Comparison of trot kinetics between dogs with stifle or hip arthrosis

E. Madore; L. Huneault; M. Moreau; J. Dupuis

doi:10.1160/VCOT-06-06-0052

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Table of Contents

Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2007; 20(02): 102-107
DOI: 10.1160/VCOT-06-06-0052

Original Research

Schattauer GmbH

Comparison of trot kinetics between dogs with stifle or hip arthrosis

E. Madore

¹The Companion Animal Research Group, Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Université de Montréal, St-Hyacinthe, Quebec, Canada

,

L. Huneault

¹The Companion Animal Research Group, Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Université de Montréal, St-Hyacinthe, Quebec, Canada

,

M. Moreau

¹The Companion Animal Research Group, Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Université de Montréal, St-Hyacinthe, Quebec, Canada

,

J. Dupuis

²DMV Veterinary Center, Lachine, Quebec, Canada

› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Summary

The purposes of this study were: 1) to describe and compare the trotting gait of normal and lame dogs secondary to stifle (GONOA) or hip (COXOA) osteoarthritis (OA) using multiple ground reaction forces (GRF) parameters, and 2) to pinpoint any characteristic in gait profile (‘signatures’) which could help to discriminate a lameness secondary to GONOA or COXOA. Fifty-one large breed dogs with OA (19 GONOA, 32 COXOA) and 22 normal dogs were included in the study. The vertical and cranio-caudal (braking-propelling) GRF were collected. The total stance time, and for each orthogonal vector, the peak force, impulse, time to peak, and the rate of limb loading were recorded. Vertical and craniocaudal forces were found to be significantly decreased in both OA groups compared to normal dogs. Vertical, cranial and caudal limb loading were also most often lower for both OA groups. In addition, the vertical and cranial forces were significantly lower in dogs with GONOA compared to COXOA and normal dogs. This study has demonstrated that, at a trotting gait, OA dogs secondary to GONOA and COXOA load their affected limb, brake and propel earlier during the stance phase, but generally with less magnitude than normal dogs. Dogs affected by GONOA also present more severe gait alterations than dogs with COXOA. The vertical and braking specific GRF alterations described may be kinetic ‘signatures’ linked more to lame dogs secondary to GONOA versus COXOA. Finally, this study has also provided useful baseline GRF data for further clinical and research investigations.

Keywords

Ground reaction forces - kinetic gait analysis - osteoarthritis - hip dysplasia - cranial cruciate ligament rupture

Full Text

References

References
1 Danks L, Sabokbar A, Gundle R. et al. Synovial macrophage-osteoclast differentiation in inflammatory arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2002; 61: 916-921.
2 Lahm A, Kreuz PC, Oberst M. et al. Subchondral and trabecular bone remodeling in canine experimental osteoarthritis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2005; 6: 1-6.
3 Lajeunesse D. Altered subchondral osteoblast cellular metabolism in osteoarthritis: cytokines, ei- cosanoids, and growth factors. J Musculoskel Neuron Interact 2002; 2: 504-506.
4 Laufer S. Role of eicosanoids in structural degradation in osteoarthritis. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2003; 15: 623-627.
5 Innes JF, Fuller CJ, Grover ER. et al. Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel group study of P54FP for the treatment of dogs with osteoarthritis. Vet Rec 2003; 152: 457-460.
6 Budsberg SC, Verstraete MC, Soutas-Little RB. et al. Force plate analyses before and after stabilization of canine stifle for cruciate injury. Am J Vet Res 1988; 49: 1522-1524.
7 DeCamp CE. Kinetic and kinematic gait analysis and the assessment of lameness in the dog. Vet Clin Small Anim Pract 1997; 27: 825-840.
8 DeCamp CE, Riggs CM, Olivier NB. et al. Kinematic evaluation of gait in dogs with cranial cruciate ligament rupture. Am J Vet Res 1996; 57: 120-126.
9 Dermott JJ, De Camp CE, Hauptman JG. et al. Use of force plate analysis of gait to compare two surgical techniques for treatment of cranial cruciate ligament rupture in dogs. Am JVet Res 1996; 57: 389-393.
10 Vasseur PB. Musculoskeletal system. In: Tex- book of small animal surgery. vol 2. Slatter D. (ed). Philadelphia: Saunders; 2002: 2009-2122.
11 Bennett RL, De Camp CE, Flo GL. et al. Kinematic gait analysis in dogs with hip dysplasia. Am JVet Res 1996; 57: 966-971.
12 Dobromylsky JP, Flecknell PA, Lascelles BD. et al. Pain assessment. In: Flecknell PA, Waterman- Pearson A, eds. Pain management in animals London: W.B. Saunders Co. 2000; 53-79.
13 Gordon WJ, Conzemius MG. RiedeselEetal. The relationship between limb function and radiographic osteoarthrosis in dogs with stifle osteoarthrosis. Vet Surg 2003; 32: 451-454.
14 Hielm-Bjorkman A, Kuusela E, Liman A. et al. Evaluation methods for assessment of pain associated with chronic osteoarthritis in dogs. JAmVet Med Assoc 2003; 222: 1552-1558.
15 Loeuille D, Chary-Valckenaere I, Champigneule J. et al. Macroscopic and microscopic features of synovial membrane inflammation in the osteoarthritic knee. Arthritis Rheum 2005; 52: 3492-3501.
16 Evans R, Horstman C, Conzemius M. Accuracy and optimization of force platform analysis in La- bradors with cranial cruciate disease evaluated at awalking gait. Vet Surg 2005; 34: 445-449.
17 Budsberg SC, Chambers JN, Van Lue SL. et al. Prospective evaluation of ground reaction forces in dogs undergoing unilateral total hip replacement. Am J Vet Res 1996; 57: 1781-1785.
18 McLaughlin RM, Miller CW, Taves CL. et al. Force plate analysis of triple pelvic osteotomy for the treatment of canine hip dysplasia. Vet Surg 1991; 20: 291-297.
19 Anderson MA. Force plate analysis: anon-invasive tool for gait evaluation. Comp Cont Ed Pract Vet 1994; 16: 857-867.
20 Jevens DJ, DeCamp CE, Hauptman J. et al. Use of force-plate analysis of gait to compare two surgical techniques for treatment of cranial cruciate ligament rupture in dogs. Am JVet Res 1996; 57: 389-393.
21 Kennedy S, Lee DV, Bertram JEA. et al. Gait evaluation in hip osteoarthritic and normal dogs using a serial force plate system. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2003; 16: 170-177.
22 Moreau M, Dupuis J, Bonneau NH. et al. Clinical evaluation of a nutraceutical, carprofen and mel- oxicam for the treatment of dogs with osteoarthritis. VetRec 2003; 152: 323-329.
23 Rumph PF, Kincaid SA, Visco DM. et al. Redistribution of vertical ground reaction forces in dogs with experimentally induced chronic hindlimb lameness. Vet Surg 1995; 24: 384-389.
24 Trumble TN, Billinghurst RC, McIlwraith CW. Correlation of prostanglandin E2 concentrations in synovial fluid with ground reaction forces and clinical variables for pain or inflammation in dogs with osteoarthritis induced by transaction of the cranial cruciate ligament. Am J Vet Res 2004; 65: 1269-1275.
25 Budsberg SC, Verstraete MC. Soutas-Little RB. Force plate analysis of the walking gait in healthy dogs. Am JVet Res 1987; 48: 915-919.
26 Renberg WC, Johnston SA, Ye K. et al. Comparison of stance time and velocity as control variables in force plate analysis in dogs. Am J Vet Res 1999; 60: 814-819.
27 Budsberg SC. Long-term temporal evaluation of ground reaction forces during development of experimentally induced osteoarthritis in dogs. Am J Vet Res 2001; 62: 1207-1211.
28 Trumble TN, Billinghurst RC, Bendele AM. et al. Evaluation of changes in vertical ground reaction forces as indicators of meniscal damage after transaction of the cranial cruciate ligament in dogs. Am JVet Res 2005; 66: 156-163.
29 Rumph PF, Lander JE, Kincaid SA. et al. Ground reaction force profiles from force platform gait analyses of clinically normal mesomorphic dogs at the trot. Am JVet Res 1994; 55: 756-761.
30 Van Klaveren NJ, Suwankong N, DeBoer S. et al. Force plate analysis before and after dorsal decompression for treatment of degenerative lumbosacral stenosis in dogs. Vet Surg 2005; 34: 450-456.
31 Budsberg SC, Rytz U, Johnston SA. Effects of acceleration on ground reaction forces collected in healthy dogs at a trot. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1999; 12: 15-19.
32 McLaughlin McLaughlin, Roush J. Effects of subject stance time and velocity on ground reaction forces in clinically normal greyhounds at the trot. Am J VetRes 1994; 55: 1666-1671.
33 Innes JF, Little CB, Hughes CE. et al. Products resulting from cleavage ofthe interglobular domain of aggrecan in samples of synovial fluid collected from the dogs with early- and late-stage osteoar- thritis. Am JVet Res 2005; 66: 1679-1685.
34 Shibakawa A, Yudoh K, Msaku-Hongo K. et al. The role of subchondral bone resorption pits in osteoarthritis: MMP production by cells derivated from bone marrow. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2005; 13: 679-687.
35 Benito MJ, Veale DJ, FitzGerald O. et al. Synovial tissue inflammation in early and late osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2005; 64: 1263-1267.
36 Poy NSJ, DeCamp CE, Bennett RL. et al. Additional kinematic variables to describe differences in the trot between clinically normal dogs and dogs with hip dysplasia. Am J Vet Res 2000; 61: 974-978.
37 Renberg WC, Johnston SA, Carrig CB. et al. Evaluation of a method for experimental induction of osteoarthritis of the hip joints in dogs. Am JVet Res 2000; 61: 484-491.