Clinical Impact of Conventional Endosonography and Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Aspiration in the Assessment of Patients with Barrett’s Esophagus and High-grade Dysplasia or Intramucosal Carcinoma who have been Referred for Endoscopic Ablation Therapy

Background and Study Aims: Endoscopic mucosal resection and photodynamic therapy are exciting, minimally invasive curative techniques that represent an alternative to surgery in patients with Barrett’s esophagus and high-grade dysplasia or intramucosal adenocarcinoma. However, there is lack of uniformity regarding which staging method should be used prior to therapy, and some investigators even question whether staging is required prior to ablation. We report our experience with a protocol of conventional endoscopic ultrasound staging prior to endoscopic therapy.
Patients and Methods: A total of 25 consecutive patients with a diagnosis of high-grade dysplasia or intramucosal adenocarcinoma in Barrett’s esophagus who had been referred to the University of Chicago for staging in preparation for endoscopic therapy between March 2002 and November 2004 were included in the study. All 25 patients underwent repeat diagnostic endoscopy and conventional endosonography with a radial echo endoscope. Any suspicious lymph nodes that were detected were sampled using endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration.
Results: Baseline pathology in the 25 patients (mean age 70, range 49 - 85) revealed high-grade dysplasia in 12 patients and intramucosal carcinoma in 13 patients. Five patients were found to have submucosal invasion on conventional endosonography. Seven patients had suspicious adenopathy, six regional (N1) and one metastatic to the celiac axis (M1a). Fine-needle aspiration confirmed malignancy in five of these seven patients. Based on these results, five patients (20 %) were deemed to be unsuitable candidates for endoscopic therapy.
Conclusions: By detecting unsuspected malignant lymphadenopathy, conventional endosonography and endoscopic ultrasound with fine-needle aspiration dramatically changed the course of management in 20 % of patients referred for endoscopic therapy of Barrett’s esophagus with high-grade dysplasia or intramucosal carcinoma. Based on our results, we believe that conventional endosonography and endoscopic ultrasound with fine-needle aspiration when nodal disease is present should be performed routinely in all patients referred for endoscopic therapy in this setting.

• 1 Blott W, Devesa S, Kneller R. et al . Rising incidence of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastric cardia.  JAMA. 1991;  265 1287-1289
• 2 Hesketh P, Clapp R, Doos W. et al . The increasing frequency of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus.  Cancer. 1989;  64 526-530
• 3 Pera M, Cameron A, Trastek V. et al . Increasing incidence of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction.  Gastroenterology. 1993;  104 510-513
• 4 Inoue H. Endoscopic mucosal resection for esophageal and gastric mucosal cancers.  Can J Gastroenterol. 1998;  12 355-359
• 5 Levine D. Management of dysplasia in the columnar-lined esophagus.  Gastroenterol Clin N Am. 1997;  26 613-634
• 6 Rusch V, Levine D, Haggitt R. et al . The management of high grade dysplasia and early cancer in Barrett’s esophagus: a multidisciplinary problem.  Cancer. 1994;  74 1225-1229
• 7 Overholt B, Panjehpour M, Haydek J. Photodynamic therapy for Barrett’s esophagus: follow-up in 100 patients.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  49 1-7
• 8 Van den Boogert J, van Hillegersberg R, Siersema P. et al . Endoscopic ablation therapy for Barrett’s esophagus with high-grade dysplasia: a review.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;  94 1153-1160
• 9 Giovannini M, Bories E, Pesenti . et al . Circumferential endoscopic mucosal resection in Barrett’s esophagus with high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia or mucosal cancer. Preliminary results in 21 patients.  Endoscopy. 2004;  36 782-787
• 10 Rösch T, Sarbia M, Schumacher B. et al . Attempted endoscopic en bloc resection of mucosal and submucosal tumors using insulated-tipp knives: a pilot study.  Endoscopy. 2004;  36 788-801
• 11 Vieth M, Ell C, Gossner L. et al . Histological analysis of endoscopic resection specimens from 326 patients with Barrett’s esophagus and early neoplasia.  Endoscopy. 2004;  36 776-781
• 12 Seewald S, Groth S, Brand V. et al . Circumferential EMR - future endoscopic management of HGIN and IMC in Barrett’s esophagus. Preliminary results of an ongoing study?.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;  59 AB101
• 13 Seewald S, Omar S, Groth S. et al . A novel multiband mucosectomy device facilitates circumferential endoscopic mucosal resection in Barrett’s esophagus with early malignant changes.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;  61 AB80
• 14 Ross A, Kinney T, Larghi A. et al . Complete circumferential endoscopic mucosal resection as a treatment for early esophageal carcinoma or Barrett’s esophagus with high-grade dysplasia.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;  61 AB95
• 15 Deprez P H, Aouattah T, Piessevaux H. et al . Can piecemeal mucosectomy completely remove Barrett’s esophagus with high-grade dysplasia or adenocarcinoma?.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;  61 AB129
• 16 Peters F, Kara M, Rosmolen W. et al . Barrett’s esophagus (BE) with high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and/or early cancer (EC): stepwise radical endoscopic resection (SRER) for complete removal of the BE is safe and effective.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;  61 AB140
• 17 Wallace M, Hoffman B, Sahai A. et al . Imaging of esophageal tumors with a water-filled condom and a catheter US probe.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;  51 597-600
• 18 Vazquez-Sequeiros E, Wiersema M. High-frequency US catheter-based staging of early esophageal tumors.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  55 95-99
• 19 Kawano T, Ohshima M, Iwai T. Early esophageal carcinoma: endoscopic ultrasonography using the sonoprobe.  Abdom Imaging. 2003;  28 477-485
• 20 Scotiniotis I, Kochman M, Lewis J. et al . Accuracy of EUS in the evaluation of Barrett’s esophagus and high-grade dysplasia or intramucosal carcinoma.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  54 689-696
• 21 Hawes R. Indications for EUS-directed FNA.  Endoscopy. 1998;  30 Suppl 1 A155-A157
• 22 Wiersema M, Vilmann P, Giovannini M. et al . Endosonography-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy: diagnostic accuracy and complication assessment.  Gastroenterology. 1997;  112 1087-1095
• 23 Rösch T. Endoscopic staging of esophageal cancer: a review of literature results.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1995;  5 537-547
• 24 Botet J, Lightdale C, Zauber A. et al . Preoperative staging of esophageal cancer: comparison of endoscopic US and dynamic CT.  Radiology. 1991;  181 419-425
• 25 Tajima Y, Nakanishi Y, Ochiai A. et al . Histopathologic findings predicting lymph node metastasis and prognosis of patients with superficial esophageal carcinoma: analysis of 240 surgically resected tumors.  Cancer. 2000;  88 1285-1293
• 26 Rice T W, Zuccaro G, Adelstein D J. et al . Esophageal carcinoma: depth of tumor invasion is predictive of regional lymph node status.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;  65 787-792
• 27 Altorki N, Sunagawa M, Little A. et al . High-grade dysplasia in the columnar-lined esophagus.  Am J Surg. 1991;  161 97-100
• 28 Cameron A, Carpenter H. Barrett’s esophagus, high-grade dysplasia, and early adenocarcinoma: a pathological study.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1997;  92 586-591
• 29 Ferguson M, Naunheim K. Resection for Barrett’s mucosa with high-grade dysplasia: implications for prophylactic photodynamic therapy.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1997;  114 824-829
• 30 Hasegawa N, Niwa Y, Arisawa T. et al . Preoperative staging of superficial esophageal carcinoma: comparison of an ultrasound probe and standard endoscopic ultrasonography.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;  44 388-393
• 31 Nesje L, Svanes K, Viste A. et al . Comparison of a linear miniature ultrasound probe and a radial-scanning echoendoscope in TN staging of esophageal cancer.  Scand J Gastroenterol. 2000;  35 997-1002
• 32 Bhutani M, Hawes R, Hoffman B. A comparison of the accuracy of echo features during endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration for diagnosis of malignant lymph node invasion.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1997;  45 474-479
• 33 Fukuda M, Hirata K, Natori H. Endoscopic ultrasonography of the esophagus.  World J Surg. 2000;  24 216-226
• 34 Parmar K, Zwischenberger J, Reeves A. et al . Clinical impact of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of celiac lymph nodes (M1a disease) in esophageal cancer.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;  73 916-920
• 35 Giovannini G, Monges G, Seitz J. et al . Distant lymph node metastases in esophageal cancer: impact of endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy.  Endoscopy. 1999;  31 536-540
• 36 Fritscher-Ravens A, Bohuslavizki K, Brandt L. et al . Mediastinal lymph node involvement in potentially resectable lung cancer. Comparison of CT, positron emission tomography, and endoscopic ultrasonography with and without fine-needle aspiration.  Chest. 2003;  123 442-451
• 37 Larsen S, Krasnik M, Vilmann P. et al . Endoscopic ultrasound guided biopsy of mediastinal lesions has a major impact on patient management.  Thorax. 2002;  57 98-103
• 38 Chen V K, Eloubeidi M A. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration is superior to lymph node echofeatures: a prospective evaluation of mediastinal and peri-intestinal lymphadenopathy.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;  99 628-633
• 39 Shami V M, Parmar K S, Waxman I. Clinical impact of endoscopic ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in the management of rectal carcinoma.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;  47 59-65
• 40 Kinney T P, Waxman I. Does size really matter?.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;  99 634-635
• 41 Falk G W, Catalano M F, Sivak M V jr. et al . Endosonography in the evaluation of patients with Barrett’s esophagus and high-grade dysplasia.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1994;  40 207-212
• 42 Waxman I, Critchlow J, Raju G. et al . Evaluation of patients with Barrett’s esophagus and high-grade dysplasia with a new high-frequency ultrasound probe: a prospective study.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;  49 AB161