Int J Sports Med 2008; 29(9): 753-757
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-989441
Training & Testing

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Allometric Scaling of Uphill Cycling Performance

S. A. Jobson1 , J. Woodside2 , L. Passfield3 , A. M. Nevill4
  • 1Department of Sports Studies, University of Winchester, Winchester, United Kingdom
  • 2School of Applied Sciences, University of Glamorgan, Pontypridd, United Kingdom
  • 3Centre for Sports Studies, University of Kent, Chatham, United Kingdom
  • 4School of Sport, Performing Arts and Leisure, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, United Kingdom
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

accepted after revision November 27, 2007

Publikationsdatum:
22. Januar 2008 (online)

Preview

Abstract

Previous laboratory-based investigations have identified optimal body mass scaling exponents in the range 0.79 – 0.91 for uphill cycling. The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate whether or not these exponents are also valid in a field setting. A proportional allometric model was used to predict the optimal power-to-mass ratios associated with road-based uphill time-trial cycling performance. The optimal power function models predicting mean cycle speed during a 5.3 km, 5.4 % road hill-climb time-trial were (V˙O2max · m−1.24)0.55 and (RMPmax · m−1.04)0.54, explained variance being 84.6 % and 70.5 %, respectively. Slightly higher mass exponents were observed when the mass predictor was replaced with the combined mass of cyclist and equipment (mC). Uphill cycling speed was proportional to (V˙O2max · mC −1.33)0.57 and (RMPmax · mC −1.10)0.59. The curvilinear exponents, 0.54 – 0.59, identified a relatively strong curvilinear relationship between cycling speed and energy cost, suggesting that air resistance remains influential when cycling up a gradient of 5.4 %. These results provide some support for previously reported uphill cycling mass exponents derived in laboratories. However, the exponents reported here were a little higher than those reported previously, a finding possibly explained by a lack of geometric similarity in this sample.

References

Dr. Simon A. Jobson

University of Winchester
Department of Sports Studies

Sparkford Road

S022 4NR Winchester

United Kingdom

Fax: + 44 19 62 82 71 02

eMail: Simon.Jobson@winchester.ac.uk