Correction of craniodorsal coxofemoral luxation in cats and small breed dogs using a modified Knowles technique with the braided polyblend TightRope™ systems

K. Ash; D. Rosselli; A. Danielski; M. Farrell; M. Hamilton; N. Fitzpatrick

doi:10.3415/VCOT-11-02-0019

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Table of Contents

Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2012; 25(01): 54-60
DOI: 10.3415/VCOT-11-02-0019

Clinical Communication

Schattauer GmbH

Correction of craniodorsal coxofemoral luxation in cats and small breed dogs using a modified Knowles technique with the braided polyblend TightRope^™ systems

K. Ash

¹Fitzpatrick Referrals, Halfway Lane, Eashing, Godalming, Surrey, UK

,

D. Rosselli

¹Fitzpatrick Referrals, Halfway Lane, Eashing, Godalming, Surrey, UK

,

A. Danielski

¹Fitzpatrick Referrals, Halfway Lane, Eashing, Godalming, Surrey, UK

,

M. Farrell

¹Fitzpatrick Referrals, Halfway Lane, Eashing, Godalming, Surrey, UK

,

M. Hamilton

¹Fitzpatrick Referrals, Halfway Lane, Eashing, Godalming, Surrey, UK

,

N. Fitzpatrick

¹Fitzpatrick Referrals, Halfway Lane, Eashing, Godalming, Surrey, UK

› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Summary

Objectives: To report the surgical technique and short-term radiographic and functional outcome data for a series of client owned, small breed dogs and cats treated for traumatic craniodorsal coxofemoral luxation using open reduction and internal fixation with the Arthrex Mini TightRope (mTR) and TightRope (TR) systems.

Methods: Data were collected retrospectively from the clinical case records, including the initial clinical and radiographic findings, surgical technique, and postoperative short-term clinical and radiographic data. Functional data collected after the six weeks reassessment were obtained via owner questionnaire.

Results: Four cats (mTR = 4) and five small breed dogs (mean weight 15 kg; TR = 4, mTR = 1) were included. Median time to postoperative weight bearing was one day. Median lameness score at six weeks postoperatively was 0 out of 5. Coxofemoral joint congruity was radiographically confirmed at the six weeks postoperative visit. Telephone follow-up (at a median of 16 weeks) revealed all animals had returned to their previous level of activity. Complications were minor, and limited to postoperative swelling (n = 1).

Clinical significance: Clinical use of the Arthrex Mini TightRope™ and TightRope™ systems can be recommended for traumatic craniodorsal coxofemoral luxation in this novel application as short-term results are at least comparable to existing surgical techniques. Long-term follow-up studies are needed.

Keywords

Coxofemoral - luxation - TightRope - hip

Full Text

References

References
1 Duff SR, Bennett D. Hip luxation in small animals: an evaluation of some methods of treatment. Vet Rec 1982; 111: 140-143.
2 Fry PD. Observations on the surgical treatment of hip dislocation in the dog and cat. J Small Anim Pract 1974; 15: 661-670.
3 Basher WP, Walter MC, Newton CD. Coxofemoral luxation in the dog and cat. Vet Surg 1986; 15: 365-362.
4 Bone DL, Walker M, Cantwell HD. Traumatic coxofemoral luxations in dogs — results of repair. Vet Surg 1984; 13: 263-270.
5 Johnson ME, Braden TD. A retrospective study of prosthetic capsule technique for the treatment of problem cases of dislocated hips. Vet Surg 1987; 16: 346-351.
6 Meij BP, Hazewinkel HAW, Nap RC. Results of extra-articular stabilisation following open reduction of coxofemoral luxation in dogs and cats. J Small Anim Pract 1992; 33: 320-326.
7 Cetinkaya MA, Olcay B. Modified Knowles toggle pin technique with nylon monofilament suture material for treatment of two caudoventral hip luxation cases. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2010; 23: 114-118.
8 Martini FM, Simonazzi B, Del Bue M. Extra-articular absorbable suture stabilization of coxofemoral luxation in dogs. Vet Surg 2001; 30: 468-475.
9 Sissener TR, Whitelock RG, Langley-Hobbs SJ. Long-term results of transarticular pinning for surgical stabilisation of coxofemoral luxation in 20 cats. J Small Anim Pract 2009; 50: 112-117.
10 Trostel CD, Peck JN, deHaan JJ. Spontaneous bilateral coxofemoral luxation in four dogs. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2000; 36: 268-276.
11 Pozzi A, Kowaleski MP, Dyce J. et al. Treatment of traumatic coxo-femoral luxation by cemented total hp arthroplasty. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2004; 17: 198-203.
12 McLaughlin Jr RM, Tillson DM. Flexible external fixation for craniodorsal coxofemoral luxations in dogs. Vet Surg 1994; 23: 21-30.
13 Bjerring Mehl N. A new method of surgical treatment of hip dislocation in dogs and cats. J Small Anim Pract 1988; 29: 789-795.
14 Shani J, Johnston DE, Shahar R. Stabilization of traumatic coxofemoral luxation with an extra-capsular suture from the greater trochanter to the origin of the rectus femoris. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2004; 17: 12-16.
15 Venturini A, Pinna S, Tamburro R. Combined intra-extra-articular technique for stabilisation of coxofemoral luxation. Preliminary results in two dogs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2010; 23: 182-185.
16 Hammer DL. Recurrent coxofemoral luxation in fifteen dogs and one cat. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1980; 177: 1018-1020.
17 Douglas IH. Modified De Vita pinning technique for the management of canine hip luxation: preliminary findings. Aust Vet J 2000; 78: 538-542.
18 Bennett D, Duff SR. Transarticular pinning as a treatment for hip luxation in the dog and cat. J Small Anim Pract 1980; 21: 373-379.
19 Rochereau P, Bernarde A. Stabilization of coxo-fe-moral luxation using tenodesis of the deep gluteal muscle: technique description and short-term reluxation rate in 65 dogs and cats (1995–2008). Proceedings of the European College of Veterinary Surgeons congress 2010. July 1-3 Finland: Helsinki; E7
20 Lubbe AM, Verstraete FJM. Fascia lata loop stabilization of the coxofemoral joint in the dog and cat. J Small Anim Prac 1990; 31: 234-238.
21 Kiliç E, Ozaydin I, Atalan G. et al. Transposition of the sacrotuberous ligament for the treatment of coxofemoral luxation in dogs. J Small Anim Pract 2002; 43: 341-344.
22 Ozaydin I, Kiliç E, Baran V. et al. Reduction and stabilization of hip luxation by the transposition of the ligamentum sacrotuberale in dogs: an in vivo study. Vet Surg 2003; 32: 46-51.
23 Hunt CA, Henry Jr WB. Transarticular pinning for repair of hip dislocation in the dog: a retrospective study of 40 cases. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1985; 187: 828-833.
24 Demko JL, Sidaway BK, Thieman KM. et al. Toggle rod stabilization for treatment of hip joint luxation in dogs: 62 cases (2000–2005). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2006; 229: 984-989.
25 Flynn MF, Edmiston DN, Roe SC. et al. Biomechanical evaluation of a toggle pin technique for management of coxofemoral luxation. Vet Surg 1994; 23: 311-321.
