ABSTRACT
Interlaboratory and intermethod variation in commercial and in-house tests used for the measurement of anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL) and lupus anticoagulant (LA) limit the diagnostic value of the results from these tests. This short review summarizes published and unpublished guidelines (some developed using consensus procedures) on aCL and LA testing that are aimed at decreasing assay variation.
KEYWORDS
Cardiolipin - consensus guidelines - lupus anticoagulant - recommendation - standardization
REFERENCES
1
Favaloro E J, Wong R CW, Silvestrini R et al..
A multilaboratory peer assessment quality assurance program-based evaluation of anticardiolipin and beta2 -glycoprotein I antibody testing.
Semin Thromb Hemost.
2005;
31
73-84
2
Harris E N, Pierangeli S S.
Revisiting the anticardiolipin test and its standardization.
Lupus.
2002;
11
269-275
3
Favaloro E J, Silvestrini R.
Assessing the usefulness of anticardiolipin antibody assays: a cautious approach is suggested by high variation and limited consensus in multilaboratory testing.
Am J Clin Pathol.
2002;
118
548-557
4
Roberts J M, Macara L M, Chalmers E A, Smith G C.
Inter-assay variation in antiphospholipid antibody testing.
BJOG.
2002;
109
348-349
5
Tincani A, Allegri F, Sanmarco M et al..
Anticardiolipin antibody assay: a methodological analysis for a better consensus in routine determinations-a cooperative project of the European Antiphospholipid Forum.
Thromb Haemost.
2001;
86
575-583
6
Fontaine M, Homburger H A, Nichols W L.
Persistent problems with standardization of immunoassays for anti-cardiolipin antibodies.
Thromb Haemost.
2001;
86
1123-1124
7
Favaloro E J, Silvestrini R, Mohammed A.
Clinical utility of anticardiolipin antibody assays: high inter-laboratory variation and limited consensus by participants of external quality assurance programs signals a cautious approach.
Pathology.
1999;
31
142-147
8
Reber G, Arvieux J, Comby E et al..
Multicenter evaluation of nine commercial kits for the quantitation of anticardiolipin antibodies. The Working Group on Methodologies in Haemostasis from the GEHT (Groupe d'Etudes sur l'Hemostase et la Thrombose).
Thromb Haemost.
1995;
73
444-452
9
Coulam C B, McIntyre J A, Wagenknecht D, Rote N.
Interlaboratory inconsistencies in detection of anticardiolipin antibodies.
Lancet.
1990;
335
865
10
Green D, Hougie C, Kazmier F J et al..
Report of the Working Party on Acquired Inhibitors of Coagulation: Studies of the “lupus” anticoagulant.
Thromb Haemost.
1983;
49
144-146
11
Exner T, Triplett D A, Taberner D, Machin S J.
Guidelines for Testing and Revised Criteria for Lupus Anticoagulants. SSC Subcommittee for the Standardization of Lupus Anticoagulants.
Thromb Haemost.
1991;
65
320-322
12
Exner T, Triplett D A, Taberner D A, Howard M A, Harris E N.
Comparison of test methods for the lupus anticoagulant: International Survey on Lupus Anticoagulants-I (ISLA-1).
Thromb Haemost.
1990;
64
478-484
13
Brandt J T, Barna L K, Triplett D A.
Laboratory identification of lupus anticoagulants: results of the Second International Workshop for Identification of Lupus Anticoagulants. On behalf of the Subcommittee on Lupus Anticoagulants/Antiphospholipid Antibodies of the ISTH.
Thromb Haemost.
1995;
74
1597-1603
14
Brandt J T, Triplett D A, Alving B, Scharrer I.
Criteria for the diagnosis of lupus anticoagulants: an update. On behalf of the Subcommittee on Lupus Anticoagulant/Antiphospholipid Antibody of the Scientific and Standardisation Committee of the ISTH.
Thromb Haemost.
1995;
74
1185-1190
15
Jennings I, Greaves M, Mackie I J et al..
Lupus anticoagulant testing: improvements in performance in a UK NEQAS proficiency testing exercise after dissemination of national guidelines on laboratory methods.
Br J Haematol.
2002;
119
364-369
16
Jennings I, Kitchen S, Woods T A, Preston F E, Greaves M.
Potentially clinically important inaccuracies in testing for the lupus anticoagulant: an analysis of results from three surveys of the UK National External Quality Assessment Scheme (NEQAS) for Blood Coagulation.
Thromb Haemost.
1997;
77
934-937
17
Roussi J, Roisin J P, Goguel A.
Lupus anticoagulants: first French interlaboratory Etalonorme survey.
Am J Clin Pathol.
1996;
105
788-793
18
Arnout J.
Antiphospholipid syndrome: diagnostic aspects of lupus anticoagulants.
Thromb Haemost.
2001;
86
83-91
19
Lawrie A S, Mackie I J, Purdy G, Machin S J.
The sensitivity and specificity of commercial reagents for the detection of lupus anticoagulant show marked differences in performance between photo-optical and mechanical coagulometers.
Thromb Haemost.
1999;
81
758-762
20
Arnout J, Meijer P, Vermylen J.
Lupus anticoagulant testing in Europe: an analysis of results from the first European Concerted Action on Thrombophilia (ECAT) survey using plasmas spiked with monoclonal antibodies against human beta2-glycoprotein I.
