CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2017; 11(03): 380-384
DOI: 10.4103/ejd.ejd_280_16
Original Article
European Journal of Dentistry

Influence of irrigating agents on fiber postpush-out bond strength to radicular dentin sections with the different adhesive system

Satheesh B. Haralur
1   Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha
,
Asim Nasser A. Alasabi
2   Intern Dentist, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha
,
Sultan A. Abohathrah Al Qahtani
2   Intern Dentist, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha
,
Saeed Musleh S. Alqahtani
2   Intern Dentist, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
25 September 2019 (online)

ABSTRACT

Objective: The objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of irrigating agents on push-out bond strength of resin postcemented with various adhesive systems at different radicular dentin sections. Materials and Methods:Sixty single-rooted premolar teeth were root canal treated, subsequently decorated at cementoenamel junction. The endodontic postspace was irrigated with 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) and 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) for Group A (n = 30) and Group B (n = 30), respectively. The sample from each group was subdivided into three groups (10) according to luting protocol of etch-wash, self-etch, and self-adhesive. Individual teeth with cemented resin postsamples were sectioned into coronal, middle, and apical segments. Subsequently, subjected for pushout bond strength test by applying a load at 0.5 mm/min speed. The data were analyzed by three-way analysis of variance and Tukey comparison test at a significant difference level of 0.05.Results: The coronal section with 5.25% NaOCl irrigation and self-etch luting protocol provided the highest push out strength at 16.282 Mpa. The etch-wash luting protocol in both irrigations showed the lesser bond strength at 8.273 and 8.493 MPa, respectively, in coronal section.Conclusions: The self-etch adhesive system showed better push out bond strength and 17% EDTA had a negative influence on self-etch bond strength. The coronal sections had highest bond strength in comparison with apical radicular dentin sections.

 
  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Adanir N, Belli S. Evaluation of different post lengths' effect on fracture resistance of a glass fiber post system. Eur J Dent 2008; 2: 23-8
  • 2 Vichi A, Ferrari M, Davidson CL. Influence of ceramic and cement thickness on the masking of various types of opaque posts. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 83: 412-7
  • 3 Jongsma LA, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Influence of surface pretreatment of fiber posts on cement delamination. Dent Mater 2010; 26: 901-7
  • 4 Jongsma LA, Bolhuis PB, Pallav P, Feilzer AJ, Kleverlaan CJ. Benefits of a two-step cementation procedure for prefabricated fiber posts. J Adhes Dent 2010; 12: 55-62
  • 5 Malyk Y, Kaaden C, Hickel R, Ilie N. Analysis of resin tags formation in root canal dentine: A cross sectional study. Int Endod J 2010; 43: 47-56
  • 6 Bitter K, Hambarayan A, Neumann K, Blunck U, Sterzenbach G. Various irrigation protocols for final rinse to improve bond strengths of fiber posts inside the root canal. Eur J Oral Sci 2013; 121: 349-54
  • 7 Guerisoli DM, Marchesan MA, Walmsley AD, Lumley PJ, Pecora JD. Evaluation of smear layer removal by EDTAC and sodium hypochlorite with ultrasonic agitation. Int Endod J 2002; 35: 418-21
  • 8 Bitter K, Meyer-Lueckel H, Priehn K, Kanjuparambil JP, Neumann K, Kielbassa AM. et al. Effects of luting agent and thermocycling on bond strengths to root canal dentine. Int Endod J 2006; 39: 809-18
  • 9 Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P. et al. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: Current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 2003; 28: 215-35
  • 10 Pashley DH, Horner JA, Brewer PD. Interactions of conditioners on the dentin surface. Oper Dent 1992; Suppl 5: 137-50
  • 11 Marshall Jr GW, Marshall SJ, Kinney JH, Balooch M. The dentin substrate: Structure and properties related to bonding. J Dent 1997; 25: 441-58
  • 12 Gwinnett AJ, Tay FR, Pang KM, Wei SH. Quantitative contribution of the collagen network in dentin hybridization. Am J Dent 1996; 9: 140-4
  • 13 Nakabayashi N, Kojima K, Masuhara E. The promotion of adhesion by the infiltration of monomers into tooth substrates. J Biomed Mater Res 1982; 16: 265-73
  • 14 Breschi L, Mazzoni A, Ruggeri A, Cadenaro M, Di Lenarda R, De Stefano Dorigo E. et al. Dental adhesion review: Aging and stability of the bonded interface. Dent Mater 2008; 24: 90-101
  • 15 Lührs AK, Guhr S, Günay H, Geurtsen W. Shear bond strength of self-adhesive resins compared to resin cements with etch and rinse adhesives to enamel and dentin in vitro. Clin Oral Investig 2010; 14: 193-9
  • 16 Yazici AR, Yildirim Z, Ertan A, Ozgunaltay G, Dayangac B, Antonson SA. et al. Bond strength of one-step self-etch adhesives and their predecessors to ground versus unground enamel. Eur J Dent 2012; 6: 280-6
  • 17 Ferrari M, Mannocci F, Vichi A, Cagidiaco MC, Mjör IA. Bonding to root canal: Structural characteristics of the substrate. Am J Dent 2000; 13: 255-60
  • 18 Mjör IA, Smith MR, Ferrari M, Mannocci F. The structure of dentine in the apical region of human teeth. Int Endod J 2001; 34: 346-53