Computed tomography angiographic study of internal mammary perforators and their use as recipient vessels for free tissue transfer in breast reconstruction

ABSTRACT

Context: The internal mammary artery perforator vessels (IMPV) as a recipient in free flap breast reconstruction offer advantages over the more commonly used thoracodorsal vessels and the internal mammary vessels (IMV). Aims: This study was designed to assess the anatomical consistency of the IMPV and the suitability of these vessels for use as recipients in free flap breast reconstruction. Patients and Methods: Data from ten randomly selected female patients who did not have any chest wall or breast pathology but had undergone a computed tomography angiography (CTA) for unrelated diagnostic reasons from April 2013 to October 2013 were analysed. Retrospective data of seven patients who had undergone mastectomy for breast cancer and had been primarily reconstructed with a deep inferior epigastric artery perforator free flap transfer using the IMPV as recipient vessels were studied. Results: The CTA findings showed that the internal mammary perforator was consistently present in all cases bilaterally. In all cases, the dominant perforator arose from the upper four intercostal spaces (ICS) with the majority (55%) arising from the 2^nd ICS. The mean distance of the perforators from the sternal border at the level of pectoralis muscle surface on the right side was 1.86 cm (range: 0.9–2.5 cm) with a mode value of 1.9 cm. On the left side, a mean of 1.77 cm (range: 1.5–2.1 cm) and a mode value of 1.7 cm were observed. Mean perforator artery diameters on the right and left sides were 2.2 mm and 2.4 mm, respectively. Conclusions: Though the internal mammary perforators are anatomically consistent, their use as recipients in free tissue transfer for breast reconstruction eventually rests on multiple variables.

KEY WORDS

Computed tomography angiography - free flap breast reconstruction - hand-held Doppler - internal mammary perforators - recipient vessels

• REFERENCES

• 1 Saint-Cyr M, Youssef A, Bae HW, Robb GL, Chang DW. Changing trends in recipient vessel selection for microvascular autologous breast reconstruction: An analysis of 1483 consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 119: 1993-2000
• 2 Moran SL, Nava G, Behnam AB, Serletti JM. An outcome analysis comparing the thoracodorsal and internal mammary vessels as recipient sites for microvascular breast reconstruction: A prospective study of 100 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003; 111: 1876-82
• 3 Dupin CL, Allen RJ, Glass CA, Bunch R. The internal mammary artery and vein as a recipient site for free-flap breast reconstruction: A report of 110 consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996; 98: 685-9
• 4 Feng LJ. Recipient vessels in free-flap breast reconstruction: A study of the internal mammary and thoracodorsal vessels. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 99: 405-16
• 5 Lantieri LA, Mitrofanoff M, Rimareix F, Gaston E, Raulo Y, Baruch JP. Use of circumflex scapular vessels as a recipient pedicle for autologous breast reconstruction: A report of 40 consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 104: 2049-53
• 6 Taylor GI, Palmer JH. The vascular territories (angiosomes) of the body: Experimental study and clinical applications. Br J Plast Surg 1987; 40: 113-41
• 7 Bakamjian VY, Long M, Rigg B. Experience with the medially based deltopectoral flap in reconstructuve surgery of the head and neck. Br J Plast Surg 1971; 24: 174-83
• 8 Blondeel PH. Perforator Flaps in Breast Reconstruction (Panel) Presented at Third International Course on Perforator Flaps in FIZ. Munich, Germany: 12-14 November 1999
• 9 Guzzetti T, Thione A. Successful breast reconstruction with a perforator to deep inferior epigastric perforator flap. Ann Plast Surg 2001; 46: 641-3
• 10 Hamdi M, Blondeel P, Van Landuyt K, Monstrey S. Algorithm in choosing recipient vessels for perforator free flap in breast reconstruction: The role of the internal mammary perforators. Br J Plast Surg 2004; 57: 258-65
• 11 Follmar KE, Prucz RB, Manahan MA, Magarakis M, Rad AN, Rosson GD. Internal mammary intercostal perforators instead of the true internal mammary vessels as the recipient vessels for breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 127: 34-40
• 12 Schellekens PP, Paes EC, Hage JJ, van der Wal MB, Bleys RL, Kon M. Anatomy of the vascular pedicle of the internal mammary artery perforator (IMAP) flap as applied for head and neck reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2011; 64: 53-7
• 13 Schmidt M, Aszmann OC, Beck H, Frey M. The anatomic basis of the internal mammary artery perforator flap: A cadaver study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2010; 63: 191-6
• 14 Kim H, Lim SY, Pyon JK, Bang SI, Oh KS, Mun GH. Preoperative computed tomographic angiography of both donor and recipient sites for microsurgical breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 130: 11e-20
• 15 Saint-Cyr M, Chang DW, Robb GL, Chevray PM. Internal mammary perforator recipient vessels for breast reconstruction using free TRAM, DIEP, and SIEA flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 120: 1769-73
• 16 Haywood RM, Raurell A, Perks AG, Sassoon EM, Logan AM, Phillips J. Autologous free tissue breast reconstruction using the internal mammary perforators as recipient vessels. Br J Plast Surg 2003; 56: 689-91
• 17 Halim AS, Alwi AA. Internal mammary perforators as recipient vessels for deep inferior epigastric perforator and muscle-sparing free transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap breast reconstruction in an Asian population. Ann Plast Surg 2014; 73: 170-3
• 18 Munhoz AM, Ishida LH, Montag E, Sturtz GP, Saito FL, Rodrigues L. et al. Perforator flap breast reconstruction using internal mammary perforator branches as a recipient site: An anatomical and clinical analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 114: 62-8
• 19 Park MC, Lee JH, Chung J, Lee SH. Use of internal mammary vessel perforator as a recipient vessel for free TRAM breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2003; 50: 132-7