Methods Inf Med 2010; 49(06): 581-591
DOI: 10.3414/ME09-01-0083
Original Articles
Schattauer GmbH

The Nested Structure of Cancer Symptoms

Implications for Analyzing Co-occurrence and Managing Symptoms
S. K. Bhavnani
1   Center for Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
2   Michigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
7   currenty at Institute for Translational Sciences, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
,
G. Bellala
3   Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
,
A. Ganesan
3   Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
,
R. Krishna
4   Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
,
P. Saxman
2   Michigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
,
C. Scott
1   Center for Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
3   Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
,
M. Silveira
5   Health Services Research and Development, VA Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
,
C. Given
6   Department of Family Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

received: 09 September 2009

accepted: 04 April 2010

Publication Date:
18 January 2018 (online)

Summary

Objective: Although many cancer patients experience multiple concurrent symptoms, most studies have either focused on the analysis of single symptoms, or have used methods such as factor analysis that make a priori assumptions about how the data is structured. This article addresses both limitations by first visually exploring the data to identify patterns in the co-occurrence of multiple symptoms, and then using those insights to select and develop quantitative measures to analyze and validate the results.

Methods: We used networks to visualize how 665 cancer patients reported 18 symptoms, and then quantitatively analyzed the observed patterns using degree of symptom overlap between patients, degree of symptom clustering using network modularity, clustering of symptoms based on agglomerative hierarchical clustering, and degree of nestedness of the symptoms based on the most frequently co-occurring symptoms for different sizes of symptom sets. These results were validated by assessing the statistical significance of the quantitative measures through comparison with random networks of the same size and distribution.

Results: The cancer symptoms tended to co-occur in a nested structure, where there was a small set of symptoms that co-occurred in many patients, and progressively larger sets of symptoms that co-occurred among a few patients.

Conclusions: These results suggest that cancer symptoms co-occur in a nested pattern as opposed to distinct clusters, thereby demonstrating the value of exploratory network analyses to reveal complex relationships between patients and symptoms. The research also extends methods for exploring symptom co-occurrence, including methods for quantifying the degree of symptom overlap and for examining nested co-occurrence in co-occur-rence data. Finally, the analysis also suggested implications for the design of systems that assist in symptom assessment and management. The main limitation of the study was that only one dataset was considered, and future studies should attempt to replicate the results in new data.

 
  • References

  • 1 Fan G, Filipczak L, Chow ES. Symptom Clusters in Cancer Patients: A Review of the Literature. Curr Oncol Rep 2007; 5 (14) 173-179.
  • 2 Dodd MJ, Miaskowski C, Paul SM. Symptom clusters and their effect on the functional status of patients with cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum 2001; 28 (Suppl. 03) 465-470.
  • 3 Given CW, Given B, Azzouz F, Kozachik S, Stommel M. Predictors of pain and fatigue in the year following diagnosis among elderly cancer patients. J Pain Symptom Manage 2001; 21 (Suppl. 06) 456-466.
  • 4 Glover J, Dibble SL, Dodd MJ, Miaskowski C. Mood states of oncology outpatients: does pain make a difference?. J Pain Symptom Manage 1995; 10 (Suppl. 02) 120-128.
  • 5 Miaskowski C. Gender differences in pain, fatigue, and depression in patients with cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2004; 32: 139-143.
  • 6 Miaskowski C, Kragness L, Dibble S, Wallhagen M. Differences in mood states, health status, and care-giver strain between family caregivers of oncology outpatients with and without cancer-related pain. J Pain Symptom Manage 1997; 13 (Suppl. 03) 138-147.
  • 7 Walsh D, Donnelly S, Rybicki L. The symptoms of advanced cancer: relationship to age, gender, and performance status in 1,000 patients. Support Care Cancer 2000; 8 (Suppl. 03) 175-179.
  • 8 Walsh D, Rybicki L. Symptom clustering in advanced cancer. Support Care Cancer 2006; 14 (Suppl. 08) 831-836.
  • 9 Barsevick AM, Whitmer K, Nail LM, Beck SL, Dudley WN. Symptom cluster research: conceptual, design, measurement, and analysis issues. J Pain Symptom Manage 2006; 31 (Suppl. 01) 85-95.
  • 10 Johnson RA, Wichern DW. Applied Mutlivariate Statistical Analysis. NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1998
  • 11 Glaus A, Boehme CH, Thurlimann B, Ruhstaller T, Schmitz SFH, Morant R. et al. Fatigue and menopausal symptoms in women with breast cancer undergoing hormonal cancer treatment. Ann Oncol 2006; 17: 801-806.
  • 12 Chen ML, Tseng HC. Symptom clusters in cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 2006; 14: 825-830.
  • 13 Dodd MJ, Miaskowski C, Paul SM. Symptom clusters and their effect on the functional status of patients with cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum 2001; 28: 465-470.
  • 14 Kim HJ, McGuire DB, Tulman L, Barsevick AM. Symptom clusters: concept analysis and clinical implications for cancer nursing. Cancer Nurs 2005; 28: 270-284.
  • 15 Barsevick AM, Whitmer K, Nail LM, Beck SL, Dudley WN. Symptom cluster research: conceptual, design, measurement, and analysis issues. J Pain Symptom Manage 2006; 31: 85-95.
  • 16 Ryan CJ, DeVon HA, Horne R, King KB, Milner K, Moser DK. et al. Symptom clusters in acute myocardial infarction: a secondary data analysis. Nurs Res 2007; 2 (56) 72-81.
  • 17 Giesecke T, Williams DA, Harris RE, Cupps TR, Tian X, Tian TX. et al. Subgrouping of fibromyalgia patients on the basis of pressure-pain thresholds and psychological factors. Arthritis Rheum 2003; 48 (10) 291-292.
  • 18 Walsh D, Rybicki L, Nelson KA, Donnelly S. Symptoms and prognosis in advanced cancer. Support Care Cancer 2002; 10: 385-388.
  • 19 Cleeland CS, Mendoza TR, Wang XS, Chou C, Harle MT, Morrissey M. et al. Accessing symptom distress in cancer patients: the M. D. Anderson Symptom Inventory. Cancer 2000; 89: 1634-1646.
  • 20 Gift AG, Jablonksi A, Stommel M, Given CW. Symptom clusters in elderly patients with lung cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum 2004; 31: 202-212.
  • 21 Kirkova J, Walsh D. Cancer Symptom Clusters – a dynamic construct. Support Care Cancer 2007
  • 22 Miaskowski C, Dodd M, Lee K. Symptom clusters: the new Frontier in symptom management research. JNCI Monographs 2004; 32: 17-21.
  • 23 Skerman H, Yatest P, Battistutta D. Multivariate methods to identify cancer-related symptom clusters. Res Nurs Health 2009; 3 (32) 345-360.
  • 24 Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J. The Elements of Statistical Learning. New York: Springer; 2001
  • 25 Sikorskii A, Given CW, Given B, Jeon S, Decker V, Decker D. et al. Symptom management for cancer patients: a trial comparing two multimodal interventions. J Pain Symptom Manage 2007; 3 (34) 253-264.
  • 26 Newman M. The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Review 2003; 2 (45) 167-256.
  • 27 Christakis NA, James HF. The Spread of Obesity in a Large Social Network Over 32 Years. N Engl J Med 2007; 4 (357) 370-379.
  • 28 Adamic LA, Bhavnani SK, Xiaolin S. Scatter Networks: A New Approach for Analyzing Information Scatter on the Web. New Journal of Physics (Special Issue on Complex Systems) 2007; 9: 231.
  • 29 Steuer R, Zamora-Lopez G. Analysis of Biological Networks. In: Junker BH, Schreiber F. editors. Global Properties of Networks. New York: Wiley-Inter-science; 2008
  • 30 Fruchterman T, Reingold E. Graph drawing by force-directed placement. Software: Practice and Experience 1991; 21: 1129-1164.
  • 31 Batagelj V, Mrvar A. Pajek – analysis and visualization of large networks. Graph Drawing Software 2003
  • 32 Guimera R, Sales-Pardo M, Amaral LAN. Module identification in bipartite and directed networks. Phys Rev E 2007: 76
  • 33 Tan P-N, Steinbach M, Kumar V. Introduction to Data Mining. 1st ed. New York: Addison Wesley; 2005
  • 34 Bruera E, Kuehn N, Miller MJ, Selmser P, Macmillan K. The Edmonton symptom assessment system. J Palliat Care 1991; 7: 6-9.
  • 35 Haes JD, Knippenberg Fv, Neijt J. Measuring psychology and physical distress in cancer patients. The Rotterdam symptom checklist. Br J Cancer 1990; 62: 1034-1038.
  • 36 Portenoy RK, Thaler HT, Kornblith AR, Lepore JM, Friedlander-Klar H, Kiyasu E. et al. The Memorial symptom assessment scale. Eur J Cancer 1994; 30: 1326-1336.
  • 37 Piette JD. Interactive voice response systems in the diagnosis and management of chronic disease. Am J Manag Care 2000; 6 (Suppl. 07) 817-827.
  • 38 Piette JD. Enhancing support via interactive technologies. Curr Diab Rep 2002; 2 (Suppl. 02) 160-165.