Download PDF
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2010; 23(03): 190-195
DOI: 10.3415/VCOT-09-07-0080
Case Report
Schattauer GmbH

A case of stifle osteochondrosis treated by osteochondral autogenous grafting

One month morphological follow-up
S. Palierne
1   Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire, Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Surgery, University of Toulouse, Toulouse, France
,
A. Bilmont
1   Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire, Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Surgery, University of Toulouse, Toulouse, France
,
I. Raymond-Letron
1   Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire, Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Surgery, University of Toulouse, Toulouse, France
,
A. Autefage
1   Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire, Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Surgery, University of Toulouse, Toulouse, France
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received:20 July 2009

Accepted:05 February 2010

Publication Date:
18 December 2017 (online)

Also available at
  PDF Download  Permissions and Reprints

Summary

Objective: To describe the one-month morphological appearance of autogenous osteochondral grafting in a dog with stifle osteochondrosis.

Method: Osteochondral autografting was performed in one stifle of an eight-month-old dog with spontaneously occurring bilateral osteochondrosis.

Result: Histopathological analysis performed one month after surgery confirmed partial integration of the grafts and osteochondral survival.

Clinical significance: Autogenous osteochondral grafting in stifle osteochondrosis results in acceptable graft survival postoperatively and is worthy of further evaluation.

Keywords

Osteochondrosis - stifle - autogenous osteochondral grafting
 

  • References

  • 1 Ekman S, Carlson CS. The pathophysiology of osteochondrosis. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1998; 28: 17-32.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Harari J. Osteochondrosis of the femur. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1998; Jan 28: 87-94.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Ytrehus B, Carlson CS, Ekman S. Etiology and pathogenesis of osteochondrosis Vet Pathol. 2007; 44: 429-448.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Bertrand SG, Lewis DD, Madison JB. et al. Arthroscopic examination and treatment of osteochondritis dissecans of the femoral condyle of six dogs. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1997; 33: 451-455.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Wright RW, McLean M, Matava MJ. et al. Osteochondritis dissecans of the knee: long-term results of excision of the fragment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; 239-243.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Cook JL, Hudson CC, Kuroki K. Autogenous osteochondral grafting for treatment of stifle osteochondrosis in dogs. Vet Surg 2008; 37: 311-321.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Hangody L, Vasarhelyi G, Hangody LR. et al. Auto-logous osteochondral grafting-technique and long-term results. Injury 2008; 39 (Suppl. 01) S32-39.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Marcacci M, Kon E, Zaffagnini S. et al. Multiple osteochondral arthroscopic grafting (mosaicplasty) for cartilage defects of the knee: prospective study results at 2–year follow-up. Arthroscopy 2005; 21: 462-470.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Bodo G, Hangody L, Modis L. et al. Autologous osteochondral grafting (mosaic arthroplasty) for treatment of subchondral cystic lesions in the equine stifle and fetlock joints. Vet Surg 2004; 33: 588-596.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Lane JG, Massie JB, Ball ST. et al. Follow-up of osteochondral plug transfers in a goat model: a 6–month study. Am J Sports Med 2004; 32: 1440-1450.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Huang FS, Simonian PT, Norman AG. et al. Effects of small incongruities in a sheep model of osteochondral autografting. Am J Sports Med 2004; 32: 1842-1848.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Kordas G, Szabo J, Hangody L. Primary stability of osteochondral grafts used in mosaicplasty. Arthroscopy 2006; 22: 414-421.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Patil S, Butcher W, D'Lima DD. et al. Effect of osteochondral graft insertion forces on chondrocyte viability. Am J Sports Med 2008; 36: 1726-1732.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Hangody L, Miniaci A, Kish G. Osteochondral grafting using the Smith & Nephew MOSAIC-PLASTY™ System [document on internet]. Smith & Nephew Inc.; Endoscopy Division; 2001 [cited 2008 September 4] Available from: http://global.smith-nephew.com/cps/rde/xbcr/smith-nephewls/1030208.pdf.
    PubMed
  • 15 Hangody L, Kish G, Karpati Z. Autogenous osteochondral graft techniques for replacing knee cartilage defects in dogs. Ortho pint 1997; 7: 175-181.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Feczko P, Hangody L, Varga J. et al. Experimental results of donor site filling for autologous osteochondral mosaicplasty. Arthroscopy 2003; 19: 755-761.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Bottcher P, Zeissler M, Maierl J. et al. Mapping of split-line pattern and cartilage thickness of selected donor and recipient sites for autologous osteochondral transplantation in the canine stifle joint. Vet Surg 2009; 38: 696-704.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Li G, Park SE, DeFrate LE. et al. The cartilage thickness distribution in the tibiofemoral joint and its correlation with cartilage-to-cartilage contact. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2005; 20: 736-744.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Fitzpatrick N, Yeadon R, Smith TJ. Early clinical experience with osteochondral autograft transfer for treatment of osteochondritis dissecans of the medial humeral condyle in dogs. Vet Surg 2009; 38: 246-260.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar