J Reconstr Microsurg 2006; 22(8): 617-623
DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-956235
TECHNICAL INNOVATION

Copyright © 2006 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Posterior-Wall-First Continuous Suturing Combined with Conventional Interrupted Suturing for Microvascular Anastomosis

Hideaki Watanabe1 , Kazuki Ueda1 , Masayuki Ohkouchi1 , Akiyoshi Kajikawa1 , Yasutoshi Suzuki1
  • 1Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan
Further Information

Publication History

Accepted: May 1, 2006

Publication Date:
30 November 2006 (online)

ABSTRACT

Vascular anastomosis with conventional interrupted suturing is often difficult to perform when the vascular clamp is not reversed, because of a narrow operative field or a short vascular pedicle. A posterior-wall-first continuous suture technique combined with the standard interrupted suture technique is one method of solving this problem. The authors conducted a comparative study of posterior-wall-first continuous suturing combined with standard interrupted suturing and conventional interrupted suturing in rat vessels. There was no statistically significant difference in patency rates or suturing times. Electron microscopy demonstrated no significant difference in recoverability of the intima. The posterior-wall-first continuous suture technique combined with the standard interrupted suture technique is a useful alternative to the conventional interrupted suture technique.

REFERENCES

  • 1 Harris G D, Finseth F, Buncke H J. Posterior-wall-first microvascular anastomotic technique.  Br J Plast Surg. 1981;  34 47-49
  • 2 Hou S M, Seaber A V, Urbaniak J R. An alternative technique of microvascular anastomosis.  Microsurgery. 1987;  8 22-24
  • 3 Adani A, Castagnetti C, Lagana A, Perretti M, Caroli A. Proposition for a new continuous suturing technique for microvascular anastomosis: a comparative study.  Br J Plast Surg. 1988;  41 506-508
  • 4 Hendel P M, Buncke H J. Use of a tilted double clamp in microvascular anastomosis.  J Microsurg. 1980;  1 470-471
  • 5 Harashina T. Use of a continuous suture for back wall repair of end-to-end or end-to-side anastomoses.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1982;  69 139-144
  • 6 Yamamoto Y, Sugihara T, Sasaki S et al.. Microsurgical reconstruction of the hepatic and superior mesenteric arteries using a back wall technique.  J Reconstr Microsurg. 1999;  15 321-325
  • 7 Chen L, Chiu D T. Spiral interrupted suturing technique for microvascular anastomosis: a comparative study.  Microsurgery. 1986;  7 72-78
  • 8 Morris D J, Pribaz J J. The interrupted-continuous microsurgical suture technique.  Microsurgery. 1992;  13 103-105
  • 9 Schlechter B, Guyuron B. A comparison of different suture techniques for microvascular anastomosis.  Ann Plast Surg. 1994;  33 28-31
  • 10 Hudson D A, Engelbrecht G H, Seymour B, Cruse J P, Hickman R. A modified method of continuous venous anastomosis in microsurgery.  Ann Plast Surg. 1998;  40 549-553
  • 11 Cobbet J. Small vessel anastomosis.  Br J Plast Surg. 1967;  20 17-20
  • 12 Little J R, Salerno T A. Continuous suturing for microvascular anastomosis.  J Neurosurg. 1978;  48 1042-1045
  • 13 Moscona A R, Owen E R. Continuous anastomotic technique in microsurgery.  Israel J Med Sci. 1978;  14 979-983
  • 14 Hamilton R B, O`Brien B M. An experimental study of microvascular patency using a continuous suture technique.  Br J Plast Surg. 1979;  32 153-154
  • 15 Man D, Acland R D. Continuous-suture technique in microvascular end-to-end anastomosis.  J Microsurg. 1981;  2 238-243
  • 16 Peerless S J, Gamache F W, Hunter I G. Continuous suture method for microvascular anastomosis: technical note.  Neurosurgery. 1981;  8 695-698
  • 17 Lee B Y, Thoden W R, Brancato R F, Kavner D, Shaw W, Madden J L. Comparison of continuous and interrupted suture techniques in microvascular anastomosis.  Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1982;  155 353-357
  • 18 Firsching R, Terhaag P D, Muller W, Frowein R A. Continuous- and interrupted-suture technique in microsurgical end-to-end anastomosis.  Microsurgery. 1984;  5 80-84
  • 19 Joos K M, Blair W F, Maynard J A. A histologic comparison of continuous and interrupted microarteriorrhaphy.  Microsurgery. 1985;  6 141-146
  • 20 Wheatley M J, Mathes S J, Hassett C. Comparison of continuous and interrupted suture techniques in microvascular end-to-side anastomosis.  J Reconstr Microsurg. 1986;  2 93-96
  • 21 Mao K, Tang M Y, South J R. A comparison of continuous with interrupted sutures in microvascular anastomosis.  Microsurgery. 1986;  7 158-160
  • 22 Gahankari D R, Lalwani N R, Phatak A M. Classification and comparison of five techniques of end-to-end microarterial anastomoses in rats: a new proposed technique.  Microsurgery. 1995;  16 793-802
  • 23 Chen Y X, Chen L E, Seaber A V, Urbaniak J R. Comparison of continuous and interrupted suture techniques in microvascular anastomosis.  J Hand Surg Am. 2001;  26 530-539

Hideaki WatanabeM.D. 

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Fukushima Medical University

1 Hikarigaoka, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan