Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2015; 09(04): 551-557
DOI: 10.4103/1305-7456.172624
Original Article
Dental Investigation Society

Evaluation of root morphology and root canal configuration of premolars in the Turkish individuals using cone beam computed tomography

Duygu Goller Bulut
1   Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, University of Erciyes, Kayseri, Turkiye
,
Emre Kose
1   Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, University of Erciyes, Kayseri, Turkiye
,
Gozde Ozcan
1   Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, University of Erciyes, Kayseri, Turkiye
,
Ahmet Ercan Sekerci
1   Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, University of Erciyes, Kayseri, Turkiye
,
Emin Murat Canger
1   Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, University of Erciyes, Kayseri, Turkiye
,
Yıldıray Sisman
1   Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, University of Erciyes, Kayseri, Turkiye
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
23 September 2019 (online)

Also available at
  PDF Download Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Objective: The aim of the present study is to assess the root and root canal morphology of maxillary and mandibular premolars in a Turkish population by using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Materials and Methods: In this study, CBCT images of 2134 premolars (987 maxillary, 1147 mandibular) were obtained from 404 patients. Details of gender, age, number of roots and canals, and canal configuration in each root were recorded. The canal configuration was classified and evaluated according to Vertucci's criteria. Results: The majority of maxillary premolars had two separate roots; although, three roots were identified in 1% of maxillary first premolars. However, most of the mandibular premolars had a single root. The two canals (69.9%) and type I (62.6%) and type II (34.1%) configuration for upper first premolar, one canal (82.1%) and type I (77.6%) canal configuration for second premolar was the most prevalent root canal frequency. The most prevalent root canal frequency was the one canal (96.2%) and type I (94.2%) and type V (3.2%) configuration for mandibular first premolar, one canal (98.9%) and type I (98.9%) canal configuration for second premolar. There was no difference in the root canal configurations and the numbers of canals between the left and the right side of both females and males (P > 0.05). Conclusions: Recognition of morphology and anatomy of the root canal system is one of the most important factors for successful endodontic treatment. Preoperative CBCT examination allows determination of root canal configuration of premolar teeth and helps clinicians in root canal treatment.

Key words:

Cone beam computed tomography - mandibular premolars - maxillary premolars - root canal anatomy - root canal morphology
 