26 Baltzer WI, Schulz KS, Stover SM. et al. Biomechanical analysis of suture anchors and suture materials used for toggle pin stabilization of hip joint luxation in dogs. Am J Vet Res 2001; 62: 721-728.
27 Beckham Jr HP, Smith MM, Kern DA. Use of a modified toggle pin for repair of coxofemoral luxation in dogs with multiple orthopedic injuries: 14 cases (1986–1994). J Am Vet Med Assoc 1996; 208: 81-84.
28 Hõim R, Andrianov V, Lenzner A. Use of the modified toggle pin technique for management of coxofemoral luxation in dogs: a review of literature and a report of two cases. Agraarteadus: journal of agricultural science: Akadeemilise Põllumajanduse Seltsi väljaanne 2003; 4: 203-208.
29 Knowles AT, Knowles JO, Knowles RP. An operation to preserve the continuity of the hip joint. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1953; 123: 508-515.
30 Lawson DD. Toggle fixation for recurrent dislocation of the hip in the dog. J Small Anim Pract 1965; 6: 57-59.
31 Denny HR, Minter HM. Recurrent coxofemoral luxation in the dog. Vet Annu 1973; 14: 220-225.
32 Piermattei DL, Johnson KA. Section IV, The Pelvis and Hip Joint. In: An Atlas of Surgical Approaches to the Bones and Joints of the Dog and Cat. 4th edition.. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: W.B. Saunders Company; 2004: 290-295.
33 Matis U. Traumatic hip luxation in cats. In: Proceedings of the 3rd . World Orthopedic Congress 2010. September 14–18 Bologna; Spain.: 143-144.
34 Brin YS, Nyska M, Kish B. Lisfranc injury repair with the TightRope device: a short-term case series. Foot Ankle Int 2010; 31: 624-627.
35 Cottom JM, Hyer CF, Philbin TM. et al. Treatment of syndesmotic disruptions with the Arthrex Tight-rope: a report of 25 cases. Foot Ankle Int 2008; 29: 773-780.
36 Walz L, Salzmann GM, Fabbro T. et al. The anatomic reconstruction of acromioclavicular joint dislocations using 2 TightRope devices: a biomechanical study. Am J Sports Med 2008; 36: 2398-4206.
37 Zooker CC, Parks BG, White KL. et al. TightRope versus fiber mesh tape augmentation of acromioclavicular joint reconstruction: a biomechanical study. Am J Sports Med 2010; 38: 1204-1208.
38 Cook JL, Luther JK, Beetem J. et al. Clinical comparison of a novel extracapsular stabilization procedure and tibial plateau leveling osteotomy for treatment of cranial cruciate ligament deficiency in dogs. Vet Surg 2010; 39: 315-323.
39 Tonks CA, Pozzi A, Ling HY. et al. The effects of extra-articular suture tension on contact mechanics of the lateral compartment of cadaveric stifles treated with the TightRope CCL or lateral suture technique. Vet Surg 2010; 39: 343-349.
40 Spranklin D, Elder S, Boyle C. et al. Comparison of a suture anchor and a toggle rod for use in toggle pin fixation of coxofemoral luxations. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2006; 42: 121-126.
41 Burgess R, Elder S, McLaughlin R. et al. In vitro bio-mechanical evaluation and comparison of Fiber-Wire, FiberTape, OrthoFiber, and nylon leader line for potential use during extraarticular stabilization of canine cruciate deficient stifles. Vet Surg 2010; 39: 208-215.
42 Wüst DM, Meyer DC, Favre P. et al. Mechanical and handling properties of braided polyblend polyethylene sutures in comparison to braided polyester and monofilament polydioxanone sutures. Arthroscopy 2006; 22: 1146-1153.
43 Lo IK, Ochoa Jr E., Burkhart SS. A comparison of knot security and loop security in arthroscopic knots tied with newer high-strength suture materials. Arthroscopy 2010; 26 (Suppl. 09) S120-126.
44 Scherman P, Haddad R, Scougall P. et al. Cross-sectional area and strength differences of fiberwire, prolene, and ticron sutures. J Hand Surg Am 2010; 35: 780-784.
45 Türker M, Kiliçoglu O, Salduz A. et al. Loop security and tensile properties of polyblend and traditional suture materials. Knee Surg Sports Trauma-tol Arthrosc 2011; 19: 296-302.
46 Edgerton BC, An K-N, Morrey BF. Torsional strength reduction due to cortical defects in bone. J Orth Res 1990; 8: 851-855.
47 Norris JB, Smith RT, White KL. et al. Effect of suture size and type on bone cutout in transosseous tendon repairs. Arthroscopy: J Arth Rel Surg 2010; 26: 324-327.
48 Varma S, Johnson LW, Ferguson HL. et al. Tissue reaction to suture materials in infected surgical wounds - a histopathologic evaluation. Am J Vet Res 1981; 42: 563-570.
49 Carr BJ, Ochoa L, Rankin D. et al. Biologic response to orthopedic sutures: a histologic study in a rabbit model. Orthopaedics 2009; 32: 828

Supplementary Material