propofol in the endoscopy suite: an anesthesiologist's perspective.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  49 803-806