Power Output Measurement during Treadmill Cycling

Abstract

The study aim was to consider the use of a motorised treadmill as a cycling ergometry system by assessing predicted and recorded power output values during treadmill cycling. Fourteen male cyclists completed repeated cycling trials on a motorised treadmill whilst riding their own bicycle fitted with a mobile ergometer. The speed, gradient and loading via an external pulley system were recorded during 20-s constant speed trials and used to estimate power output with an assumption about the contribution of rolling resistance. These values were then compared with mobile ergometer measurements. To assess the reliability of measured power output values, four repeated trials were conducted on each cyclist. During level cycling, the recorded power output was 257.2 ± 99.3 W compared to the predicted power output of 258.2 ± 99.9 W (p > 0.05). For graded cycling, there was no significant difference between measured and predicted power output, 268.8 ± 109.8 W vs. 270.1 ± 111.7 W, p > 0.05, SEE 1.2 %. The coefficient of variation for mobile ergometer power output measurements during repeated trials ranged from 1.5 % (95 % CI 1.2 - 2.0 %) to 1.8 % (95 % CI 1.5 - 2.4 %). These results indicate that treadmill cycling can be used as an ergometry system to assess power output in cyclists with acceptable accuracy.

SRM - ergometry - gradient - specificity

References

• 1 Atkinson G, Nevill A M. Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine.  Sports Med. 1998;  26 217-236
• 2 Attaway R, Bartoli W P, Pate R R, Davis J M. Physiologic and perceptual responses to exercise on a new cycle ergometer.  Can J Sports Sci. 1992;  17 56-59
• 3 Bassett F A, Boulay M A. Specificity of treadmill and cycle ergometer tests in triathletes, runners and cyclists.  Eur J Appl Physiol. 2000;  81 214-221
• 4 Burke E R, Lagenfeld M, Kirkendall D. Physiological responses to submaximal bicycle exercise: Comparison of rollers and the racer-mate windload simulator.  Aus J Sports Med Exerc Sci. 1982;  14 104-107
• 5 Coast J R, Swain D P, Milliken M C, Clifford P S, Stricker P R, Stray-Gunderson J. Metabolic requirements of riding windload simulators as compared to cycling on the road. Burke E Medical and Scientific Aspects of Cycling. Champaign, IL; Human Kinetics 1988: 109-116
• 6 Davis R, Hull M. Measurement of pedal loading in bicycling.  J Biomech. 1981;  14 857-872
• 7 Davison R CR, Swann D, Coleman D, Bird S. Correlates of simulated hill climb cycling performance.  J Sports Sci. 2000;  18 105-110
• 8 Di Prampero P E, Cortili G, Mognoni P, Saibene F. Equatuion of motion of a cyclist.  J Appl Physiol. 1979;  47 201-206
• 9 Faria I, Dix C, Frazer C. Effect of body position during cycling on heart rate, pulmonary ventilation, oxygen uptake and work output.  Sports Med. 1978;  22 295-299
• 10 Field A. Discovering Statistics: Using SPSS for Windows. UK; Sage 2000
• 11 Firth M S. A sport-specific training and testing device for racing cyclists.  Ergonomics. 1981;  24 565-571
• 12 Hopkins W G. Measures of reliability in sports medicine and science.  Sports Med. 2000;  30 1-15
• 13 Hopkins W G, Sachabort E J, Hawley J A. Reliability of power in physical performance tests.  Sports Med. 2001;  31 211-234
• 14 Jakeman P. A longitudinal study of exercise metabolism during recovery from viral illness.  Br J Sports Med. 1993;  27 157-161
• 15 Jones S A, Passfield L. The dynamic calibration of bicycle power measuring cranks. Haake S The Engineering of Sport. Oxford; Blackwell Science 1998: 265-274
• 16 Keen P S, Passfield L, Hale T. Indirect determination of V·O_2max using a sports-specific (cycle) ergometry system (abstract).  J Sports Sci. 1991;  9 420
• 17 Kenny G P, Reardon F D, Marion A, Thoden J S. A comparative analysis of physiological responses at submaximal workloads during different laboratory simulations of field cycling.  Eur J Appl Physiol. 1995;  71 409-415
• 18 Lockwood P A, Yoder J E, Deuster P A. Comparison and cross-validation of cycle ergometry estimates of V·O_2max.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1997;  29 1513-1520
• 19 Martin J C, Spirduso W W. Determinants of maximal cycling power: crank length, pedalling rate and pedal speed.  Eur J Applied Physiol. 2001;  84 413-418
• 20 Neville A. Why the analysis of performance variables recorded on a ratio scale will invariably benefit from a log transformation (editorial).  J Sports Sci. 1997;  15 457-458
• 21 Paton C D, Hopkins W G. Tests of cycling performance.  Sports Med. 2001;  31 489-496
• 22 Oude-Vrieklink H HE, Vissers A CA, Binkhorst R A. Oxygen consumption and speed of cycling using an air-braked simulator on a hometrainer roller.  Int J Sports Med. 1984;  5 98-101
• 23 Shennum P, de Vries H. The effect of saddle height on oxygen consumption during bicycle ergometer work.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1976;  8 119-121
• 24 Signorile J, Holden S, Coast J R. The feasibility of the windload simulator as an alternative to on-road training.  J Appl Sport Sci Res. 1990;  4 5-8
• 25 Smith M F, Balmer J, Coleman D A, Bird S R, Davison R C. Method of lactate elevation does not affect the determination of the lactate minimum.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002;  34 1744-1749
• 26 Swain D P, Wilcox J P. The effect of cadence on the economy of uphill cycling.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1992;  24 1123-1127
• 27 Tate R F, Klett G W. Optimal confidence for the variance of a normal distribution.  J Am Stat Ass. 1959;  54 674-682
• 28 Van Praagh E, Bedu M, Roddier P, Coudert J. A simple calibration method for mechanically braked cycle ergometers.  Int J Sports Med. 1992;  13 27-30
• 29 Williams C A, James D VB. Science for Exercise and Sport. London; Routledge 2001