The biomechanical properties of the feline femur

Summary

The purpose of this study was to determine the biomechanical properties of feline long bone by testing cadaver bone from mature cats in compression, threepoint bending, notch sensitivity and screw pull-out strength. The determination of these properties is of clinical relevance with regard to the forces resulting in long bone fractures in cats as well as the behaviour and failure mode of surgical implants utilized for fracture stabilization and repair in the cat. Cadaveric cat femurs were tested in compression, three-point bending and in three-point bending after the addition of a 2.0 mm screw hole. Cortical screws, 2.7 mm in diameter, were inserted in cadaveric cat femur samples for screw pullout testing. The mean maximum load to failure of mid diaphyseal feline femurs tested in compression was 4201 ± 1218 N. Statistical analysis of the parameter of maximum load tested in compression revealed a statistical difference between sides (p=0.02), but not location (p=0.07), or location by side (p=0.12). The maximum strength of mid diaphyseal feline femurs tested in compression was 110.6 ± 26.6 MPa. The modulus of elasticity of mid-diaphyseal cat femurs tested in compression was determined to be 5.004 ± 0.970 GPa. The mean maximum load to failure of feline femurs tested in three-point bending was 443 ± 98 N. The mean maximum load to failure of feline femurs tested in three-point bending after a 2.0 mm diameter hole was drilled in the mid-diaphyseal region of each sample through both cortices was 471 ± 52 N. The mean maximum load required for screw pull-out of 2.7 mm cortical screws placed in feline femurs tested in tension was 886 ± 221 N. This data should be suitable for investigating fracture biomechanics and the testing of orthopaedic constructs commonly used for fracture stabilization in the feline patient.

Keywords

Cat femur - compression - elasticity - biomechanical properties - three-point bending

• References

• 1 An YH. Mechanical properties of bone.. In: Mechanical Testing of Bone and the Bone-Implant Interface. An YA, Draugn RA (eds). London: CRC Press; 2000: 41-63.
• 2 Ayers RA, Miller MR, Simske SJ. et al. Correlation of flexural structural properties with bone physical properties: a four species survey. Biomed Sci Instrum 1996; 32: 251-260.
• 3 Gentry SJ, Taylor RA, Dee JF. The use of veterinary cuttable plates: 21 cases.. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1993; 29: 455-459.
• 4 An YH, Draughn RA. Mechanical properties and testing methods of bone, In: Animal Models in Orthopedic Research.. An YH, Friedman R J (eds). London: CRC Press; 1999: 139-164.
• 5 Reilly DT, Burstein AH, Frankel VH. The elastic modulus for bone.. J Biomech 1974; 7: 271-278.
• 6 Brooks DB, Burstein AH, Frankel VH. The biomechanics of torsional fractures. The stress concentration effect of a drill hole.. J Bone Joint Surg 1970; 52-A: 507-514.
• 7 Reminger AR, Miclau T, Lindsey RW. The torsional strength of bones with residual screw holes from plates with unicortical and bicortical purchase.. Clin Biomech 1997; 12 (01) 71-73.
• 8 Burstein AH, Currey J, Frankel VH. et al. Bone strength: The effect of screw holes.. J Bone Joint Surg 1972; 54-A: 1143-1156.
• 9 Schatzker J, Houlton JEF. Concepts of fracture stabilization. In: Bone in clinical orthopedics. Sumner Smith G (ed). Stuttgart: AO Publishing; 2002: 327-346.
• 10 Flahiff CN, Gober GA, Nicholas RW. Pull-out strength of fixation screws from polymethylmethacrylate bone cement.. Biomaterials 1995; 16: 533-540.
• 11 Roe SC, Pijanowski GJ, Johnson AL. Biomechanical properties of canine cortical bone allografts - effects of preparation and storage.. Am J of Vet Research 1988; 49: 873-882.
• 12 Seebeck J, Goldhan J, Städele H. et al. Effect of cortical thickness and cancellous bone density on the holding strength of internal fixator screws.. J Orthop Res 2004; 22: 1237-1242.