References
-
1
Polkowski M.
Endoscopic ultrasonography.
Endoscopy.
2006;
38
16-21
-
2
Khalid A, Nodit L, Zahid M. et al .
Endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspirate DNA analysis to differentiate malignant and benign pancreatic masses.
Am J Gastroenterol.
2006;
101
2493-2500
-
3
Nodit L, McGrath K M, Zahid M. et al .
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspirate microsatellite loss analysis and pancreatic endocrine tumor outcome.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol.
2006;
4
1474-1478
-
4
Salek C, Benesova L, Zavoral M. et al .
Evaluation of clinical relevance of examining K-ras, p16 and p53 mutations along with allelic losses at 9p and 18q in EUS-guided fine needle aspiration samples of patients with chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer.
World J Gastroenterol.
2007;
13
3714-3720
-
5
Gomes A L, Bardales R H, Milanezi F. et al .
Molecular analysis of c-Kit and PDGFRA in GISTs diagnosed by EUS.
Am J Clin Pathol.
2007;
127
89-96
-
6
Khalid A, Pal R, Sasatomi E. et al .
Use of microsatellite marker loss of heterozygosity in accurate diagnosis of pancreaticobiliary malignancy from brush cytology samples.
Gut.
2004;
53
1860-1865
-
7
Khalid A, McGrath K M, Zahid M. et al .
The role of pancreatic cyst fluid molecular analysis in predicting cyst pathology.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol.
2005;
3
967-973
-
8
Aithal G P, Anagnostopoulos G K, Tam W. et al .
EUS-guided tissue sampling: comparison of ”dual sampling“ (Trucut biopsy plus FNA) with ”sequential sampling“ (Trucut biopsy and then FNA as required).
Endoscopy.
2007;
39
725-730
-
9
Storch I, Jorda M, Thurer R. et al .
Advantage of EUS Trucut biopsy combined with fine-needle aspiration without immediate on-site cytopathologic examination.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2006;
64
505-511
-
10
Varadarajulu S, Fraig M, Schmulewitz N. et al .
Comparison of EUS-guided 19-gauge Trucut needle biopsy with EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration.
Endoscopy.
2004;
36
397-401
-
11
Polkowski M, Gerke W, Nasierowska-Guttmejer A. et al .
Endosonography-guided trucut biopsy of hypoechoic submucosal tumors of the stomach [abstract].
Endoscopy.
2006;
38 (Suppl II)
A35
-
12
Verma D, Kapadia A, Eisen G M. et al .
EUS vs MRCP for detection of choledocholithiasis.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2006;
64
248-254
-
13
Garrow D, Miller S, Sinha D. et al .
Endoscopic ultrasound: a meta-analysis of test performance in suspected biliary obstruction.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol.
2007;
5
616-623
-
14
Romagnuolo J, Bardou M, Rahme E. et al .
Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: a meta-analysis of test performance in suspected biliary disease.
Ann Intern Med.
2003;
139
547-557
-
15
Pungpapong S, Wallace M B, Woodward T A. et al .
Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis: a prospective comparison study.
J Clin Gastroenterol.
2007;
41
88-93
-
16
Lam E C, Rego R R, Paquin S C. et al .
In patients referred for investigation because computed tomography suggests thickened gastric folds, endoscopic ultrasound is superfluous if gastroscopy is normal.
Am J Gastroenterol.
2007;
102
1200-1203
M. Polkowski, MD
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Medical Center for Postgraduate Education
M. Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology
Roentgena 5
02-781 Warsaw
Poland
Fax: +48-22-5463035
Email: m.polkowski@coi.waw.pl
