Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.16141
The Middle Latency Response: A Review of Findings in Various Central Nervous System Lesions
Publication History
05 October 2016
11 October 2017
Publication Date:
29 May 2020 (online)
Abstract
Background:
The middle latency response (MLR) first came to light as an auditory evoked potential in 1958. Since then, it has aroused substantial interest and investigation by clinicians and researchers alike. In recent history, its use and popularity have dwindled in tandem with various other auditory evoked potentials in audiology. One area for which MLR research and application has been overlooked is its potential value in measuring the neural integrity of the auditory thalamocortical pathway. In a broader sense, the MLR, when combined with the auditory brain stem response, can provide information concerning the status of much of the central auditory system pathways. This review is intended to provide information concerning the MLR as a measure of central auditory function for the reader to consider.
Purpose:
To review and synthesize the scientific literature regarding the potential value of the MLR in assessing the integrity of the central auditory system and to provide the reader an informed perspective on the value of the MLR in this regard. Information is also provided on the MLR generator sites and fundamental characteristics of this evoked potential essential to its clinical and or research application.
Research Design:
A systematic review and synthesis of the literature focusing on the MLR and lesions of the central auditory system.
Study Sample:
Studies and individual cases were reviewed and analyzed that evidenced documented lesions of the central auditory nervous system.
Data Collection and Analysis:
The authors searched and reviewed the literature (journal articles, book chapters, and books) pertaining to central auditory system lesion effects on the MLR.
Results:
Although findings varied from study to study, overall, the MLR was reasonably sensitive and specific to neurological compromise of the central auditory system. This finding is consistent with the generator sites of this evoked potential.
Conclusions:
The MLR is a valuable tool for assessing the integrity of the central auditory system. It should be of interest to the clinician or researcher who focuses their attention on the function and dysfunction of the higher auditory system.
-
REFERENCES
- Amantini A, Rossi L, De Scisciolo G, Bindi A, Pagnini P, Zappoli R. 1984; Auditory evoked potentials (early, middle, late components) and audiological tests in Friedreich’s ataxia. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 58 (01) 37-47
- Azumi T, Nakashima K, Takahashi K. 1993; Auditory middle latency responses in patients with epilepsy. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 34 (03) 185-191
- Baess P, Widmann A, Roye A, Schroger E, Jacobsen T. 2009; Attenuated human auditory middle latency response and evoked 40-Hz response to self-initiated sounds. Eur J Neurosci 29: 1514-1521
- Baran JA, Bothfeld RW, Musiek FE. 2004; Central auditory deficits associated with compromise of the primary auditory cortex. J Am Acad Audiol 15 (02) 106-116
- Celebisoy N, Aydo I, Ekmekçi Ö, Akürekli Ö. 1996; Middle latency auditory evoked potentials (MLAEPs) in (MS). Acta Neurol Scand 93 (05) 318-321
- Cho T, Fischer C, Nighoghossian N, Hermier M, Sindou M, Mauguièr F. 2005; Auditory and electrophysiological patterns of a unilateral lesion of the lateral lemniscus. Audiol Neurootol 10 (03) 153-158
- Drake Jr ME, Weate SJ, Newell SA. 1996; Auditory evoked potentials in postconcussive syndrome. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 36 (08) 457-462
- Eisencraft T, Miranda MFD, Schochat E. 2006; Comparing middle latency response with and without music. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 72 (04) 465-469
- Erwin R, Buchwald JS. 1986; Midlatency auditory 175 evoked responses: differential effects of sleep in the human. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 65: 383-392
- Fifer RC, Sierra-Irizarry B. 1988; Clinical applications of the auditory middle latency response. Otol Neurotol 9: 47-56
- Fischer C, Bognar L, Turjman F, Lapras C. 1995; Auditory evoked potentials in a patient with a unilateral lesion of the inferior colliculus and medial geniculate body. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 96: 261-267
- Fischer C, Bognar L, Turjman F, Villanyi E, Lapras C. 1994; Auditory early- and middle-latency evoked potentials in patients with quadrigeminal plate tumors. Neurosurgery 35 (01) 45-51
- Gaetz M, Goodman D, Weinberg H. 2000; Electrophysiological evidence for the cumulative effects of concussion. Brain Inj 14 (12) 1077-1088
- Godefroy O, Leys D, Furby A, De Reuck J, Daems C, Rondepierre P, Debachy B, Deleume JF, Desaulty A. 1995; Psychoacoustical deficits related to bilateral subcortical hemorrhages a case with apperceptive auditory agnosia. Cortex 31 (01) 149-159
- Gopal KV. 2008; Audiological findings in individuals exposed to organic solvents: case studies. Noise Health 10 (40) 74
- Graham J, Greenwood R, Lecky B. 1980; Cortical deafness: a case report and review of the literature. J Neurol Sci 48 (01) 35-49
- Grimes AM, Grady CL, Pikus A. 1987; Auditory evoked potentials in patients with dementia of the Alzheimer type. Ear Hear 8 (03) 157-161
- Hall J. 2007. New Handbook of Auditory Evoked Responses. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon;
- Hall III JW, Huangfu M, Gennarelli TA, Dolinskas CA, Olson K, Berry GA. 1983; Auditory evoked response impedance measures and diagnostic speech audiometry in severe head injury. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 91: 50-60
- Harker LA, Backoff P. 1980; Middle latency electric auditory responses in patients with acoustic neuroma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 89 (01) 131-136
- Hashimoto I. 1982; Auditory evoked potentials from the human midbrain: slow brain stem responses. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 53: 652-657
- Hayashi K, Hayashi R. 2007; Pure word deafness due to left subcortical lesion: neurophysiological studies of two patients. Clin Neurophysiol 118 (04) 863-868
- Hendler T, Squires NK, Emmerich DS. 1990; Psychophysical measures of central auditory dysfunction in multiple sclerosis: neurophysiological and neuroanatomical correlates. Ear Hear 11 (06) 403-416
- Henry-Le Bras F, Fischer C, Nighoghossian N, Salord F, Trouillas P, Mauguire F. 1994; Brainstem and middle-latency auditory evoked potentials in vertebrobasilar strokes. Neurophysiol Clin 24: 399-412
- Hinman CL, Buchwald JS. 1983; Depth evoked potential and single unit correlates of vertex midlatency auditory evoked responses. Brain Res 264 (01) 57-67
- Ho KJ, Kileny P, Paccioretti D, McLean DR. 1987; Neurologic, audiologic, and electrophysiologic sequelae of bilateral temporal lobe lesions. Arch Neurol 44 (09) 982-987
- Ibañez V, Deiber MP, Fischer C. 1989; Middle latency auditory evoked potentials in cortical lesions: criteria of interhemispheric asymmetry. Arch Neurol 46 (12) 1325-1332
- Jacobson GP, Grayson AS. 1988; The normal scalp topography of the middle latency auditory evoked potential Pa component following monaural click stimulation. Brain Topogr 1: 29-36
- Japaridze G, Shakarishvili R, Kevanishvili Z. 2002; Auditory brainstem, middle-latency, and slow cortical responses in multiple sclerosis. Acta Neurol Scand 106 (01) 47-53
- Jerger J, Chmiel R, Glaze D, Frost J. 1987; Rate and filter dependence of the middle latency response in infants. Audiology 26: 269-283
- Johkura K, Matsumoto S, Hasegawa O, Kuroiwa Y. 1998; Defective auditory recognition after small hemorrhage in the inferior colliculi. J Neurol Sci 161: 91-96
- Kaga K, Hink RF, Shinoda Y, Suzuki J. 1980; Evidence for a primary cortical origin of a middle latency auditory evoked potential in cats. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 50: 254-266
- Kaga K, Kurauchi T, Yumoto M, Uno A. 2004; Middle-latency auditory-evoked magnetic fields in patients with auditory cortex lesions. Acta Otolaryngol 124 (04) 376-380
- Kaseda Y, Tobimatsu S, Morioka T, Kato M. 1991; Auditory middle-latency responses in patients with localized and non-localized lesions of the central nervous system. J Neurol 238 (08) 427-432
- Kileny P, Paccioretti D, Wilson AF. 1987; Effects of cortical lesions on middle-latency auditory evoked responses (MLR). Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 66 (02) 108-120
- Knight RT, Brailowsky S. 1990; Auditory evoked potentials from the primary auditory cortex of the cat: topographic and pharmacological studies. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 77: 225-232
- Kraus N, McGee T, Littman T, Nicol T. 1992; Reticular formation influences on primary and non-primary auditory pathways as reflected by the middle latency response. Brain Res 587 (02) 186-194
