Endoscopy 2006; 38(10): 1011-1015
DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-944779
Original article
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

A novel double-channel therapeutic endoscope (“R-scope”) facilitates endoscopic submucosal dissection of superficial gastric neoplasms

J.  Yonezawa1 , M.  Kaise1 , K.  Sumiyama1 , K.  Goda1 , H.  Arakawa1 , H.  Tajiri1, 2
  • 1Department of Endoscopy, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
  • 2Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
Further Information

Publication History

Submitted 30 March 2006

Accepted after revision 3 July 2006

Publication Date:
20 October 2006 (online)

Preview

Background and study aim: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a new and radical treatment for superficial gastrointestinal neoplasms that provides high rates of en bloc resection compared with treatment by conventional mucosal resection. However, ESD is a complex procedure that is associated with long operating times and a higher complication rate. This feasibility study assessed the use of a novel double-channel therapeutic endoscope for performing en-bloc ESD in order to assess whether the procedure time could be shortened.
Patients and methods: The therapeutic endoscope we used (the “R-scope”) is equipped with a multibending system and has two movable instrument channels: one moves a grasping forceps vertically for lesion countertraction; the other swings a cutting knife horizontally for dissection. Twenty consecutive patients (18 men, 2 women; mean age 63 years, range 54 - 80 years) with superficial gastric neoplasms in the distal two-thirds of the stomach underwent resection of their tumor by ESD using the R-scope. Forty size- and location-matched gastric neoplasms resected by conventional ESD were reviewed retrospectively for the purposes of comparison.
Results: The rates of curative en-bloc resection, complications, and local recurrence using the two ESD methods were comparable. The mean ± SD operating time was significantly shorter for ESD using the R-scope than for conventional ESD (57.9 ± 29.7 minutes vs. 92.8 ± 58.9 minutes, P = 0.016).
Conclusion: The R-scope appears to shorten the operating time of ESD with comparable efficacy and complication rates.

References

M. Kaise, M. D.

Department of Endoscopy

The Jikei University School of Medicine · 3-25-8 Nishi Shinbashi · Minato-ku · Tokyo 103-8461 · Japan

Fax: +81-3-5438-8380

Email: kaise@jikei.ac.jp