Subscribe to RSS
Please copy the URL and add it into your RSS Feed Reader.
https://www.thieme-connect.de/rss/thieme/en/10.1055-s-00034926.xml
Homeopathy 2009; 98(01): 70-72
DOI: 10.1016/j.homp.2008.09.005
DOI: 10.1016/j.homp.2008.09.005
Letter to the editor
Response to Geoff Johnson
Subject Editor:
Further Information
Publication History
Publication Date:
02 January 2018 (online)

Dear Sir,
I usually reply with facts and to the point.[ 1 ]
The three persons mentioned were really my students – not one week followers, they attended a lot of my teaching before they became well-known.[ 2 ]
I think I have the right to criticise their public statements and ideas concerning a, which that according in my opinion has been badly distorted in recent years.
If some of their “followers” do not like this criticism or are shaken by this it is not my problem. A science that does not receive criticism from the inside either will disappear or will end up as a caricature.
-
References
- 1 Johnson G. Letter to the Editor: Are media attacks justified? A response to Vithoulkas. Hompeopathy 2009; 98(1): 70.
- 2 Vithoulkas G. British media attacks on homeopathy: Are they justified?. Homeopathy April 2008; 97: 103-106.