Differences in Physical Fitness and Throwing Velocity Among Elite and Amateur Male Handball Players

Abstract

This study compared physical characteristics (body height, body mass [BM], body fat [BF], and free fatty mass [FFM]), one repetition maximum bench-press (1RM_BP), jumping explosive strength (VJ), handball throwing velocity, power-load relationship of the leg and arm extensor muscles, 5- and 15-m sprint running time, and running endurance in two handball male teams: elite team, one of the world's leading teams (EM, n = 15) and amateur team, playing in the Spanish National Second Division (AM, n = 15). EM had similar values in body height, BF, VJ, 5- and 15-m sprint running time and running endurance than AM. However, the EM group gave higher values in BM (95.2 ± 13 kg vs. 82.4 ± 10 kg, p < 0.05), FFM (81.7 ± 9 kg vs. 72.4 ± 7 kg, p < 0.05), 1RM_BP (107 ± 12 kg vs. 83 ± 10 kg, p < 0.001), muscle power during bench-press (18 - 21 %, p < 0.05) and half squat (13 - 17 %), and throwing velocities at standing (23.8 ± 1.9 m · s^-1 vs. 21.8 ± 1.6 m · s^-1, p < 0.05) and 3-step running (25.3 ± 2.2 m · s^-1 vs. 22.9 ± 1.4 m · s^-1, p < 0.05) actions than the AM group. Significant correlations (r = 0.67 - 0.71, p < 0.05 - 0.01) were observed in EM and AM between individual values of velocity at 30 % of 1RM_BP and individual values of ball velocity during a standing throw. Significant correlations were observed in EM, but not in AM, between the individual values of velocity during 3-step running throw and the individual values of velocity at 30 % of 1RM_BP (r = 0.72, p < 0.05), as well as the individual values of power at 100 % of body mass during half-squat actions (r = 0.62, p < 0.05). The present results suggest that more muscular and powerful players are at an advantage in handball. The differences observed in free fatty mass could partly explain the differences observed between groups in absolute maximal strength and muscle power. In EM, higher efficiency in handball throwing velocity may be associated with both upper and lower extremity power output capabilities, whereas in AM this relationship may be different. Endurance capacity does not seem to represent a limitation for elite performance in handball.

Key words

Muscle strength - muscle power - endurance - arm throwing

References

• 1 Alexander M JL, Boreskie S L. An analysis of fitness and time-motion characteristics of handball.  Am J Sports Med. 1989;  17 76-82
• 2 Baker D. Differences in strength and power among junior-high, senior-high, college-aged, and elite professional rugby league players.  J Strength Cond Res. 2002;  16 581-585
• 3 Banister E W. The caloric cost of playing handball.  Res Quart. 1964;  35 236-240
• 4 Bartosiewicz G, Dabrowska A, Ellasz J, Gajewski J, Trzaskoma Z, Wit A. Maximal mechanical power of lower and upper extremities of man.  Biol of Sport. 1986;  3 47-54
• 5 Bosco C, Luhtanen P, Komi P V. A simple method for measurement of mechanical power in jumping.  Eur J Appl Physiol. 1983;  50 273-282
• 6 Delamarche P, Gratas A, Beillot J, Dassonville J, Rochcongar P, Lessard Y. Extent of lactic anaerobic metabolism in handballers.  Int J Sports Med. 1987;  8 55-59
• 7 Derenne C, Duxton B P, Hetzler R K, Ho K W. Effects of under- and overweighted implement training on pitching velocity.  J Strength Cond Res. 1994;  8 247-250
• 8 Elliott B, Grove R, Gibson B. Timing of the lower limb drive and throwing limb movement in baseball pitching.  Int J Sports Biomech. 1986;  4 59-67
• 9 Fleck S J, Smith S L, Craib M W, Mitchell M L. Upper extremity isokinetic torque and throwing velocity in team handball.  J Appl Sport Sci Res. 1992;  6 120-124
• 10 Hermansen L. Oxygen transport during exercise in human subjects.  Acta Physiol Scand Suppl. 1973;  399 1-104
• 11 Jackson A S, Pollock M L. Generalized equations for predicting body density of men.  Br J Nutr. 1978;  40 497-504
• 12 Jastrezebski Z. Development of anaerobic fitness among male and female handball players in different age groups.  Biology of Sport. 1989;  6 134-138
• 13 Jöris H JJ, Van Muyen A JE, Van Ingen Schenau G J, Kemper H CG. Force, velocity and energy flow during the overarm throw in female handball players.  J Biomechanics. 1985;  18 409-414
• 14 Izquierdo M, Häkkinen K, Gonzalez-Badillo J J, Ibañez J, Gorostiaga E M. Effects of long-term training specificity on maximal strength and power of the upper and lower extremities in athletes from different sports.  Eur J Appl Physiol. 2002;  87 264-271
• 15 Loftin M, Anderson P, Lytton L, Pittman P, Warren B. Heart rate response during handball singles match-play and selected physical fitness components of experienced male handball players.  J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 1996;  36 95-99
• 16 Mikkelsen F, Olesen M N. Handball 82 - 84 (Traening af skudstyrken). Stockholm; Trygg-Hansa 1976
• 17 Muijtjens A M, Jöris H, Kemper H CG, Ingen Schenau Van G J. Throwing practice with different ball weights: effects on throwing velocity and muscle strength in female handball players.  Sports Train Med Rehab. 1991;  2 103-113
• 18 Müller E. Zur Bewegungsübertragung bei Wurfbewegungen. Innsbruck; Institut für Sportwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck 1980
• 19 Newton R U, Murphy A J, Humphries B J, Wilson G J, Kraemer W J, Häkkinen K. Influence of load and stretch shortening cycle on the kinematics, kinetics and muscle activation that occurs during explosive upper- body movements.  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1997;  75 333-342
• 20 Norton K, Olds T. Morphological evolution of athletes over the 20th century: causes and consequences.  Sports Med. 2001;  31 763-783
• 21 Smith J L, Betts B, Edgerton V R, Zernicke R F. Rapid ankle extension during paw shakes. Selective recruitment of fast ankle extensors.  J Neurophysiol. 1980;  43 612-620
• 22 Toyoshima S, Hoshikawa T, Miyashita M, Oguria T. Contribution of the body parts to throwing performance. Nelson RC, Morehouse CA Biomechanics IV. Baltimore, MD; University Park 1974: 169-174
• 23 Wallace M B, Cardinale M. Conditioning for team handball.  Strength & Cond. 1997;  12 7-12
• 24 Weltman A. The Blood Lactate Response to Exercise. Champaign, IL; Human Kinetics 1995: 1-115