  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Hargreoues KM, Cohen S. Cohen's Pathways of the Pulp. 10th ed.. China: Mosby Elsevier Inc.; 2011: p. 141-7
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 2 Lin Z, Hu Q, Wang T, Ge J, Liu S, Zhu M. et al. Use of CBCT to investigate the root canal morphology of mandibular incisors. Surg Radiol Anat 2014; 36: 877-82
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Patel S, Dawood A, Ford TP, Whaites E. The potential applications of cone beam computed tomography in the management of endodontic problems. Int Endod J 2007; 40: 818-30
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Tian YY, Guo B, Zhang R, Yu X, Wang H, Hu T. et al. Root and canal morphology of maxillary first premolars in a Chinese subpopulation evaluated using cone-beam computed tomography. Int Endod J 2012; 45: 996-1003
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Vertucci FJ. Root canal morphology and its relationship to endodontic procedures. Endod Topics 2005; 10: 3-29
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Vertucci FJ, Williams RG. Root canal anatomy of the mandibular first molar. J N J Dent Assoc 1974; 45: 27-8
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Nur BG, Ok E, Altunsoy M, Aglarci OS, Colak M, Gungor E. Evaluation of the root and canal morphology of mandibular permanent molars in a south-eastern Turkish population using cone-beam computed tomography. Eur J Dent 2014; 8: 154-9
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Gulabivala K, Opasanon A, Ng YL, Alavi A. Root and canal morphology of Thai mandibular molars. Int Endod J 2002; 35: 56-62
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Pécora JD, Woelfel JB, Sousa NetoMD. Morphologic study of the maxillary molars 1. External anatomy. Braz Dent J 1991; 2: 45-50
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Buhrley LJ, Barrows MJ, BeGole EA, Wenckus CS. Effect of magnification on locating the MB2 canal in maxillary molars. J Endod 2002; 28: 324-7
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Skidmore AE, Bjorndal AM. Root canal morphology of the human mandibular first molar. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1971; 32: 778-84
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Seidberg BH, Altman M, Guttuso J, Suson M. Frequency of two mesiobuccal root canals in maxillary permanent first molars. J Am Dent Assoc 1973; 87: 852-6
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Sperber GH, Moreau JL. Study of the number of roots and canals in Senegalese first permanent mandibular molars. Int Endod J 1998; 31: 117-22
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Fan B, Gao Y, Fan W, Gutmann JL. Identification of a C-shaped canal system in mandibular second molars-part II: The effect of bone image superimposition and intraradicular contrast medium on radiograph interpretation. J Endod 2008; 34: 160-5
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Pineda F, Kuttler Y. Mesiodistal and buccolingual roentgenographic investigation of 7,275 root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1972; 33: 101-10
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Demirbuga S, Sekerci AE, Dinçer AN, Cayabatmaz M, Zorba YO. Use of cone-beam computed tomography to evaluate root and canal morphology of mandibular first and second molars in Turkish individuals. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2013; 18: e737-44
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Altunsoy M, Ok E, Nur BG, Aglarci OS, Gungor E, Colak M. A cone-beam computed tomography study of the root canal morphology of anterior teeth in a Turkish population. Eur J Dent 2014; 8: 302-6
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Ok E, Altunsoy M, Nur BG, Aglarci OS, Çolak M, Güngör E. A cone-beam computed tomography study of root canal morphology of maxillary and mandibular premolars in a Turkish population. Acta Odontol Scand 2014; 72: 701-6
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Awawdeh L, Abdullah H, Al-Qudah A. Root form and canal morphology of Jordanian maxillary first premolars. J Endod 2008; 34: 956-61
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Caliskan MK, Pehlivan Y, Sepetçioglu F, Türkün M, Tuncer SS. Root canal morphology of human permanent teeth in a Turkish population. J Endod 1995; 21: 200-4
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Kartal N, Ozçelik B, Cimilli H. Root canal morphology of maxillary premolars. J Endod 1998; 24: 417-9
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Vertucci FJ, Gegauff A. Root canal morphology of the maxillary first premolar. J Am Dent Assoc 1979; 99: 194-8
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Vertucci FJ. Root canal anatomy of the human permanent teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1984; 58: 589-99
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Slowey RR. Root canal anatomy. Road map to successful endodontics. Dent Clin North Am 1979; 23: 555-73
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 England Jr MC, Hartwell GR, Lance JR. Detection and treatment of multiple canals in mandibular premolars. J Endod 1991; 17: 174-8
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Shetty A, Hegde MN, Tahiliani D, Shetty H, Bhat GT, Shetty S. A three-dimensional study of variations in root canal morphology using cone-beam computed tomography of mandibular premolars in a South Indian population. J Clin Diagn Res 2014; 8: ZC22-4
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Sert S, Bayirli GS. Evaluation of the root canal configurations of the mandibular and maxillary permanent teeth by gender in the Turkish population. J Endod 2004; 30: 391-8
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Vertucci F, Seelig A, Gillis R. Root canal morphology of the human maxillary second premolar. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1974; 38: 456-64
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Sert S, Aslanalp V, Tanalp J. Investigation of the root canal configurations of mandibular permanent teeth in the Turkish population. Int Endod J 2004; 37: 494-9
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Vertucci FJ. Root canal morphology of mandibular premolars. J Am Dent Assoc 1978; 97: 47-50
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Llena C, Fernandez J, Ortolani PS, Forner L. Cone-beam computed tomography analysis of root and canal morphology of mandibular premolars in a Spanish population. Imaging Sci Dent 2014; 44: 221-7
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Trope M, Elfenbein L, Tronstad L. Mandibular premolars with more than one root canal in different race groups. J Endod 1986; 12: 343-5
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar