Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.5999/aps.2016.43.5.402
Informed Consent as a Litigation Strategy in the Field of Aesthetic Surgery: An Analysis Based on Court Precedents
We would like to sincerely and profusely thank all members of our staff at Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital for their able guidance and support in completing this project.
Background In an increasing number of lawsuits doctors lose, despite providing preoperative patient education, because of failure to prove informed consent. We analyzed judicial precedents associated with insufficient informed consent to identify judicial factors and trends related to aesthetic surgery medical litigation.
Methods We collected data from civil trials between 1995 and 2015 that were related to aesthetic surgery and resulted in findings of insufficient informed consent. Based on these data, we analyzed the lawsuits, including the distribution of surgeries, dissatisfactions, litigation expenses, and relationship to informed consent.
Results Cases were found involving the following types of surgery: facial rejuvenation (38 cases), facial contouring surgery (27 cases), mammoplasty (16 cases), blepharoplasty (29 cases), rhinoplasty (21 cases), body-contouring surgery (15 cases), and breast reconstruction (2 cases). Common reasons for postoperative dissatisfaction were deformities (22%), scars (17%), asymmetry (14%), and infections (6%). Most of the malpractice lawsuits occurred in Seoul (population 10 million people; 54% of total plastic surgeons) and in primary-level local clinics (113 cases, 82.5%). In cases in which only invalid informed consent was recognized, the average amount of consolation money was KRW 9,107,143 (USD 8438). In cases in which both violation of non-malfeasance and invalid informed consent were recognized, the average amount of consolation money was KRW 12,741,857 (USD 11,806), corresponding to 38.6% of the amount of the judgment.
Conclusions Surgeons should pay special attention to obtaining informed consent, because it is a double-edged sword; it has clinical purposes for doctors and patients but may also be a litigation strategy for lawyers.
Publication History
Received: 11 April 2016
Accepted: 31 August 2016
Article published online:
20 April 2022
© 2016. The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, permitting unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
REFERENCES
- 1 International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery ISAPS glocal statistics: ISAPS International Survey on Aesthetic/Cosmetic Procedures Performed in 2014 [Internet]. Hanover International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery; 2015 cited 2016 Feb 2 Available from: http://www.isaps.org/Media/Default/global-statistics/2015%20ISAPS%20Results.pdf
- 2 World Bank. Medical malpractice systems around the globe: examples from the US- tort liability system and the Sweden-no fault system Washington, DC: World Bank; 2003
- 3 Bal BS. An introduction to medical malpractice in the United States. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009; 467: 339-347
- 4 Brendel RW, Wei MH, Schouten R. et al. An approach to selected legal issues: confidentiality, mandatory reporting, abuse and neglect, informed consent, capacity decisions, boundary issues, and malpractice claims. Med Clin North Am 2010; 94: 1229-1240
- 5 Alexander AA. Complaints, grievances, and claims against physicians: does tort reform make a difference?. J Healthc Risk Manag 2010; 30: 32-42
- 6 Mallardi V. The origin of informed consent. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 2005; 25: 312-327
- 7 Judkins-Cohn TM, Kielwasser-Withrow K, Owen M. et al. Ethical principles of informed consent: exploring nurses' dual role of care provider and researcher. J Contin Educ Nurs 2014; 45: 35-42
- 8 Lidz CW. The therapeutic misconception and our models of competency and informed consent. Behav Sci Law 2006; 24: 535-546
- 9 Li GS, Dong MM, Liu LB. et al. Ethical issues in Chinese aesthetic surgery. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2014; 38: 994-1000
- 10 Supreme Court of South Korea Decision No. 2002 Da 48443 Rendered on 25 October 2002
- 11 Kim CW. The scope of explanation for doctor's obligation of explanation (Supreme Court Decision No.2004 Da 64067, rendered on 29 April 2005) [Internet]. Seoul: The Law Times; 2005. cited 2016 Feb 2 Available from: https://www.lawtimes.co.kr/Legal-Info/Cases-Commentary-View?Serial=733
- 12 Supreme Court of South Korea Decision No. 2001 Ga 5867 Rendered on 31 May 2007
- 13 Marchesi A, Marchesi M, Fasulo FC. et al. Mammaplasties and medicolegal issues: 50 cases of litigation in aesthetic surgery of the breast. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2012; 36: 122-127
- 14 Kim SY. If reparation for bodily intrusion from medical malpractice is recognized, reparation for violation of the obligation of explanation cannot be claimed separately [Internet]. Seoul: The Law Times; 2010. cited 2016 Feb 2 Available from: https://www.lawtimes.co.kr/Legal-News/Legal-News-View?Serial=52745
- 15 Supreme Court of South Korea Decision No. 94 Da 35671. Rendered on 25 November 1994