- Kraus N, Nicol T. 2009. Auditory evoked potentials. In: Binder MD, Hirokawa N, Windhorst U. Encyclopedia of Neuroscience. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 214-218
- Kraus N, Özdamar Ö, Hier D, Stein L. 1982; Auditory middle latency responses (MLRs) in patients with cortical lesions. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 54 (03) 275-287
- Kraus N, Smith DI, McGee T. 1988; Midline and temporal lobe MLRs in the guinea pig originate from different generator systems: a conceptual framework for new and existing data. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 70: 541-558
- Kuriki S, Nogai T, Hirata Y. 1995; Cortical sources of middle latency responses of auditory evoked magnetic field. Hear Res 92: 47-51
- Liegeois-Chauvel C, Musolino A, Badier JM, Marquis P, Chauvel P. 1994; Evoked potentials recorded from the auditory cortex in man: evaluation and topography of the middle latency components. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 92: 201-214
- Makela JP, Hamalainen M, Hari R, McEvoy L. 1994; Whole-head mapping of middle-latency auditory evoked magnetic fields. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 92: 414-421
- McFarland WH, Vivion MC, Goldstein R. 1977; Middle components of the AER to tone-pips in normal-hearing and hearingimpaired subjects. J Speech Hear Res 20: 781-798
- McGee T, Kraus N, Comperatore C, Nicol T. 1991; Subcortical and cortical components of the MLR generating system. Brain Res 544 (02) 211-220
- McGee T, Kraus N, Littman T, Nicol T. 1992; Contributions of medial geniculate body subdivisions to the middle latency response. Hear Res 61: 147-154
- Møller AR., Kern JK, Grannemann B. 2005; Are the non-classical auditory pathways involved in autism and PDD?. Neurol Res 27 (06) 625-629
- Møller AR, Møller MB, Yokota M. 1992; Some forms of tinnitus may involve the extralemniscal auditory pathway. Laryngoscope 102 (10) 1165-1171
- Munjal SK, Panda NK, Pathak A. 2010; Audiological deficits after closed head injury. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 68 (01) 13-18
- Musiek F. 1991. Auditory evoked responses in site-of-lesion assessment. In: Fintelmann EF. Hearing Assessment. Austin, TX: Allyn & Bacon; 407-411
- Musiek FE, Baran JA. 2007. The Auditory System: Anatomy, Physiology and Clinical Correlates. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon;
- Musiek FE, Baran J, Pinheiro M. 1994. Neuroaudiology Case Studies. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Group;
- Musiek FE, Baran JA, Shinn JB, Guenette L, Zaidan E, Weihing J. 2007; Central deafness: an audiological case study. Int J Audiol 46 (08) 433-441
- Musiek F, Charette L, Kelly T, Lee W, Musiek E. 1999; Hit and false positives rates for the middle latency evoked response in patients with central nervous system involvement. J Am Acad Audiol 10: 124-132
- Musiek FE, Charette L, Morse D, Baran JA. 2004; Central deafness associated with a midbrain lesion. J Am Acad Audiol 15 (02) 133-151
- Musiek FE, Geurkink NA, Weider DJ, Donnelly K. 1984; Past, present, and future applications of the auditory middle latency response. Laryngoscope 94 (12) 1545-1553
- Musiek F, Lee WW. 1997; Conventional and maximum length sequences middle latency response in patients with central nervous system lesions. J Am Acad Audiol 8: 173-180
- Musiek F, Lee W. 1999. Auditory middle and late potentials. In: Musiek F, Rintelmann W. Contemporary Perspectives on Hearing Assessment. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon; 243-272
- Musiek F, Mohanan A, Wierzbinski E, Kilgore G, Hunter J, Marotto J. 2011; The non-classical pathway: too great to be ignored. Hear J 64 (10) 6
- Nagle S, Musiek FE. 2009; Morphological changes in the middle latency response using maximum length sequence stimuli. J Am Acad Audiol 20 (08) 492-502
- Nelson MD, Hall JW, Jacobson GP. 1997; Factors affecting the recordability of auditory evoked response (AER) component Pb (P1). J Am Acad Audiol 8: 44-52
- Ottaviani F, Almadori G, Calderazzo AB, Frenguelli A, Paludetti G. 1986; Auditory brain-stem (ABss) and middle latency auditory responses (MLRs) in the prognosis of severely head-injured patients. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 65 (03) 196-202
- Özdamar Ö, Kraus N. 1983; Auditory middle-latency responses in humans. Audiology 22 (01) 34-49
- Özdamar Ö, Kraus N, Curry F. 1982; Auditory brain stem and middle latency responses in a patient with cortical deafness. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 53 (02) 224-230
- Parving A, Salomon G, Elberling C, Larsen B, Lassen NA. 1980; Middle components of the auditory evoked response in bilateral temporal lobe lesions: report on a patient with auditory agnosia. Scand Audiol 9 (03) 161-167
- Peronnet F, Michel F. 1977. The asymmetry of auditory evoked potentials in normal man and patients with brain lesions. In: Desmedt JE. Auditory Evoked Potentials in Man: Psychopharmacology Correlates of EPs. Basel, Switzerland: Karger; 130-141
- Phillips NA, Connolly J, Charles Mate-Kole C, Gray J. 1997; Individual differences in auditory middle latency responses in elderly adults and patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Int J Psychophys 27 (02) 125-136
- Pialarissi PR, Almeida FS, Camanducaia LC, Jorge Jr JJ. 2007; Middle-latency auditory responses in neurological diseases. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 73 (04) 540-548
- Picton TW. 2011. Human Auditory Evoked Potentials. San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing, Inc;
- Ponton CW, Don M, Eggermont JJ, Waring MD, Masuda A. 1996; Maturation of human cortical auditory function: differences between normal-hearing children and children with cochlear implants. Ear Hear 17 (05) 430-437
- Pratt H. 2007. Middle-latency response. In: Burkard RF, Don M, Eggermont JJ. Auditory Evoked Potentials: Basic Principles and Clinical Application. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Williams; 463-481
- Robinson K, Rudge P. 1977; Abnormalities of the auditory evoked potentials in patients with multiple sclerosis. Brain 100: 19-40
- Rosati G, De Bastiani P, Paolino E, Prosser S, Arslan E, Artioli M. 1982; Clinical and audiological findings in a case of auditory agnosia. J Neurol 227 (01) 21-27
- Scherg M, Von Cramon D. 1986; Evoked dipole source potentials of the human auditory cortex. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 65: 344-360
- Schochat E, Matas CG, Sanches SGG, Carvallo RM, Matas S. 2006; Central auditory evaluation in multiple sclerosis: case report. Arch Neuropsych 64 3B 872-876
- Seki H, Kimura I, Ohnuma A, Saso S, Kogure K. 1993; The auditory evoked middle-latency responses (MLRs): their normative variation and generators. Tohuku J Exp Med 170: 157-167
- Shehata-Dieler W, Shimizu H, Soliman SM, Tusa RJ. 1991; Middle latency auditory evoked potentials in temporal lobe disorders. Ear Hear 12 (06) 377-388
- Sosa R, Fraire Martínez MI, Olvera Gómez JL, Jáuregui-Renaud K. 2009; Early auditory middle latency evoked potentials correlates with recovery from aphasia after stroke. Clin Neurophysiol 120 (01) 136-139
- Soustiel JF, Hafner H, Chistyakov AV, Barzilai A, Feinsod M. 1995; Trigeminal and auditory evoked responses in minor head injuries and post-concussion syndrome. Brain Inj 9 (08) 805-813
- Squires K, Hecox K. 1983; Electrophysiological evaluation of higher level auditory processing. Semi Hear 4: 415-432
- Suzuki T, Hirabayashi M, Kobayashi K. 1984; Effects of analog and digital filtering on auditory middle latency responses in adults and young children. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 93 (03) 267-270
- Tucker D, Ruth R. 1996; Effects of age, signal level, and signal rate on the auditory middle latency response. J Am Acad Audiol 7 (02) 83-91
- Versino M, Bergamaschi R, Romani A, Banfi P, Callieco R, Citterio A, Gerosa E, Cosi V. 1992; Middle latency auditory evoked potentials improve the detection of abnormalities along auditory pathways in multiple sclerosis patients. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 84 (03) 296-299
- Woods DL, Clayworth CC. 1985; Click spatial position influences middle latency auditory evoked potentials (MAEPs) in humans. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 60 (02) 122-129
- Woods DL, Clayworth CC, Knight RT, Simpson GV, Naeser MA. 1987; Generators of middle-and long-latency auditory evoked potentials: implications from studies of patients with bitemporal lesions. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 68 (02) 132-148
- Yoshiura T, Ueno S, Iramina K, Masuda K. 1995; Source localization of middle latency auditory evoked magnetic fields. Brain Res 703: 139-144
- Yvert B, Crouzeiz A, Bertrand O, Seither-Preisler A, Pantev C. 2001; Multiple supratemporal sources of magnetic and electric auditory evoked middle latency components in humans. Cereb Cortex 11: 411-423