A mechanical evaluation of pre-tapped and self-tapped screws in small bones

Summary

The purpose of this study was to compare the holding powers of 2.7 mm pre-tapped and self-tapped screws placed closely together and tightened in small bones. Pairs of metatarsals were collected from healthy, skeletally mature Greyhounds and part of a 2.7 mm dynamic compression plate was fixed to the dorsal surface of each bone using three 2.7 mm screws. Identical screws were used throughout but only one of each pair of bones had threads pre-cut using a tap prior to insertion. All of the screws were tightened before the constructs were mounted in a materials testing machine and the centrally placed screw was loaded incrementally until failure. Load-deformation curves were plotted and yield point, ultimate load to failure, stiffness and energy prior to yield point were measured. Mean values were recorded for each parameter and Student's T-test was used to test the null hypothesis that there is no difference in holding power between pre-tapped and self-tapped screws. Significant mechanical differences were not found between pre-tapped and self-tapped screws placed closely together and tightened into small bones. Self-tapped screws can be considered for use in small animal surgery even when multiple screws are to be placed closely together in relatively small pieces of bone.

Keywords

Screws - pre-tapped - self-tapped

• References

• 1 Lambotte A. L'intervention operatoire dans les fracteurs, Lamartins, Brussels. 1907
• 2 Sherman WO. Vanadium steel bone plates and screws. Surg Gynec Obst 1912; 14: 629-634.
• 3 Danis R. Theorie et pratique de l'osteosynthese, Masson, Paris. 1949
• 4 Schatzker J. Screws and plates and their application. in Allgower M. (ed) Manual of Internal Fixation, Techniques Recommended by the AO-ASIF Group. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1991: 179-182.
• 5 Baumgart FW, Cordey J, Morikawa K. et al. AO/ ASIF self-tapping screws (STS). Injury 1993; 24: 1-17.
• 6 Andrea CR, Stover SM, Galuppo LD. et al. Comparison of insertion time and pullout strength between self-tapping and non-self-tapping AO 4.5mm cortical bone screws in adult equine third metacarpal bone. Vet Surg 2002; 31: 189-194.
• 7 Murphy TP, Hill CM, Kapatkin AS. et al. Pullout properties of 3.5mm AO/ASIF self-tapping and cortex screws in a uniform synthetic material and in canine bone. Vet Surg 2001; 30: 253-260.
• 8 Brunnberg L, Forterre F, Kaiser S. et al. Tibia and fibula fractures in the cat. Kleintierpraxis 2003; 48: 9-24.
• 9 Dyce J. The distal limb. in Coughlan AR, and Miller A. (ed) BSAVA Manual of Small Animal Fracture Repair and Management. (revised reprint) BSAVA Congress; Birmingham, UK: 2006: 267-275.
• 10 Hughes Hughes, Perren SM. Plate-bone friction in the compression fixation of fractures. Clin Orthop 1972; 89: 236-240.
• 11 MatWeb (Material Property Data). Available at http://www.matweb.com. Accessed November 29 2006
• 12 Ansell Ansell, Scales JT. A study of some factors which affect the strength of screws and their insertion and holding power in bone. J Biomechanics 1968; 1: 279-302.
• 13 Schatzker J, Sanderson R, Murnaghan JP. The holding power of orthopaedic screws in vivo. Clin Orthop 1975; 108: 115-126.
• 14 Bottcher P, Maier J. Mechanical comparisonof 4.5 mm narrow DCP plates of various manufactures. Proceedings of the 12th ESVOT Congress, Munich. 2004: 214.