Dual-port distal pancreatectomy using a prototype endoscope and endoscopic stapler: a natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) survival study in a porcine model

Background and study aims: Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) is a potentially less invasive alternative to laparoscopic surgery that may be applicable to distal pancreatectomy. We aimed to demonstrate the technical feasibility of a NOTES distal pancreatectomy in an in vivo porcine model via a combined transvaginal-transcolonic approach.

Material and methods: The procedure was performed in five female Yorkshire pigs weighing approximately 30 kg each. A prototype endoscope (”R-scope”), advanced into the peritoneal cavity through an anterior colotomy, and a computer-assisted linear stapler, introduced transvaginally, were used in dissection and resection of the distal pancreas. Prone positioning was used to enhance retroperitoneal exposure. Pneumodissection was used for blunt dissection. The colotomies were closed with endoloops. Necropsies were done immediately after the procedure in the first three animals, and after 2 weeks’ survival in the final two animals.

Results: Distal pancreatectomy was successful in all five animals. Prone positioning was critically important for proper exposure of retroperitoneal and pelvic structures. Pneumodissection was effective for blunt dissection, and both the linear stapler and R-scope functioned smoothly. Transvaginal and transcolonic access provided similar intraperitoneal views, and the dual-lumen approach enhanced triangulation. Both survival animals thrived postoperatively. Necropsies revealed clean staple lines; closed transcolonic and transvaginal incisions; and absence of infection, hemorrhage, or fluid collections.

Conclusions: NOTES distal pancreatectomy is technically feasible in the porcine model. The transvaginal approach provides a vantage point very similar to that of the transcolonic route and holds promise as a NOTES access site, either singly or as part of a dual-lumen approach. The endoscopic linear stapler and R-scope both advance NOTES capabilities. The novel concepts of fully prone positioning, pneumodissection, and endoloop colotomy closures are introduced. Considering anatomical differences and that healthy animals were used, transferring this technique to patients with pancreatic disease might be difficult and further modifications would likely be needed.

References

• 1 Shimizu S, Tanaka M, Konomi H. et al . Laparoscopic pancreatic surgery: current indications and surgical results.  Surg Endosc. 2004;  18 402-406
• 2 Fernandez-Cruz L, Cesar-Borges G, Lopez-Boado M A. et al . Minimally invasive surgery of the pancreas in progress.  Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2005;  390 342-354
• 3 Tagaya N, Kasama K, Suzuki N. et al . Laparoscopic resection of the pancreas and review of the literature.  Surg Endosc. 2003;  17 201-206
• 4 Benoist S, Dugue L, Sauvanet A. et al . Is there a role of preservation of the spleen in distal pancreatectomy?.  J Am Coll Surg. 1999;  188 255-260
• 5 Lillemoe K D, Kaushal S, Cameron J L. et al . Distal pancreatectomy: indications and outcomes in 235 patients.  Ann Surg. 1999;  229 693-698
• 6 Verhoeven H C, Brosens I. Transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy, its history and present indication.  Minim Invasiv Ther Allied Technol. 2005;  14 175-180
• 7 Gordts S, Campo R, Brosens I. Experience with transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy for reconstructive tubo-ovarian surgery.  Reprod Biomed Online. 2002;  4 (Suppl 3) 72-75
• 8 Tsin D A. Culdolaparoscopy: a preliminary report.  JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoendscopic Surgeons. 2001;  5 69-71
• 9 Gordts S, Brosens I, Gordts S. et al . Progress in transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy.  Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am. 2004;  31 631-639
• 10 Darai E, Dessolle L, Lecruru F. et al . Transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy compared with laparoscopy for the evaluation of infertile women: a prospective comparative blind study.  Hum Reprod. 2000;  15 2379-282
• 11 Gordts S, Campo R, Rombauts L. et al . Transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy as an outpatient procedure for infertility investigation.  Hum Reprod. 1998;  13 99-103
• 12 Tsin D A, Colombero L T, Mahmood D. et al . Operative culdolaparoscopy: a new approach combining operative culdoscopy and minilaparoscopy.  J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2001;  8 438-441
• 13 Tsin D A, Sequeria R J, Giannikas G. Culdolaparoscopic cholecystectomy during vaginal hysterectomy.  JSLS. 2003;  7 171-172
• 14 Buess G, Kipfmuller K, Ibald R. et al . Clinical results of transanal endoscopic microsurgery.  Surg Endosc. 1988;  2 245-250
• 15 Tytgat G N. Dilation therapy of benign esophageal stenoses.  World J Surg. 1989;  13 142-148
• 16 Iglesias J J, Sporer A, Gellman A C. et al . New Iglesias resectoscope with continuous irrigation, simultaneous suction and low intravesical pressure.  J Urol. 1975;  114 929-933
• 17 Fong D G, Pai R D, Thompson C C. Transcolonic endoscopic abdominal exploration: a NOTES survival study in a porcine model.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  65 312-318
• 18 Pai R D, Fong D G, Bundga M E. et al . Transcolonic endoscopic cholecystectomy: a NOTES survival study in a porcine model [with video].  Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;  64 428-434
• 19 Gordts S, Campo R, Brosens I. Office transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy for early diagnosis of pelvic endometriosis and adhesions.  J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2000;  7 45-49
• 20 Gordts S, Campo R, Puttemans P. et al . Investigation of the infertile couple: a one-stop outpatient endoscopy-based approach.  Hum Reprod. 2002;  17 1684-1687
• 21 Sclabas G M, Swain P, Swanstrom L L. Endoluminal methods for gastrotomy closure in natural orifice transenteric surgery (NOTES).  Surg Innov. 2006;  13 23-30
• 22 Pearle M S, Nakada S Y, McDougall E M. et al . Laparoscopic pneumodissection: results in initial 20 patients.  J Am Coll Surg. 1997;  184 579-583
• 23 Gardner S M, Clayman R V, McDougall E M. et al . Laparoscopic pneumodissection: a unique means of tissue dissection.  J Urol. 1995;  154 (2 Pt 1) 591-594
• 24 Dawson D L, Coil J A, Jadali M. et al . Use of skin staplers in experimental gastrointestinal injuries.  J Trauma. 1992;  32 204-209
• 25 Edwards D P, Warren B F, Galbraith K A. et al . Comparison of two closure techniques for the repair of experimental colonic perforations.  Br J Surg. 1999;  86 514-517
• 26 Raju G S, Ahmed I, Brining D. et al . Endoluminal closure of large perforations of colon with clips in a porcine model [with video].  Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;  64 640-646
• 27 Wilhelm D, Meining A, von Delius S. et al . An innovative, safe and sterile sigmoid access (ISSA) for NOTES.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 401-406