21 Follicular Unit Transplantation or Follicular Unit Excision: Planning and Decision-Making
Book
Editors: Unger, Robin; Shapiro, Ronald
Title: Hair Transplantation
Print ISBN: 9781626236936; Online ISBN: 9781684202737; Book DOI: 10.1055/b000000335
6. Edition © 2023 Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., New York
Subjects: Plastic, Reconstructive and Cosmetic Surgery;Dermatology
Thieme Clinical Collections (English Language)
Summary
In modern hair restoration surgery, follicular units can be harvested in one of two ways: strip-follicular unit transplantation (strip-FUT or FUT), which is the microsurgical dissection of follicular units out of a strip of donor material (FUT), and follicular unit excision (FUE), where the follicular units are extracted individually and directly from the donor area. Both FUE and FUT are outstanding techniques and selecting the most appropriate technique for each patient is not always a simple task because many factors need to be taken into consideration. The decision will be based on patients’ goals and expectations, hair characteristic, age, gender donor area, etc. Each technique has its own advantages and disadvantages. FUE used to have high levels of transection and fragile grafts with a risk of poor survival. However, FUE has improved significantly over the last few years. Today, follicular transection, survival, and aesthetic results can be the same for both FUE and FUT. A major advantage of FUE in patients’ eyes is that it does not produce a linear scar and has a less traumatic postoperative course. This has led to high patient demand and rapid growth of the procedure to the point that today, more FUE is performed than FUT. Often, it is not a difference in recipient area aesthetic results as much as a personal preference with respect a donor scar and postoperative course that determines a patient’s choice.
For example, a young male may sport a short hairstyle and not want a linear scar (no matter how fine), while a female or middle-aged executive may not want to undergo the extensive donor shaving required for FUE. Although both techniques are acceptable in many cases, there are still some notable instances that FUE or FUT is the preferred technique.
Key words
follicular unit quality - donor supply - transection rates - complications - hair transplant surgery - hair growth- 1 Bernstein RM, Rassman WR. Follicular transplantation. Patient evaluation and surgical planning.. Dermatol Surg 1997; 23 (9) 771-784, discussion 801–805 PubMed
- 2 Limmer BL. Donor strip slivering and microscopic dissection. In: Haber RS, Stough DB, eds. Hair Transplantation. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Saunders; 2006:86
- 4 Rassman WR, Bernstein RM, McClellan R, Jones R, Worton E, Uyttendaele H. Follicular unit extraction: minimally invasive surgery for hair transplantation.. Dermatol Surg 2002; 28 (8) 720-728 PubMed
- 5 Bernstein R, Rassman W. Follicular unit extraction mega sessions: evolution of a technique.. Hair Transpl Forum Int 2004; 14: 97-99
- 6 Harris JA. New methodology and instrumentation for follicular unit extraction: lower follicle transection rates and expanded patient candidacy.. Dermatol Surg 2006; 32 (1) 56-61, discussion 61–62 PubMed
- 7 Devroye J. My technique: WAW Foot Pedal and Unsharp Non-Traumatic Punches. Presented at the 3rd Mediterranean FUE Workshop, Turkey; 2015
- 8 Bernstein R. Pre-making recipient sites to increase graft survival in manual and robotic FUE procedures.. Hair Transpl Forum Int 2012; 7/8: 128
- 12 Feriduni B. FUE and FUT, a comparison of both techniques. Presented at the 2nd Mediterranean FUE Workshop, Spain; 2013
- 13 Wolf B. Cyberspace chat: exploring the limits of follicular unit extraction. Hair Transpl Forum Int 2016; 09/10: 208-213
- 14 Wong J. Preservation and strategy for donor area: FUT mega-sessions. Presented at the 3rd Mediterranean FUE Workshop, Turkey; 2015