Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-965569
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York
Efficiency of Wheelchair Propulsion and Effects of Strategy
Publication History
accepted after revision June 11, 2007
Publication Date:
18 September 2007 (online)
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the contributions of arm frequency and propulsion mode on the internal work during submaximal wheelchair propulsion. Twelve able-bodied participants performed a V·O2 peak test on a wheelchair ergometer. On a separate occasion, six (4 min) submaximal exercise conditions employing two modes of propulsion (synchronous, SYN vs. asynchronous, ASY) at arm frequencies of 40 and 80 rev · min-1 were performed at 1.2 m · s-1 and 1.7 m · s-1. These conditions resulted in three push strategy combinations (ASY [20 : 20], SYN [40 : 40] & ASY [40 : 40]) at two speeds. Gross, net, work and delta efficiency were determined. The cost of unloaded exercise was significantly lower for the ASY [20 : 20] than both ASY and SYN [40 : 40] (0.49 vs. 0.58 and 0.57 L · min-1, respectively). All the efficiency indices decreased as velocity increased (p < 0.01). ASY [20 : 20] was the least efficient (gross and work) mode (4.2 ± 0.4 % and 6.2 ± 0.8 % respectively). Comparison of equal arm frequencies (ASY [40 : 40] vs. SYN [40 : 40]); found the efficiency to be lower for ASY propulsion (p < 0.05). Under the current testing conditions SYN propulsion mode offers greater efficiency during wheelchair propulsion.
Key words
gross efficiency - work efficiency - wheelchair exercise - synchronous - asynchronous
References
- 1 Brown D D, Knowlton R G, Hamill J, Schneider T L, Hetzler R K. Physiological and biomechanical differences between wheelchair-dependent and able-bodied subjects during wheelchair ergometry. Eur J Appl Physiol. 1990; 60 179-182
- 2 Dallmeijer A J, Zentgraaff I D, Zijp N I, van der Woude L HV. Sub-maximal physical strain and peak performance in handcycling versus hand-rim wheelchair propulsion. Spinal Cord. 2004; 42 91-98
- 3 Groot de S, Veeger D HEV, Hollander A P, van der Woude L HV. Wheelchair propulsion technique and mechanical efficiency after 3 wk of practice. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002; 34 756-766
- 4 Durnin J V, Womersley J. Body fat assessed from total body density and its estimation from skinfold thickness: measurements on 481 men and women aged from 16 to 72 years. Br J Nutr. 1974; 32 77-97
- 5 Gaesser G A, Brooks G A. Muscular efficiency during steady-rate exercise: effects of speed and work rate. J Appl Physiol. 1975; 38 1132-1139
- 6 Glaser R M, Sawka M N, Young R E, Suryaprasad A G. Applied physiology for wheelchair design. J Physiol. 1980; 48 41-44
- 7 Goosey V L, Campbell I G, Fowler N E. The relationship between three-dimensional wheelchair propulsion techniques and pushing economy. J Appl Biomech. 1998; 14 412-427
- 8 Goosey V L, Campbell I G, Fowler N E. Effect of push frequency on the economy of wheelchair racers. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000; 32 174-181
- 9 Goosey-Tolfrey V L, Kirk J H. Effect of push frequency and strategy variations on economy and perceived exertion during wheelchair propulsion. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2003; 90 153-158
- 10 Hintzy F, Tordi N. Mechanical efficiency during hand-rim wheelchair propulsion: effects of base-line subtraction and power output. Clin Biomech. 2004; 19 343-349
- 11 Hintzy F, Tordi N, Perrey S. Muscular efficiency during arm cranking and wheelchair exercise: a comparison. Int J Sports Med. 2002; 23 408-414
- 12 Marais G, Dupont L, Maillet M, Weisslans T, Vanvelcenaher J, Pelayo P. Cardiorespiratory and efficiency responses during arm and leg exercises with spontaneously chosen crank and pedal rates. Ergonomics. 2002; 45 631-639
- 13 Patterson P, Draper S. Selected comparisons between experienced and non-experienced individuals during manual wheelchair propulsion. Biomed Sci Instrum. 1997; 33 477-481
- 14 Peronnet F, Massicotte D. Table of non-protein respiratory quotient: an update. Can J Sport Sci. 1991; 16 23-29
- 15 Theisen D, Francaux M, Fayt A, Sturbois X. A new procedure to determine external power output during hand-rim wheelchair propulsion on a roller ergometer: a reliability study. Int J Sports Med. 1996; 17 564-571
- 16 van der Woude L HV, Bosmans I, Bervoets B, Veeger H EJ. Handcycling: different modes and gear ratios. J Med Eng Tech. 2000; 24 242-249
- 17 van der Woude L HV, Veeger H EJ, Dallmeijer A J, Janssen T WJ, Rozendaal L A. Biomechanics and physiology in active manual wheelchair propulsion. Med Eng Physics. 2001; 23 713-733
- 18 van der Woude L HV, Veeger H EJ, Rozendal R H, Sargeant A J. Optimum cycle frequencies in hand-rim wheelchair propulsion. Wheelchair propulsion technique. Eur J Appl Physiol. 1989; 58 625-632
- 19 Veeger H EJ, van der Woude L HV, Rozendal R H. Effect of hand-rim velocity on mechanical efficiency in wheelchair propulsion. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1992; 24 100-107
- 20 Verellen J, Theisen D, Vanlandewijck Y. Influence of crank rate in hand cycling. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004; 36 1826-1831
- 21 Whipp B J, Wasserman K. Efficiency of muscular work. J Appl Physiol. 1969; 26 644-648
Dr. PhD Victoria L. Goosey-Tolfrey
The Manchester Metropolitan University
Exercise and Sport Science
Cheshire
United Kingdom
Phone: + 44 0 15 09 22 63 02/3
Fax: + 44 0 15 09 22 63 01
Email: v.l.tolfrey@lboro.ac.uk