Thromb Haemost.
1999;
81
929-934
21
Wong R CW, Favaloro E J, Pollock W et al..
A multi-centre evaluation of the intra-assay and inter-assay variation of commercial and in-house anti-cardiolipin antibody assays.
Pathology.
2004;
36
182-192
22
Wilson W A, Gharavi A E, Koike T et al..
International consensus statement on preliminary classification criteria for definite antiphospholipid syndrome: report of an international workshop.
Arthritis Rheum.
1999;
42
1309-1311
23
Lockshin M D, Sammaritano L R, Schwartzman S.
Validation of the Sapporo criteria for antiphospholipid syndrome.
Arthritis Rheum.
2000;
43
440-443
24
Wilson W A.
Classification criteria for antiphospholipid syndrome.
Rheum Dis Clin North Am.
2001;
27
499-505
25
Moons K GM, Grobbee D E.
When should we remain blind and when should our eyes remain open in diagnostic studies?.
J Clin Epidemiol.
2002;
55
633-636
26
Swets J A.
Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems.
Science.
1998;
240
1285-1293
27
Ransohoff D F, Feinstein A R.
Problems of spectrum and bias in evaluating the efficacy of diagnostic tests.
N Engl J Med.
1978;
299
926-930
28
Giles I P, Isenberg D A, Latchman D S, Rahman A.
How do antiphospholipid antibodies bind beta2-glycoprotein I?.
Arthritis Rheum.
2003;
48
2111-2121
29
Harris E N, Gharavi A E, Patel S, Hughes G RV.
Evaluation of the anticardiolipin antibody test: report of an International Workshop held April 4 1986.
Clin Exp Immunol.
1987;
68
215-222
30
Harris E N.
The second International Anticardiolipin Standardization Workshop/the Kingston Antiphospholipid Antibody study (KAPS) group.
Am J Clin Pathol.
1990;
94
476-484
31
Harris E N, Pierangeli S S, Birch D.
Anticardiolipin wet workshop: Vth International Symposium on antiphospholipid antibodies.
Am J Clin Pathol.
1994;
101
616-624
32
Pierangeli S S, Stewart M, Silva L K, Harris E N.
Report of an anticardiolipin wet workshop during the VIIth International Symposium on antiphospholipid antibodies.
J Rheumatol.
1998;
25
156-162
33
Ichikawa K, Khamashta M A, Koike T, Matsuura E, Hughes G RV.
Beta 2-glycoprotein I reactivity of monoclonal anticardiolipin antibodies from patients with the antiphospholipid syndrome.
Arthritis Rheum.
1994;
37
1453-1461
34
Ichikawa K, Tsutsumi A, Atsumi T et al..
A chimeric antibody with the human gamma1 constant region as a putative standard for assays to detect IgG beta2-glycoprotein I-dependent anticardiolipin and anti-beta2-glycoprotein I antibodies.
Arthritis Rheum.
1999;
42
2461-2470
35
Greaves M, Cohen H, MacHin S J, Mackie I.
Guidelines on the investigation and management of the antiphospholipid syndrome.
Br J Haematol.
2000;
109
704-715
36
Triplett D A.
Antiphospholipid antibodies.
Arch Pathol Lab Med.
2002;
126
1424-1429
37
Wong R CW, Gillis D, Adelstein S et al..
Consensus Guidelines on Anti-Cardiolipin Antibody Testing and Reporting.
Pathology.
2004;
36
63-68
38 Scientific and Standardisation Committee (SSC) of the International Society for Thrombosis and Haemostasis for Lupus Anticoagulants/Phospholipid-Dependent-Antibodies (2003 meeting minutes) .Available at www.med.unc.edu/isth/; select “SSC Official Communications,” then “All 2003 Scientific Subcommittee Reports,” then “Lupus Anticoagulant/Phospholipid-dependent Antibodies Accessed January 5, 2005
39
Favaloro E J, Bonar R, Sioufi J et al..
Multilaboratory testing of thrombophilia: current and past practice in Australasia as assessed through the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia Quality Assurance Programs for Hematology.
Semin Thromb Hemost.
2005;
31
49-58
40 Favaloro E J. Learning from peer assessment: the role of the external quality assurance multilaboratory thrombophilia test process. Semin Thromb Hemost 2005 31: 85-89
41
Cabral A R, Cabiedes J, Alarcon-Segovia D.
Tween 20 detaches cardiolipin from ELISA plates and makes anticardiolipin antibodies undetectable regardless of the presence of beta 2-glycoprotein-I.
J Immunol Methods.
1994;
175
107-114
42
Galli M, Luciani D, Bertolini G, Barbui T.
Lupus anticoagulants are stronger risk factors for thrombosis than anticardiolipin antibodies in the antiphospholipid syndrome: a systematic review of the literature.
Blood.
2003;
101
1827-1832
43
Agopian M S, Boctor F N, Peter J B.
False-positive test result for IgM anticardiolipin antibody due to IgM rheumatoid factor.
Arthritis Rheum.
1988;
31
1212-1213
Dr. Richard C. W Wong
Division of Immunology, Queensland Health Pathology Service, Princess Alexandra Hospital
Woolloongabba, Queensland 4102, Australia
eMail: richard_wong@health.qld.gov.au