Download PDF
Facial Plast Surg 2008; 24(1): 003-010
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-1021457
© Thieme Medical Publishers

The Path of Nasal Reconstruction: From Ancient India to the Present

Haresh Yalamanchili1 , Anthony P. Sclafani1 , 2 , 3 , Steven D. Schaefer1 , 3 , Paul Presti1
  • 1Department of Otolaryngology, The New York Eye & Ear Infirmary, New York, New York
  • 2Division of Facial Plastic Surgery, The New York Eye & Ear Infirmary, New York, New York
  • 3Department of Otolaryngology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
20 February 2008 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Nasal reconstruction, first described over 2600 years ago in India, has undergone several modifications in its development. However, there is a misconception that this surgery began with the forehead flap repair, and the history of the subsequent two and a half millennia is poorly represented in most surgical texts. This article presents a review of the historical significance of nasal injuries in antiquity and the various technical developments along the path to modern nasal reconstruction, from ancient India through medieval Europe to modern England and America. Although written texts from 6th-century BC India through 16th-century AD Europe described pedicle flap repair of nasal defects, it was not until the late 18th century that the first written description of the forehead flap appeared. Forehead flap repair developed on an alternate pathway, being transmitted via an oral tradition, typically within families of craftsmen, at least as early as the 14th century. These ancient authors recognized the need for accurate flap design and sizing, donor site repair, precise tissue apposition, protection of the flap pedicle, hemostasis, deepithelialization of the wound, and replacement of intranasal lining. By appreciating ancient surgical techniques and examining the particular issues these procedures attempted to address, the surgeon will gain an additional and more detailed perspective of nasal reconstruction that will aid in providing excellent care to his patients.

KEYWORDS

Forehead flap - nasal reconstruction - Tagliacozzi - Sushruta - cheek flap

REFERENCES

  • 1 Almast S C. History and evolution of the Indian method of rhinoplasty. In: Sanvenero-Roselli G Transactions of the Fourth International Congress of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. Rome, 1969. Amsterdam; Excerpta Medica Foundation 1969
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 2 Keegan D. Rhinoplastic Operations. London; Bailliere, Tindall & Cox 1900
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 3 Nichter L S, Morgan R F, Nichter M A. The impact of Indian methods for total nasal reconstruction.  Clin Plast Surg. 1983;  10 635-647
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 McDowell F. Editor's commentary: ancient ear-lobe and rhinoplastic operations in India.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1969;  43 515
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Brain D J. The Indian contribution to rhinoplasty.  J Laryngol Otol. 1988;  102 689-693
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Sushruta .Sushruta Samhita. In: Bhishagratna K An English Translation of the Sushruta Samhita, Based on Original Sanskrit Text. Calcutta; Bose 1907
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 7 Goleria K S. Pedicle flaps-a historical review.  Indian J Surg. 1966;  28 247-256
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Von Pfolspeundt H. Buch der Bundth-Ertznei (1460). Haeser H, Middledorpf A Berlin; Georg Reimer 1868
  • 9 Gnudi M, Webster J. The Life and Times of Gaspare Tagliacozzi. Los Angeles; Zeitlin and Ver Brugge 1976
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 10 McDowell F. The Source Book of Plastic Surgery. Baltimore; Williams & Wilkins 1977
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 11 Patterson T J. Mr. Lucas and the “B.L.”  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1971;  48 68-71
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 McDowell F. The “B.L.” bomb-shell.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1969;  44 67-73
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Carpue J C. An Account of Two Successful Operations for Restoring a Lost Nose, from the Integument of the Forehead. London; Longman 1816
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 14 Warren J M. Rhinoplastic operation.  Boston Medical and Surgical Journal. 1837;  61 69-70
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Menick F J. Aesthetic refinement in use of forehead for nasal reconstruction: the paramedian forehead flap.  Clin Plast Surg. 1990;  17 607-622
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Kazanjian V H. The repair of nasal defects with a median forehead flap: primary closure of forehead wound.  Surg Gynecol Oncol. 1947;  83 37-39
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Millard D R. Total reconstructive rhinoplasty and a missing link.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1966;  37 167-183
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Millard D R. Reconstructive rhinoplasty for the lower half of a nose.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1974;  53 133-139
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Baker S R, Alford E L. Mid-forehead flaps.  Oper Tech Otolaryngol. 1993;  4 24-30
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Gillies H D, Millard D R. The Principles and Art of Plastic Surgery. Boston; Little & Brown 1957
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 21 Burget G C, Menick F J. Nasal support and lining: the marriage of beauty and blood supply.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989;  84 189-202
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar

Anthony P SclafaniM.D. F.A.C.S. 

310 East 14th Street

6th Floor, North Building, The New York Eye & Ear Infirmary, New York, NY 10003