Download PDF
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2013; 26(06): 493-497
DOI: 10.3415/VCOT-12-06-0070
Clinical Communication
Schattauer GmbH

Management of cranial cruciate ligament rupture in small dogs: A questionnaire study

E. Comerford
1   Institute of Ageing and Chronic disease and School of Veterinary Science, Leahurst Campus, University of Liverpool, Neston, Wirral, UK
,
K. Forster
2   Small Animal Teaching Hospital, School of Veterinary Science, Leahurst Campus, University of Liverpool, Neston, Wirral, UK
,
K. Gorton
2   Small Animal Teaching Hospital, School of Veterinary Science, Leahurst Campus, University of Liverpool, Neston, Wirral, UK
,
T. Maddox
2   Small Animal Teaching Hospital, School of Veterinary Science, Leahurst Campus, University of Liverpool, Neston, Wirral, UK
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 03 June 2012

Accepted: 19 June 2013

Publication Date:
04 January 2018 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Summary

Objectives: To survey the current management of cranial cruciate ligament rupture in small dogs (<15 kg) by veterinarians.

Methods: A questionnaire was distributed to veterinarians attending the British Veterinary Orthopaedic Association Spring meeting and British Small Animal Veterinary Association Annual Congress which took place in April 2010. Respondents were surveyed on their management of small dogs with cranial cruciate ligament rupture

Results: Immediate surgical management was chosen by 15.5% of the respondents. Following that, 77.6% of respondents suggested that case management would depend on severity of lameness (81%), age (72.6%), bodyweight (70.4%), degree of instability (64.8%), and duration of lameness (64.0%). Conservative management included non- steroidal antiinflammatory drugs (91.1%), short leash walks (91.1%), weight loss (89.0%), hydrotherapy (53.6%), physiotherapy (41.9%), and cage rest (24.2%). Where surgical management was chosen, 71.4% would perform the procedure rather than refer it to another practice. Surgical techniques included extra-capsular stabilisation (63.4%), corrective osteotomies (32.9%), and intra-articular stabilisation (6.8%). The demographic characteristics of the responding veterinarians had no effect on their initial management of the case. General practice veterinarians were less likely to perform a corrective osteotomy than to refer the case, but were no less likely to perform an extracapsular technique.

Clinical significance: Conservative management is still widely used for treatment of cranial cruciate ligament rupture in dogs weighing less than 15 kg; this is in agreement with previous publications on the management of this condition in small dogs.

Keywords

Cranial cruciate ligament - conservative - management - dogs

 

  • References

  • 1 Vasseur PB. Clinical results following nonoperative management for rupture of the cranial cruciate ligament in dogs. Vet Surg 1984; 13: 243-246.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Barnes AJ. Rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament of the dog: a survey from practices in the Kent region BSAVA. J Small Anim Pract 1977; 18: 55-59.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Pond MJ, Campbell JR. The canine stifle joint. I. Rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament. An assessment of conservative and surgical treatment. J Small Anim Pract 1972; 13: 1-10.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Arnoczky SP, Tarvin GB, Marshall JL. et al. Over-the-top procedure: Technique for anterior cruciate ligament substitution in the dog. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1979; 15: 283-290.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Stead AC, Amis AA, Campbell JR. Use of polyester fiber as a prosthetic cranial cruciate ligament in small animals. J Small Anim Pract 1991; 32: 448-454.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Childers HE. New method for cruciate ligament repair: II. Repair by suture technique. Mod Vet Pract 1966; 47: 59-60.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Flo GI. Modification of the lateral retinacular imbrication technique for stabilizing cruciate ligament injuries. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1975; 11: 570-573.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Edwards MR, Taylor RA, Franceschi RA. Clinical case applications of Mitek tissue anchors in veterinary orthopedics. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1993; 6: 208-212.
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Cook JL, Luther JK, Beetem J. et al. Clinical comparison of a novel extracapsular stabilization procedure and tibial plateau leveling osteotomy for treatment of cranial cruciate ligament deficiency in dogs. Vet Surg 2010; 39: 315-323.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Macias C, McKee WM, May C. Caudal proximal tibial deformity and cranial cruciate ligament rupture in small-breed dogs. J Small Anim Pract 2002; 43: 433-438.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Pacchiana PD, Morris E, Gillings SL. et al. Surgical and postoperative complications associated with tibial plateau leveling osteotomy in dogs with cranial cruciate ligament rupture: 397 cases (1998-2001). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2003; 222: 184-193.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Hoffmann DE, Miller JM, Ober CP. et al. Tibial tuberosity advancement in 65 canine stifles. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2006; 19: 219-227.
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Woodward CA. Guide to questionnaire construction and question writing. Canada: Canadian Public Health Association; 1986
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 14 Conzemius MG, Waxman AS, Robinson DA. et al. Relationship between objective and subjective assessment of limb function in normal dogs with an experimentally induced lameness. Vet Surg 2008; 37: 241-246.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Lu Y, Quinn MM, Keuler NS. et al. Evaluation of agreement between numerical rating scales, visual analogue scoring scales, and force plate gait analysis in dogs. Vet Surg 2007; 36: 360-367.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Moreau M, Dupuis J, Bonneau NH. et al. Clinical evaluation of a nutraceutical, carprofen and meloxicam for the treatment of dogs with osteoarthritis. Vet Rec 2003; 152: 323-329.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Giraudel JM, Peyrou M, King JN. et al. Population pharmacokinetic analysis of blood robenacoxib data from two dose confirmation field studies in dogs with osteoarthritis. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 2009; 32: 102-103.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Hanson PD, Brooks KC, Case J. et al. Efficacy and safety of firocoxib in the management of canine osteoarthritis under field conditions. Vet Ther 2006; 7: 127-140.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Malonne H, Coffiner M, Sonet B. et al. Efficacy and tolerability of sustained-release tramadol in the treatment of symptomatic osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Clin Ther 2004; 26: 1774-1782.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Bui LM, Bierer TL. Influence of green lipped mussels (Perna canaliculus) in alleviating signs of arthritis in dogs. Vet Ther 2003; 4: 397-407.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 de Haan JJ, Goring RL, Beale BS. Evaluation of polysulfated glycosaminoglycan for the treatment of hip dysplasia in dogs. Vet Surg 1994; 23: 177-181.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Innes JF. Outcomes-based medicine in veterinary surgery: levels of evidence. Vet Surg 2007; 36: 610-612.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Brandt KD, Smith GN, Myers SL. Hyaluronan injection affects neither osteoarthritis progression nor loading of the OA knee in dogs. Biorheology 2004; 41: 493-502.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Aragon CL, Hofmeister EH, Budsberg SC. Systematic review of clinical trials of treatments for osteoarthritis in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2007; 230: 514-521.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Impellizeri JA, Tetrick MA, Muir P. Effect of weight reduction on clinical signs of lameness in dogs with hip osteoarthritis. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2000; 216: 1089-1091.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Marsolais GS, McLean S, Derrick T. et al. Kinematic analysis of the hind limb during swimming and walking in healthy dogs and dogs with surgically corrected cranial cruciate ligament rupture. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2003; 222: 739-743.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Marsolais GS, Dvorak G, Conzemius MG. Effects of postoperative rehabilitation on limb function after cranial cruciate ligament repair in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2002; 220: 1325-1330.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Monk ML, Preston CA, McGowan CM. Effects of early intensive postoperative physiotherapy on limb function after tibial plateau leveling osteotomy in dogs with deficiency of the cranial cruciate ligament. Am J Vet Res 2006; 67: 529-536.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Au KK, Gordon-Evans WJ, Dunning D. et al. Comparison of short- and long-term function and radiographic osteoarthrosis in dogs after postoperative physical rehabilitation and tibial plateau leveling osteotomy or lateral fabellar suture stabilization. Vet Surg 2010; 39: 173-180.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Hercock CA, Pinchbeck G, Giejda A. et al. Validation of a client-based clinical metrology instrument for the evaluation of canine elbow osteoarthritis. J Small Anim Pract 2009; 50: 266-271.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar