Subscribe to RSS
Please copy the URL and add it into your RSS Feed Reader.
https://www.thieme-connect.de/rss/thieme/en/10.1055-s-00039246.xml
Br Homeopath J 1992; 81(01): 2-12
DOI: 10.1016/S0007-0785(05)80285-6
DOI: 10.1016/S0007-0785(05)80285-6
About some traps set by ‘crude’ repertorization methods[ * ]
Need for clinical data and intelligent repertorization systems Part 1. Repertorization methods compared with voting proceduresSubject Editor:
Further Information
Publication History
Publication Date:
11 July 2018 (online)
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/10.1055-s-00039246/199201/lookinside/thumbnails/10-1016-s0007-0785(05)80285-6-1.jpg)
Abstract
Homœopathic treatment is individualized. Computerized repertories have been using a number of different methods of selecting medicines. The dangers of simplistic methods are discussed. The theory of voting can be applied to homœopathic repertorization, with different methods producing conflicting results. The logical structure of different procedures and their relationship to the competence of the prescriber is discussed.
Key Words
Information technology - Repertory - Voting - Multiple criteria decision making - Majority - Sum of degrees - Pairwise majority - Rousseau - Borda - Condorcet* A paper presented at the Homœopathia/Internationalis Multigroup Meeting, Stavelot (Belgium) 1–4 May 1991.
1 Facultés Universitairs N.-D. de la Paix, Institut d'Informatique, Namur, and Archimede asbl, Rivière (Belgium).