Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2015; 09(01): 092-099
DOI: 10.4103/1305-7456.149652
Original Article
Dental Investigation Society

Resin composite repair: Quantitative microleakage evaluation of resin-resin and resin-tooth interfaces with different surface treatments

Cigdem Celik
1   Departments of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Baskent University, Bahcelievler, Ankara, Turkiye
,
Sevi Burcak Cehreli
2   Departments of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Baskent University, Bahcelievler, Ankara, Turkiye
,
Neslihan Arhun
1   Departments of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Baskent University, Bahcelievler, Ankara, Turkiye
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
04 September 2019 (online)

Also available at
  PDF Download Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Objective: The aim was to evaluate the effect of different adhesive systems and surface treatments on the integrity of resin-resin and resin-tooth interfaces after partial removal of preexisting resin composites using quantitative image analysis for microleakage testing protocol. Materials and Methods: A total of 80 human molar teeth were restored with either of the resin composites (Filtek Z250/GrandioSO) occlusally. The teeth were thermocycled (1000×). Mesial and distal 1/3 parts of the restorations were removed out leaving only middle part. One side of the cavity was finished with course diamond bur and the other was air-abraded with 50 μm Al2O3. They were randomly divided into four groups (n = 10) to receive: Group 1: Adper Single Bond 2; Group 2: All Bond 3; Group 3: ClearfilSE; Group 4: BeautiBond, before being repaired with the same resin composite (Filtek Z250). The specimens were re-thermocycled (1000×), sealed with nail varnish, stained with 0.5% basic fuchsin, sectioned mesiodistally and photographed digitally. The extent of dye penetration was measured by image analysis software (ImageJ) for both bur-finished and air-abraded surfaces at resin-tooth and resin-resin interfaces. The data were analyzed statistically. Results: BeautiBond exhibited the most microleakage at every site. Irrespective of adhesive and initial composite type, air-abrasion showed less microleakage except for BeautiBond. The type of initial repaired restorative material did not affect the microleakage. BeautiBond adhesive may not be preferred in resin composite repair in terms of microleakage prevention. Conclusions: Surface treatment with air-abrasion produced the lowest microleakage scores, independent of the adhesive systems and the pre-existing resin composite type. Pre-existing composite type does not affect the microleakage issue. All-in-one adhesive resin (BeautiBond) may not be preferred in resin composite repair in terms of microleakage prevention.

Key words:

Adhesive System - composite repair - microleakage - surface treatment
 

  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Downer MC, Azli NA, Bedi R, Moles DR, Setchell DJ. How long do routine dental restorations last? A systematic review. Br Dent J 1999; 187: 432-9
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Rashid RG. Dentists’ molar restoration choices and longevity: A web-based survey. J Prosthet Dent 2004; 91: 363-7
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Mjör IA, Gordan VV. Failure, repair, refurbishing and longevity of restorations. Oper Dent 2002; 27: 528-34
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Ozcan M, Cura C, Brendeke J. Effect of aging conditions on the repair bond strength of a microhybrid and a nanohybrid resin composite. J Adhes Dent 2010; 12: 451-9
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Gordan VV, Riley 3rd JL, Blaser PK, Mjör IA. 2-year clinical evaluation of alternative treatments to replacement of defective amalgam restorations. Oper Dent 2006; 31: 418-25
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Lucena-Martín C, González-López S, Navajas-Rodríguez de MondeloJM. The effect of various surface treatments and bonding agents on the repaired strength of heat-treated composites. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 86: 481-8
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Pounder B, Gregory WA, Powers JM. Bond strengths of repaired composite resins. Oper Dent 1987; 12: 127-31
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Hannig C, Laubach S, Hahn P, Attin T. Shear bond strength of repaired adhesive filling materials using different repair procedures. J Adhes Dent 2006; 8: 35-40
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Papacchini F, Dall’Oca S, Chieffi N, Goracci C, Sadek FT, Suh BI. et al. Composite-to-composite microtensile bond strength in the repair of a microfilled hybrid resin: Effect of surface treatment and oxygen inhibition. J Adhes Dent 2007; 9: 25-31
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Malacarne J, Carvalho RM, de Goes MF, Svizero N, Pashley DH, Tay FR. et al. Water sorption/solubility of dental adhesive resins. Dent Mater 2006; 22: 973-80
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Ozcan M, Alander P, Vallittu PK, Huysmans MC, Kalk W. Effect of three surface conditioning methods to improve bond strength of particulate filler resin composites. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2005; 16: 21-7
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Costa TR, Ferreira SQ, Klein-Júnior CA, Loguercio AD, Reis A. Durability of surface treatments and intermediate agents used for repair of a polished composite. Oper Dent 2010; 35: 231-7
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Bonstein T, Garlapo D, Donarummo Jr J, Bush PJ. Evaluation of varied repair protocols applied to aged composite resin. J Adhes Dent 2005; 7: 41-9
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Rathke A, Tymina Y, Haller B. Effect of different surface treatments on the composite-composite repair bond strength. Clin Oral Investig 2009; 13: 317-23
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Spyrou M, Koliniotou-Koumpia E, Kouros P, Koulaouzidou E, Dionysopoulos P. The reparability of contemporary composite resins. Eur J Dent 2014; 8: 353-9
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Van kerckhoven H, Lambrechts P, van Beylen M, Davidson CL, Vanherle G. Unreacted methacrylate groups on the surfaces of composite resins. J Dent Res 1982; 61: 791-5
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 17 Ozcan M, Kojima AN, Pekkan G, Mesquita AM, Bottino MA. Adhesion of substrate-adherent combinations for early composite repairs: Effect of intermediate adhesive resin application. Int J Adh Adhes 2014; 49: 97-102
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Gordan VV, Shen C, Riley 3rd J, Mjör IA. Two-year clinical evaluation of repair versus replacement of composite restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent 2006; 18: 144-53
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Setcos JC, Khosravi R, Wilson NH, Shen C, Yang M, Mjör IA. Repair or replacement of amalgam restorations: Decisions at a USA and a UK dental school. Oper Dent 2004; 29: 392-7
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Shahdad SA, Kennedy JG. Bond strength of repaired anterior composite resins: An in vitro study. J Dent 1998; 26: 685-94
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Cehreli SB, Arhun N, Celik C. Amalgam repair: Quantitative evaluation of amalgam-resin and resin-tooth interfaces with different surface treatments. Oper Dent 2010; 35: 337-44
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Yesilyurt C, Kusgoz A, Bayram M, Ulker M. Initial repair bond strength of a nano-filled hybrid resin: Effect of surface treatments and bonding agents. J Esthet Restor Dent 2009; 21: 251-60
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Rodrigues Jr SA, Ferracane JL, Della BonaA. Influence of surface treatments on the bond strength of repaired resin composite restorative materials. Dent Mater 2009; 25: 442-51
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Nakabayashi N, Watanabe A, Gendusa NJ. Dentin adhesion of “modified” 4-META/MMA-TBB resin: Function of HEMA. Dent Mater 1992; 8: 259-64
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Nakaoki Y, Nikaido T, Pereira PN, Inokoshi S, Tagami J. Dimensional changes of demineralized dentin treated with HEMA primers. Dent Mater 2000; 16: 441-6
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Van Landuyt KL, Snauwaert J, De Munck J, Peumans M, Yoshida Y, Poitevin A. et al. Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives. Biomaterials 2007; 28: 3757-85
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Moszner N, Salz U, Zimmermann J. Chemical aspects of self-etching enamel-dentin adhesives: A systematic review. Dent Mater 2005; 21: 895-910
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Tay FR, Pashley DH, Yoshiyama M. Two modes of nanoleakage expression in single-step adhesives. J Dent Res 2002; 81: 472-6
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 29 Ikeda T, De Munck J, Shirai K, Hikita K, Inoue S, Sano H. et al. Effect of air-drying and solvent evaporation on the strength of HEMA-rich versus HEMA-free one-step adhesives. Dent Mater 2008; 24: 1316-23
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Hiraishi N, Breschi L, Prati C, Ferrari M, Tagami J, King NM. Technique sensitivity associated with air-drying of HEMA-free, single-bottle, one-step self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater 2007; 23: 498-505
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Cavalcanti AN, De Lima AF, Peris AR, Mitsui FH, Marchi GM. Effect of surface treatments and bonding agents on the bond strength of repaired composites. J Esthet Restor Dent 2007; 19: 90-8
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Ito S, Hashimoto M, Wadgaonkar B, Svizero N, Carvalho RM, Yiu C. et al. Effects of resin hydrophilicity on water sorption and changes in modulus of elasticity. Biomaterials 2005; 26: 6449-59
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Aschenbrenner CM, Lang R, Handel G, Behr M. Analysis of marginal adaptation and sealing to enamel and dentin of four self-adhesive resin cements. Clin Oral Investig 2012; 16: 191-200
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Bagis YH, Baltacioglu IH, Kahyaogullari S. Comparing microleakage and the layering methods of silorane-based resin composite in wide Class II MOD cavities. Oper Dent 2009; 34: 578-85
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Cehreli SB, Tirali RE, Yalcinkaya Z, Cehreli ZC. Microleakage of newly developed glass carbomer cement in primary teeth. Eur J Dent 2013; 7: 15-21
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 36 Korasli D, Ziraman F, Ozyurt P, Cehreli SB. Microleakage of self-etch primer/adhesives in endodontically treated teeth. J Am Dent Assoc 2007; 138: 634-40
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar