Chin and Prejowl Augmentation in the Management of the Aging Jawline

ABSTRACT

The effects of aging in the lower face and neck are reflected in the contour of the jawline. Soft tissue atrophy, the formation of jowls, and retrusion of the chin are all age-associated changes that contrast starkly with the smooth harmony of a young lower face. These soft tissue changes in the jawline are exacerbated by the effects of aging on the bony portion of the mandible. Bone resorption of the mandible seen with aging can lead to the development of a hypoplastic mentum and the formation of an anterior mandibular groove. Rhytidectomy serves to address the soft tissue changes from aging but cannot counter the effects of aging on the bony mandible itself. Understanding the effects of bone resorption on the aging mandible allows the facial plastic surgeon to augment the mandible appropriately to achieve a more effective rejuvenation of the lower face. The aging process in the mandible and the development of the prejowl sulcus are reviewed. The use of chin and prejowl augmentation as a valuable adjuvant to facelift surgery is discussed.

KEYWORDS

Aging mandible - prejowl sulcus - prejowl augmentation - chin augmentation - expanded polytetrafluoroethylene

REFERENCES

• 1 Ramirez O M. Mandibular matrix implant system: a method to restore skeletal support to the lower face.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;  106 176-189
• 2 Mittelman H. The anatomy of the aging mandible and its importance to facelift surgery.  Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 1994;  2 301-309
• 3 Sclafani A P, Romo T. Biology and chemistry of facial implants.  Facial Plast Surg. 2000;  16 3-6
• 4 Rubin J P, Yaremchuk M J. Complications and toxicities of implantable biomaterials used in facial reconstructive and aesthetic surgery: a comprehensive review of the literature.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;  100 1336-1353
• 5 Robinson M. Bone resorption under plastic chin implants: follow-up of a preliminary report.  Arch Otolaryngol. 1972;  95 30-32
• 6 Walen R L. Connective tissue response to movement at the prosthesis-tissue interface. In: Sycher M Biocompatible Polymers, Metals, and Composites Lancaster, PA:; Technomics 1983: 73-90
• 7 Romo T, Baskin J Z, Sclafani A P. Augmentation of the cheeks, chin and pre-jowl sulcus, and the nasolabial folds.  Facial Plast Surg. 2001;  17 67-77
• 8 Cohen M S, Costantino P D, Friedman C D. Biology of implants used in head and neck surgery.  Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 1999;  7 17-33
• 9 Neel III H B. Implants of Gore-Tex.  Arch Otolaryngol. 1983;  109 427-433
• 10 Godin M, Costa L, Romo T, Truswell W, Wang T, Williams E. Gore-Tex chin implants: a review of 324 cases.  Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2003;  5 224-227
• 11 Malaisrie S C, Malekzadeh S, Biedlingmaier J F. In vivo analysis of bacterial biofilm formation on facial plastic bioimplants.  Laryngoscope. 1998;  108 1733-1738
• 12 Sykes J M, Strong E B. Mentoplasty.  Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 1999;  7 85-94