Awareness during anaesthesia for surgery requiring evoked potential monitoring: A pilot study

Abstract

Background: Evoked potential monitoring such as somatosensory-evoked potential (SSEP) or motor-evoked potential (MEP) monitoring during surgical procedures in proximity to the spinal cord requires minimising the minimum alveolar concentrations (MACs) below the anaesthetic concentrations normally required (1 MAC) to prevent interference in amplitude and latency of evoked potentials. This could result in awareness. Our primary objective was to determine the incidence of awareness while administering low MAC inhalational anaesthetics for these unique procedures. The secondary objective was to assess the adequacy of our anaesthetic technique from neurophysiologist’s perspective. Methods: In this prospective observational pilot study, 61 American Society of Anesthesiologists 1 and 2 patients undergoing spinal surgery for whom intraoperative evoked potential monitoring was performed were included; during the maintenance phase, 0.7–0.8 MAC of isoflurane was targeted. We evaluated the intraoperative depth of anaesthesia using a bispectral (BIS) index monitor as well as the patients response to surgical stimulus (PRST) scoring system. Post-operatively, a modified Bruce questionnaire was used to verify awareness. The adequacy of evoked potential readings was also assessed. Results: Of the 61 patients, no patient had explicit awareness. Intraoperatively, 19 of 61 patients had a BIS value of above sixty at least once, during surgery. There was no correlation with PRST scoring and BIS during surgery. Fifty-four out of 61 patient’s evoked potential readings were deemed ‘good’ or ‘fair’ for the conduct of electrophysiological monitoring. Conclusions: This pilot study demonstrates that administering low MAC inhalational anaesthetics to facilitate evoked potential monitoring does not result in explicit awareness. However, larger studies are needed to verify this. The conduct of SSEP electrophysiological monitoring was satisfactory with the use of this anaesthetic technique. However, the conduct of MEP monitoring was satisfactory, only in patients with Nurick Grade 1 and 2. The MEP response was poor in patients with Nurick Grade 4 and 5.

Keywords

Anaesthesia - anaesthesia depth monitor - awareness - evoked potential monitoring - spine

• REFERENCES

• 1 Chandanwale AS, Ramteke AA, Barhate S. Intra-operative somatosensory-evoked potential monitoring. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2008; 16: 277-80
• 2 Banoub M, Tetzlaff JE, Schubert A. Pharmacologic and physiologic influences affecting sensory evoked potentials: Implications for perioperative monitoring. Anesthesiology 2003; 99: 716-37
• 3 Pelosi L, Stevenson M, Hobbs GJ, Jardine A, Webb JK. Intraoperative motor evoked potentials to transcranial electrical stimulation during two anaesthetic regimens. Clin Neurophysiol 2001; 112: 1076-87
• 4 Evans JM, Davies WL. Monitoring anesthesia. Clin Anesth 1984; 2: 243-62
• 5 Brice DD, Hetherington RR, Utting JE. A simple study of awareness and dreaming during anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 1970; 42: 535-42
• 6 Kothbauer KF. Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring for intramedullary spinal-cord tumor surgery. Neurophysiol Clin 2007; 37: 407-14
• 7 Lotto ML, Banoub M, Schubert A. Effects of anesthetic agents and physiologic changes on intraoperative motor evoked potentials. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2004; 16: 32-42
• 8 Devadoss U, Babu S, Cherian V. Quantifying the effect of isoflurane and nitrous oxide on somatosensory-evoked potentials. Indian J Anaesth 2010; 54: 40-4
• 9 Pathak KS, Amaddio MD, Scoles PV, Shaffer JW, Mackay W. Effects of halothane, enflurane, and isoflurane in nitrous oxide on multilevel somatosensory evoked potentials. Anesthesiology 1989; 70: 207-12
• 10 Mashour GA, Orser BA, Avidan MS. Intraoperative awareness: From neurobiology to clinical practice. Anesthesiology 2011; 114: 1218-33
• 11 Squire LR, Stark CE, Clark RE. The medial temporal lobe. Annu Rev Neurosci 2004; 27: 279-306
• 12 Aceto P, Lai C, Perilli V, Dello Russo C, Federico B, Navarra P. et al. Stress-related biomarkers of dream recall and implicit memory under anaesthesia. Anaesthesia 2013; 68: 1141-7
• 13 Schwender D, Daunderer M, Klasing S, Mulzer S, Finsterer U, Peter K. Monitoring intraoperative awareness. Vegetative signs, isolated forearm technique, electroencephalogram, and acute evoked potentials. Anaesthesist 1996; 45: 708-21
• 14 Mashour GA, Avidan MS. Intraoperative awareness: Controversies and non-controversies. Br J Anaesth 2015; 115 Suppl (Suppl. 01) i20-6
• 15 Aceto P, Perilli V, Lai C, Sacco T, Modesti C, Luca E. et al. Minimum alveolar concentration threshold of sevoflurane for postoperative dream recall. Minerva Anestesiol 2015; 81: 1201-9
• 16 Nurick S. The pathogenesis of the spinal cord disorder associated with cervical spondylosis. Brain 1972; 95: 87-100
• 17 Wilson-Holden TJ, Padberg AM, Lenke LG, Larson BJ, Bridwell KH, Bassett GS. Efficacy of intraoperative monitoring for pediatric patients with spinal cord pathology undergoing spinal deformity surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1999; 24: 1685-92
• 18 Leslie K, Chan MT, Myles PS, Forbes A, McCulloch TJ. Posttraumatic stress disorder in aware patients from the B-aware trial. Anesth Analg 2010; 110: 823-8