RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-870272
Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration of Intramural and Extraintestinal Mass Lesions: Diagnostic Accuracy, Complication Assessment, and Impact on Management
Publikationsverlauf
Submitted 23 December 2004
Accepted after Revision 3 April 2005
Publikationsdatum:
27. September 2005 (online)
Background and Study Aims: The aims of this study were: firstly, to determine the usefulness of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in obtaining tissue diagnosis of intramural and extraintestinal lesions; secondly, to assess the immediate, acute, and 30-day complications in these patients; and thirdly, to assess the impact of the tissue diagnoses on patient management.
Patients and Methods: All EUS-FNAs of extraintestinal mass lesions and intramural gastrointestinal tumors over a 26-month period were evaluated prospectively. The reference standards for the final diagnosis were surgery (n = 20), repeat imaging (n = 12), clinical follow-up (n = 4), or death from disease (n = 2). Four patients were lost to follow-up.
Results: Forty-two consecutive patients (24 men, 18 women; mean age 59.7 years) underwent EUS-FNA of extraintestinal mass lesions and intramural gastrointestinal tumors. Previous attempts at tissue diagnosis had failed in 52.4 % of the patients. The EUS-FNA cytological diagnoses included: 17 gastrointestinal stromal tumors, five esophageal cancers, five rectal cancers, one bronchogenic cyst, one foregut duplication cyst, and 13 other miscellaneous diagnoses. The mean number of passes needed to reach a diagnosis was 3.9 (± 2.2). The mean follow-up period was 13.1 months. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of EUS-FNA of extraintestinal and intramural tumors were 97 %, 100 %, 100 %, 90 %, and 98 %, respectively. No major complications were encountered.
Conclusions: EUS-FNA is a safe and accurate method that can provide a tissue diagnosis in intramural and extraintestinal mass lesions, especially when other modalities have failed. EUS-FNA significantly affects the management of patients by allowing them to be allocated to appropriate treatment and by avoiding the need for more invasive procedures to obtain tissue diagnosis.
References
- 1 Gress F G, Hawes R H, Savides T J. et al . Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy using linear array and radial scanning endosonography. Gastrointest Endosc. 1997; 45 243-250
- 2 Wiersema M J, Vilmann P, Giovannini M. et al . Endosonography-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy: diagnostic accuracy and complication assessment. Gastroenterology. 1997; 112 1087-1095
- 3 Williams D B, Sahai A V, Aabakken L. et al . Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration biopsy: a large single centre experience. Gut. 1999; 44 720-726
- 4 O’Toole D, Palazzo L, Arotcarena R. et al . Assessment of complications of EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001; 53 470-474
- 5 Catalano M F, Sial S, Chak A. et al . EUS-guided fine needle aspiration of idiopathic abdominal masses. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002; 55 854-858
- 6 Eloubeidi M A, Wallace M B, Reed C E. et al . The utility of EUS and EUS-guided fine needle aspiration in detecting celiac lymph node metastasis in patients with esophageal cancer: a single-center experience. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001; 54 714-719
- 7 Chhieng D C, Jhala D, Jhala N. et al . Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy: a study of 103 cases. Cancer. 2002; 96 232-239
- 8 Eloubeidi M A, Chen V K, Eltoum I A. et al . Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy of patients with suspected pancreatic cancer: diagnostic accuracy and acute and 30-day complications. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003; 98 2663-2668
- 9 Kochhar R, Rajwanshi A, Malik A K. et al . Endoscopic fine needle aspiration biopsy of gastroesophageal malignancies. Gastrointest Endosc. 1988; 34 321-323
- 10 Zargar S A, Khuroo M S, Mahajan R. et al . Endoscopic fine needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of gastro-oesophageal and colorectal malignancies. Gut. 1991; 32 745-748
- 11 Wiersema M J, Hawes R H, Tao L C. et al . Endoscopic ultrasonography as an adjunct to fine needle aspiration cytology of the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract. Gastrointest Endosc. 1992; 38 35-39
- 12 Giovannini M, Seitz J F, Monges G. et al . Fine-needle aspiration cytology guided by endoscopic ultrasonography: results in 141 patients. Endoscopy. 1995; 27 171-177
- 13 Matsui M, Goto H, Niwa Y. et al . Preliminary results of fine needle aspiration biopsy histology in upper gastrointestinal submucosal tumors. Endoscopy. 1998; 30 750-755
- 14 Ando N, Goto H, Niwa Y. et al . The diagnosis of GI stromal tumors with EUS-guided fine needle aspiration with immunohistochemical analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002; 55 37-43
- 15 Davila R, Faigel D. Review article: GI stromal tumors. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003; 58 80-88
M. A. Eloubeidi, M.D., M.H.S.
Director, Endoscopic Ultrasound Program · Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology · The University of Alabama in Birmingham
1530 3rd Avenue South - ZRB 636 · Birmingham, AL 35294-0007 · USA
Fax: +1-205-975-6381
eMail: eloubeidi@uab.edu