14 Prognostication, Ethics, and Scales

Arturo Montaño and J. Claude Hemphill III

Abstract

A prognosis for outcome from acute stroke will be expected from doctors by most patients and families. In patients with severe stroke, this prognosis, especially related to long-term function and quality of life, may influence decisions regarding aggressiveness of care. Many different clinical grading scales have been developed for acute ischemic stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage, and aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage that can provide a measure of baseline severity and a prediction of outcome. These grading scales are most often developed from populations of patients using mathematical techniques to assess the association of various clinical, demographic, and neuroimaging predictors on outcome. Thus, they are generally not intended to be applied to individual patients for the purpose of precise prognostication. Numerous other factors including prestroke function, medical comorbidities, and trajectory of improvement over time may also provide prognostic information. Thus, prognostication is inherently uncertain, although it can often provide reasonably accurate general information. There is concern over the self-fulfilling prophecy of poor outcome if a patient with a perceived poor prognosis but potential for recovery has care limited or withdrawn early in their hospital course. Intersecting with the use of prognostic information in medical decision-making are ethical principles that guide the process and interactions between medical providers, patients, and their surrogate decision-makers. The principle of patient autonomy over their medical decisions is prioritized. The concept of shared decision-making is emphasized as a method by which patients and providers work together to respect patient values and goals in the often-challenging context of severe stroke.

Schlüsselwörter

clinical grading scale - prognostication - shared decision-making - autonomy - paternalism - self-fulfilling prophecy

• 1 Wandel A, Jørgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS. Prediction of walking function in stroke patients with initial lower extremity paralysis: the Copenhagen Stroke Study.. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000; 81 (6) 736-738 PubMed

• 2 Reding MJ, Potes E. Rehabilitation outcome following initial unilateral hemispheric stroke. Life table analysis approach.. Stroke 1988; 19 (11) 1354-1358 PubMed

• 3 Hirano Y, Hayashi T, Nitta O et al. Prediction of independent walking ability for severely hemiplegic stroke patients at discharge from a rehabilitation hospital.. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2016; 25 (8) 1878-1881 PubMed

• 4 Hemphill III JC, Bonovich DC, Besmertis L, Manley GT, Johnston SC. The ICH score: a simple, reliable grading scale for intracerebral hemorrhage.. Stroke 2001; 32 (4) 891-897 PubMed

• 5 Rabinstein AA, Diringer MN. Withholding care in intracerebral hemorrhage: realistic compassion or self-fulfilling prophecy?. Neurology 2007; 68 (20) 1647-1648 PubMed

• 6 Sembill JA, Gerner ST, Volbers B et al. Severity assessment in maximally treated ICH patients: the max-ICH score.. Neurology 2017; 89 (5) 423-431 PubMed

• 7 Witsch J, Frey HP, Patel S et al. Prognostication of long-term outcomes after subarachnoid hemorrhage: the FRESH score.. Ann Neurol 2016; 80 (1) 46-58 PubMed

• 8 Jaja BNR, Saposnik G, Lingsma HF, et al. Development and validation of outcome prediction models for aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: the SAHIT multinational cohort study.. BMJ 2018; 360: j5745 PubMed

• 9 Puig J, Pedraza S, Blasco G et al. Wallerian degeneration in the corticospinal tract evaluated by diffusion tensor imaging correlates with motor deficit 30 days after middle cerebral artery ischemic stroke.. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010; 31 (7) 1324-1330 PubMed

• 10 Puig J, Pedraza S, Blasco G et al. Acute damage to the posterior limb of the internal capsule on diffusion tensor tractography as an early imaging predictor of motor outcome after stroke.. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011; 32 (5) 857-863 PubMed

• 11 Jang SH, Bai D, Son SM et al. Motor outcome prediction using diffusion tensor tractography in pontine infarct.. Ann Neurol 2008; 64 (4) 460-465 PubMed

• 12 Hosomi A, Nagakane Y, Yamada K et al. Assessment of arcuate fasciculus with diffusion-tensor tractography may predict the prognosis of aphasia in patients with left middle cerebral artery infarcts.. Neuroradiology 2009; 51 (9) 549-555 PubMed

• 13 Loubinoux I, Carel C, Pariente J et al. Correlation between cerebral reorganization and motor recovery after subcortical infarcts.. Neuroimage 2003; 20 (4) 2166-2180 PubMed

• 14 Claassen J, Hirsch LJ, Frontera JA et al. Prognostic significance of continuous EEG monitoring in patients with poor-grade subarachnoid hemorrhage.. Neurocrit Care 2006; 4 (2) 103-112 PubMed

• 15 Hwang DY, Dell CA, Sparks MJ et al. Clinician judgment vs formal scales for predicting intracerebral hemorrhage outcomes.. Neurology 2016; 86 (2) 126-133 PubMed

• 16 Hemphill III JC, Greenberg SM, Anderson CS, et al. , , Guidelines for the management of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.. Stroke 2015; 46 (7) 2032-2060 PubMed

• 17 Rohaut B, Claassen J. Decision-making in perceived devastating brain injury: a call to explore the impact of cognitive biases.. Br J Anaesth 2018; 120 (1) 5-9 PubMed

• 18 Stirrat GM, Gill R. Autonomy in medical ethics after O’Neill.. J Med Ethics 2005; 31 (3) 127-130 PubMed

• 19 Neugebauer H, Creutzfeldt CJ, Hemphill III JC, Heuschmann PU, Jüttler E. DESTINY-S: attitudes of physicians toward disability and treatment in malignant MCA infarction.. Neurocrit Care 2014; 21 (1) 27-34 PubMed

• 20 Holloway RG, Arnold RM, Creutzfeldt CJ, et al. Palliative and end-of-life care in stroke: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.. Stroke 2014; 45 (6) 1887-1916 PubMed