Opposite repertory-rubrics in Bayesian perspective

A.L.B. Rutten; H. Frei

doi:10.1016/j.homp.2010.02.002

Homeopathy, Inhaltsverzeichnis

Homeopathy 2010; 99(02): 113-118
DOI: 10.1016/j.homp.2010.02.002

Original Paper

Opposite repertory-rubrics in Bayesian perspective

A.L.B. Rutten

¹Commissie Methode en Validering VHAN (Dutch Association of Homeopathic Physicians), Aard 10, 4813 NN Breda, The Netherlands

,

H. Frei

²Institute for Complementary and Alternative Medicine, KIKOM, University of Berne, Kreutzplatz 6, CH-3177 Laupen, Switzerland

› Institutsangaben
Verantwortlicher Herausgeber dieser Rubrik:

Abstract

Introduction: Hitherto entries have been added to a rubric in the repertory when patients responding well to a specific medicine showed the corresponding symptom. Continuing like this, theoretically every medicine will eventually appear in every rubric.

Method: This becomes clear if we compare opposite symptom-rubrics. Polarity Analysis (PA) subtracts opposite rubrics and has been shown to improve clinical results.

Conclusion: The source of this problem and the reason for the success of PA are clear from Bayesian perspective. A reliable repertory should be based on Bayesian principles.

Keywords

Bayes - Repertory - Polarity Analysis - Homeopathy

Volltext

Referenzen

References
1 Boenninghausen Cv. In: Gypser K.-H. Boenninghausen's Therapeutisches Taschenbuch . 2000. Stuttgart: Sonntag-Publishers.;
2 Schuricht U. Bemerkungen zur Gradierung der Arzneimittel in Boenninghausens Therapeutischem Taschenbuch. Unpublished results, 2009.
3 Gypser KH. “Inttermittierende Empfindungen” – Versuch einer Rubirkenerstellung. Lecture held at the Gleeser Akademie homöopathischer Aerzzte, 2008.
4 Stolper C.F., Rutten A.L.B., Lugten R.F.G., Barthels R.J.W.M.M. Improving homeopathic prescribing by applying epidemiological techniques: the role of likelihood ratio. Homeopathy 2002; 91: 230-238.
5 Rutten A.L.B., Stolper C.F., Lugten R.F., Barthels R.J. Repertory and likelihood ratio: time for structural changes. Homeopathy 2004; 93: 120-124.
6 Rutten A.L.B., Stolper C.F., Lugten R.F., Barthels R.J. Statistical analysis of sic repertory rubrics after prospective assessment applying Bayes' theorem. Homeopathy 2009; 98: 26-34.
7 Frei H. Polarity analysis, a new approach to increase the precision of homeopathic prescriptions. Homeopathy 2009; 98: 49-55.
8 Frei H., Ammon Kvon, Thurneysen A. Treatment of hyperactive children: increased efficiency through modifications of homeopathic diagnostic procedure. Homeopathy 2006; 95: 163-170.
9 Boenninghausen Arbeitsgemeinschaft, Boenninghausen's therapeutic pocket book, revised edn 2006, PC-version 1.6.5, 2000–2008, Ahrweiler, 2006, Available from: www.boenninhausen.de.
10 Schroyens F., Boesy B., Coquillart G. et al. Boenninhausen-module, radar program. Assesse: Archibel; 2006.
11 Stegemann T, Raess S. jRep, Rottenburg am Neckar, 2006.
12 Steiner U, Amokoor 2008. Homöopathie Software, Immensee, 2007.
13 Bayes T. An essay toward solving a problem in the doctrine of chances. Philos Trans R Soc Lond A 1763; 53: 370-418.
14 Gill C.J., Sabin L., Schnid C.H. Why clinicians are natural Bayesians. BMJ 2005; 330: 1080-1083.
15 Woodworth G.G. Biostatistic: a Bayesian introduction. Wiley; 2004.
16 Wassenhoven Mvan. Towards an evidence based repertory: clinical evaluation of Veratrum album . Homeopathy 2004; 93: 71-77.
17 Rabe S. Das “unzuverlässige” homöopathische Symptom – Ueberlegungen zu Freis Therapiekonzept des AD(H)S. ZKH 2009; 53 (02) 67-71 doi:10.1055/s-0029-1213535.
18 Frei H. Effiziente homöopathische Behandlung. Stuttgart: Haug-Verlag; 2007.