Multifactorial analysis of the surgical outcomes of giant congenital melanocytic nevi: Single versus serial tissue expansion

Background Giant congenital melanocytic nevus (GCMN) is a rare disease, for which complete surgical resection is recommended. However, the size of the lesions presents problems for the management of the condition. The most popular approach is to use a tissue expander; however, single-stage expansion in reconstructive surgery for GCMN cannot always address the entire defect. Few reports have compared tissue expansion techniques. The present study compared single and serial expansion to analyze the risk factors for complications and the surgical outcomes of the two techniques.

Methods We retrospectively reviewed the medical charts of patients who underwent tissue expander reconstruction between March 2011 and July 2019. Serial expansion was indicated in cases of anatomically obvious defects after the first expansion, limited skin expansion with two more expander insertions, or capsular contracture after removal of the first expander.

Results Fifty-five patients (88 cases) were analyzed, of whom 31 underwent serial expansion. The number of expanders inserted was higher in the serial-expansion group (P<0.001). The back and lower extremities were the most common locations for single and serial expansion, respectively (P=0.043). Multivariate analysis showed that sex (odds ratio [OR], 0.257; P=0.015), expander size (OR, 1.016; P=0.015), and inflation volume (OR, 0.987; P=0.015) were risk factors for complications.

Conclusions Serial expansion is a good option for GCMN management. We demonstrated that large-sized expanders and large inflation volumes can lead to complications, and therefore require risk-reducing strategies. Nonetheless, serial expansion with proper management is appropriate for certain patients and can provide aesthetically satisfactory outcomes.

Keywords

Nevus, pigmented - Skin neoplasms - Tissue expansion - Tissue expansion devices - Surgical flaps

Publication History

Received: 22 July 2020

Accepted: 03 November 2020

Article published online:
25 March 2022

• REFERENCES

• 1 Gosain AK, Santoro TD, Larson DL. et al. Giant congenital nevi: a 20-year experience and an algorithm for their management. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 108: 622-36
• 2 Castilla EE, da Graca Dutra M, Orioli-Parreiras IM. Epidemiology of congenital pigmented naevi: I. incidence rates and relative frequencies. Br J Dermatol 1981; 104: 307-15
• 3 Price HN, Schaffer JV. Congenital melanocytic nevi-when to worry and how to treat: facts and controversies. Clin Dermatol 2010; 28: 293-302
• 4 Argenta LC, Marks MW, Pasyk KA. Advances in tissue expansion. Clin Plast Surg 1985; 12: 159-71
• 5 Vander Kolk CA, McCann JJ, Knight KR. et al. Some further characteristics of expanded tissue. Clin Plast Surg 1987; 14: 447-53
• 6 Takei T, Mills I, Arai K. et al. Molecular basis for tissue expansion: clinical implications for the surgeon. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 102: 247-58
• 7 Hudson DA, Lazarus D, Silfen R. The use of serial tissue expansion in pediatric plastic surgery. Ann Plast Surg 2000; 45: 589-93
• 8 Lee MK, Park SO, Choi TH. Serial tissue expansion at the same site in pediatric patients: is the subsequent expansion faster?. Arch Plast Surg 2017; 44: 523-9
• 9 Johnson TM, Lowe L, Brown MD. et al. Histology and physiology of tissue expansion. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1993; 19: 1074-8
• 10 Agrawal K, Agrawal S. Tissue regeneration during tissue expansion and choosing an expander. Indian J Plast Surg 2012; 45: 7-15
• 11 Gonzalez Ruiz Y, Lopez Gutierrez JC. Multiple tissue expansion for giant congenital melanocytic nevus. Ann Plast Surg 2017; 79: e37-e40
• 12 Zaal LH, van der Horst CM. Results of the early use of tissue expansion for giant congenital melanocytic naevi on the scalp and face. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2009; 62: 216-20
• 13 Manders EK, Schenden MJ, Furrey JA. et al. Soft-tissue expansion: concepts and complications. Plast Reconstr Surg 1984; 74: 493-507
• 14 Bauer BS, Margulis A. The expanded transposition flap: shifting paradigms based on experience gained from two decades of pediatric tissue expansion. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 114: 98-106
• 15 Tepole AB, Ploch CJ, Wong J. et al. Growing skin: a computational model for skin expansion in reconstructive surgery. J Mech Phys Solids 2011; 59: 2177-90
• 16 Mostafapour SP, Murakami CS. Tissue expansion and serial excision in scar revision. Facial Plast Surg 2001; 17: 245-52
• 17 LoGiudice J, Gosain AK. Pediatric tissue expansion: indications and complications. Plast Surg Nurs 2004; 24: 20-6
• 18 Austad ED, Pasyk KA, McClatchey KD. et al. Histomorphologic evaluation of guinea pig skin and soft tissue after controlled tissue expansion. Plast Reconstr Surg 1982; 70: 704-10
• 19 Bauer BS, Vicari FA, Richard ME. The role of tissue expansion in pediatric plastic surgery. Clin Plast Surg 1990; 17: 101-12
• 20 Borenstein A, Yaffe B, Seidman DS. et al. Tissue expansion in reconstruction of postburn contracture of the first web space of the hand. Ann Plast Surg 1991; 26: 463-5
• 21 Antonyshyn O, Gruss JS, Mackinnon SE. et al. Complications of soft tissue expansion. Br J Plast Surg 1988; 41: 239-50
• 22 Lee T, Vaca EE, Ledwon JK. et al. Improving tissue expansion protocols through computational modeling. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2018; 82: 224-34