A Systematic Review of Evidence for Education and Training Interventions in Microsurgery

Over the past decade, driven by advances in educational theory and pressures for efficiency in the clinical environment, there has been a shift in surgical education and training towards enhanced simulation training. Microsurgery is a technical skill with a steep competency learning curve on which the clinical outcome greatly depends. This paper investigates the evidence for educational and training interventions of traditional microsurgical skills courses in order to establish the best evidence practice in education and training and curriculum design. A systematic review of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed databases was performed to identify randomized control trials looking at educational and training interventions that objectively improved microsurgical skill acquisition, and these were critically appraised using the BestBETs group methodology. The databases search yielded 1,148, 1,460, and 2,277 citations respectively. These were then further limited to randomized controlled trials from which abstract reviews reduced the number to 5 relevant randomised controlled clinical trials. The best evidence supported a laboratory based low fidelity model microsurgical skills curriculum. There was strong evidence that technical skills acquired on low fidelity models transfers to improved performance on higher fidelity human cadaver models and that self directed practice leads to improved technical performance. Although there is significant paucity in the literature to support current microsurgical education and training practices, simulated training on low fidelity models in microsurgery is an effective intervention that leads to acquisition of transferable skills and improved technical performance. Further research to identify educational interventions associated with accelerated skill acquisition is required.

Keywords

Microsurgery - Clinical competence - Education - Curriculum

This article was presented at the Inaugural Meeting of the International Microsurgery Simulation Society on Jun 30, 2012 in London, UK.

Publication History

Received: 23 January 2013

Accepted: 08 February 2013

Article published online:
01 May 2022

• References

• 1 Tsuda S, Scott D, Doyle J. et al. Surgical skills training and simulation. Curr Probl Surg 2009; 46: 271-370
• 2 Kern DE, Thomas PA. Hughes. Curriculum development for medical education: a six-step approach. 2nd ed. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press; 2009
• 3 Higgins JP, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 4.2.6 [Internet]. Clayton: Australia; 2006. cited 2013 Apr 16 Available from: https://www.mv.helsinki.fi/home/hemila/karlowski/handbook_4_2_6_Karlowski.pdf
• 4 Anastakis DJ, Regehr G, Reznick RK. et al. Assessment of technical skills transfer from the bench training model to the human model. Am J Surg 1999; 177: 167-170
• 5 Grober ED, Hamstra SJ, Wanzel KR. et al. Laboratory based training in urological microsurgery with bench model simulators: a randomized controlled trial evaluating the durability of technical skill. J Urol 2004; 172: 378-381
• 6 Grober ED, Hamstra SJ, Wanzel KR. et al. The educational impact of bench model fidelity on the acquisition of technical skill: the use of clinically relevant outcome measures. Ann Surg 2004; 240: 374-381
• 7 Moulton CA, Dubrowski A, Macrae H. et al. Teaching surgical skills: what kind of practice makes perfect?: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Surg 2006; 244: 400-409
• 8 Price J, Naik V, Boodhwani M. et al. A randomized evaluation of simulation training on performance of vascular anastomosis on a high-fidelity in vivo model: the role of deliberate practice. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011; 142: 496-503
• 9 Grunwald T, Krummel T, Sherman R. Advanced technologies in plastic surgery: how new innovations can improve our training and practice. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 114: 1556-1567
• 10 Reznick RK. Teaching and testing technical skills. Am J Surg 1993; 165: 358-361
• 11 Sutherland LM, Middleton PF, Anthony A. et al. Surgical simulation: a systematic review. Ann Surg 2006; 243: 291-300
• 12 Reznick RK, MacRae H. Teaching surgical skills--changes in the wind. N Engl J Med 2006; 355: 2664-2669
• 13 Ilie VG, Ilie VI, Dobreanu C. et al. Training of microsurgical skills on nonliving models. Microsurgery 2008; 28: 571-577
• 14 Champion HR, Gallagher AG. Surgical simulation - a 'good idea whose time has come'. Br J Surg 2003; 90: 767-768
• 15 Sturm LP, Windsor JA, Cosman PH. et al. A systematic review of skills transfer after surgical simulation training. Ann Surg 2008; 248: 166-179
• 16 Sedlack RE, Kolars JC. Computer simulator training enhances the competency of gastroenterology fellows at colonoscopy: results of a pilot study. Am J Gastroenterol 2004; 99: 33-37
• 17 Ahlberg G, Hultcrantz R, Jaramillo E. et al. Virtual reality colonoscopy simulation: a compulsory practice for the future colonoscopist?. Endoscopy 2005; 37: 1198-1204
• 18 Cohen J, Cohen SA, Vora KC. et al. Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of virtual-reality simulator training in acquisition of competency in colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 64: 361-368
• 19 Grober ED, Hamstra SJ, Wanzel KR. et al. Validation of novel and objective measures of microsurgical skill: Hand-motion analysis and stereoscopic visual acuity. Microsurgery 2003; 23: 317-322
• 20 Kalu PU, Atkins J, Baker D. et al. How do we assess microsurgical skill?. Microsurgery 2005; 25: 25-29
• 21 Temple CL, Ross DC. A new, validated instrument to evaluate competency in microsurgery: the University of Western Ontario Microsurgical Skills Acquisition/Assessment instrument. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 127: 215-222